| People v Hernandezgonza |
| 2016 NY Slip Op 08472 |
| Decided on December 15, 2016 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 15, 2016
Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, JJ.
2509 1859N/14
v
Constantin Hernandezgonza, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Frank Glaser of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered August 18, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted unlawful surveillance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four months, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant argues that his guilty plea was involuntary because the court failed to advise him of the possibility of deportation as a result of the plea (see People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168 [2013], cert denied 574 US __, 135 S. Ct. 90 [2014]). However, defendant has not established that the exception to the preservation rule applies, and we decline to review his claim in the interest of justice. The record demonstrates that defendant was made aware of the potential for deportation both before the plea and sentencing proceeding, and during that proceeding but before taking the plea. He thus had a practical ability to raise his claim (see id. at 182—183; People v Diakite, 135 AD3d 533 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1131 [2016]). As an alternative holding, we find that the court adequately warned defendant of the possibility of deportation before he took his plea (see Peque, 22 NY3d at 197).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 15, 2016
CLERK