NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 21 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL GABINO MARTINEZ; et al., No. 14-17298
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00554-MMD-
VPC
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 16, 2016**
Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment in their action
alleging unreasonable delay in the processing of their grazing application by the
Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). We dismiss.
Plaintiffs brought their complaint under the Administrative Procedures Act,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
5 U.S.C. § 706(1), which provides the district court with authority to compel
agency action when that action is unreasonably delayed. During the pendency of
this case, the BLM acted on plaintiffs’ application by sending plaintiffs a letter on
March 14, 2014, acknowledging receipt of their application and pointing out
several deficiencies in the application. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ request to compel
agency action on their application is moot, and we dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
2 14-17298