Irizarry v St. Barnabas Hosp. |
2016 NY Slip Op 08335 |
Decided on December 13, 2016 |
Appellate Division, First Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 13, 2016
Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe, Feinman, Kahn, JJ.
2463 20626/09
v
St. Barnabas Hospital, et al., Defendants-Respondents. George Piccorelli, M.D., et al., Defendants.
Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, PC, Garden City (Chan Park of counsel), for appellant.
Garbarini & Scher, P.C., New York (William D. Buckley of counsel), for respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered March 6, 2015, dismissing the complaint as against defendants St. Barnabas Hospital, St. Barnabas Community Enterprises, Inc., Olusunmade Adekunle, D.O. s/h/a Ouisukmade Adekuhledo, M.D., and Francisco Solis, D.O. (collectively, St. Barnabas), and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, which granted said defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff alleges that she sustained injury to her left leg as a result of, inter alia, St. Barnabas staff members' failure to alert the attending physician, George Piccorelli, M.D., of the many issues plaintiff faced upon her return home before she was discharged from the hospital.
St. Barnabas established, via the testimony of its employees and plaintiff's hospital records, that its staff members, including its social workers and physical therapists, were working under Dr. Piccorelli's supervision in preparing plaintiff for discharge (see Bialick v Camins, 135 AD3d 479 [1st Dept 2016]). These workers are not liable to plaintiff, since they may not "ordinarily invade the area of a physician's responsibility" (Garzione v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 36 AD2d 390, 392 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 857 [1972]).
Defendants Adekunle and Solis were residents, also working under Dr. Piccorelli's supervision, and had no authority to discharge plaintiff, nor did they exercise any "independent medical judgment" in the decision to discharge her (see MacDonald v Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 136 AD3d 516, 516 [1st Dept 2016]).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 13, 2016
CLERK