UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1341
RICKEY NELSON JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, Maryland Judiciary,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:15-cv-03336-CCB)
Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: November 8, 2016
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rickey Nelson Jones, LAW OFFICES OF REVEREND RICKEY NELSON
JONES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh,
Attorney General of Maryland, Michele J. McDonald, Assistant
Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rickey Nelson Jones appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination
in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and
denying his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).
We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to
state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Philips v. Pitt
Cnty. Mem’l Hosp., 572 F.3d 176, 179-80 (4th Cir. 2009). We
review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of
discretion. MLC Auto., LLC v. Town of S. Pines, 532 F.3d 269,
277 (4th Cir. 2008); Heyman v. M.L. Mktg. Co., 116 F.3d 91, 94
(4th Cir. 1997). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Jones v. Admin. Office, No. 1:15-cv-
03336-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016; Mar. 23, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2