UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6902
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHAUN EUGENE REED,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1)
Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016
Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaun Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shaun Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion to vacate judgment. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. As the district court
correctly determined, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do
not provide a vehicle by which Reed may challenge his criminal
judgment. See United States v. O’Keefe, 169 F.3d 281, 289
(5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Mosavi, 138 F.3d 1365, 1366
(11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). Additionally, Reed did not
satisfy the “four essential prerequisites” needed to obtain
coram nobis relief. See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568,
576 (4th Cir. 2013). We therefore affirm the district court’s
order. United States v. Reed, No. 3:05-cr-00003-GMG-JES-1 (N.D.
W. Va. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2