UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1328
HEYDI LORENA RECINOS-ECHEVERRIA; D.A.D.,
Petitioners,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: November 8, 2016
Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy W. Davis, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY W. DAVIS, LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Andrew M. O’Malley, Senior Litigation
Counsel, Surell Brady, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Heydi Lorena Recinos-Echeverria and her minor child, natives
and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal
from the immigration judge’s denial of Recinos-Echeverria’s
requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the
transcript of Recinos-Echeverria’s merits hearing and all
supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does
not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual
findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v.
Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. See In re Recinos-Echeverria (B.I.A. Mar.
15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2