In Re: Latricia L. Hardy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_______________________________
)
IN RE: LATRICIA L. HARDY, )
)
DEBTOR. )
-------------------------------)
)
LATRICIA L. HARDY, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 16-1968 (EGS)
)
BRYAN S. ROSS, and ALL CREDIT )
CONSIDERED MORTGAGE, INC., )
)
Appellees. )
)
)
LATRICIA L. HARDY, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 16-1969 (EGS)
)
BRYAN S. ROSS, and ALL CREDIT )
CONSIDERED MORTGAGE, INC., )
)
Appellees. )
)
)
LATRICIA L. HARDY, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 16-1970 (EGS)
)
BRYAN S. ROSS, and ALL CREDIT )
CONSIDERED MORTGAGE, INC., )
)
Appellees. )
)

1
 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Currently pending before the court is appellant LaTricia L.

Hardy’s motion for an emergency temporary restraining order,

which, based on the substance of the motion and the relief

requested, the Court construes as a motion to stay two

bankruptcy court orders pending appeal of those orders in this

Court. See Mot. for an Emergency TRO (“Appellant’s Mot.”), ECF

No. 10. Upon consideration of the motion, the responses thereto,

the applicable law, and the entire record, Ms. Hardy’s motion

for a stay pending appeal is DENIED.

I. Background

On May 31, 2016, Ms. Hardy filed a voluntary petition for

relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United

States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia. Appellee

ACC Mortgage’s Mem. in Opp. to Appellant’s Mot. for Emergency

TRO (“ACC’s Opp.”), ECF No. 11 at 2; Chapter 7 Trustee’s Opp. to

Debtor’s Mot. for TRO (“Trustee’s Opp.”), ECF No. 13 at 1;

Trustee’s Appellate Appendix (“AA”), ECF No. 12-1 at 21-22. On

June 14, 2016, the Chapter 13 Trustee moved to dismiss with

prejudice. ACC’s Opp. at 2. On June 17, 2016, Ms. Hardy filed a

motion to convert the case to Chapter 11. Id.; AA at 23-24. On

June 24, 2016, All Credit Considered Mortgage, Inc. (“ACC”), a

creditor holding a mortgage claim on Ms. Hardy’s co-owned

commercial property located at 1414-1416 Pennsylvania Avenue,

2
Southeast, Washington, D.C. 20003, in turn filed a motion to

dismiss with prejudice or, in the alternative, to convert the

case to Chapter 7 and opposed Ms. Hardy’s motion to convert to

Chapter 11. ACC’s Opp. at 2; AA at 25-42. The bankruptcy court

held a hearing on the Chapter 13 Trustee’s motion to dismiss and

Ms. Hardy’s motion to convert to Chapter 11 on July 15, 2016,

and on July 25, 2016, that court issued an order converting the

case from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7. ACC’s Opp. at 2-3; Trustee’s

Opp. at 1; AA at 123-25.1 On August 30, 2016, Ms. Hardy filed a

“motion requesting termination of conversion to Chapter 7

liquidation.” ACC’s Opp. at 3; AA at 149-50. The bankruptcy

court issued an order denying that motion on September 15, 2016.

ACC’s Opp. at 3; AA at 156. Ms. Hardy noticed her appeal of that

order in this Court on September 22, 2016. Notice of Appeal and

Statement of Election, ECF No. 1, Civil Action No. 16-1970.2

Meanwhile on August 17, 2016, the Chapter 7 Trustee, Bryan

S. Ross, filed a motion for an order approving the turnover of

real property——namely, Ms. Hardy’s co-owned commercial property

on Pennsylvania Avenue. ACC’s Opp. at 3; AA at 126-31. Ms. Hardy

1 The bankruptcy court’s docket includes only an audio recording
of the July 15, 2016 hearing. This Court requested that a
transcript of that hearing be prepared. That transcript is
attached to this Memorandum Opinion.
2 The Court sua sponte consolidated Ms. Hardy’s appeals, finding

that they involved common issues of law and fact and grew out of
the same event. Minute Entries of October 5, 2016, Civil Action
Nos. 16-1969 and 16-1970.
3
did not file any opposition to this motion, Trustee’s Opp. at 1,

though she contends that she failed to do so because she did not

receive notice of the Trustee’s turnover motion. Appellant’s

Mot. at 1; Appellant’s Merits Br., ECF No. 9 at 16-17. The

bankruptcy court granted the turnover motion on September 9,

2016. Appellant’s Mot. at 1; Trustee’s Opp. at 1; AA at 151-52.

Ms. Hardy noticed her appeal of that order in this Court on

September 22, 2016. Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election,

ECF No. 1.

On September 19, 2016, the bankruptcy court issued an

“order clarifying that no stay of the court’s turnover order is

in place pending disposition of the motion for a stay” of the

turnover order that Ms. Hardy had filed in that court on

September 16, 2016. AA at 157. Ms. Hardy noticed an appeal of

that clarifying order along with her two other appeals in this

Court on September 22, 2016. Notice of Appeal and Statement of

Election, ECF No. 1, Civil Action No. 16-1969. The bankruptcy

court subsequently denied Ms. Hardy’s motion for a stay of the

turnover order on September 27, 2016, ACC’s Opp. at 3, and on

October 1, 2016 denied an additional motion she had filed that

sought to stay the turnover order, the order denying

“termination” of conversion, and the clarifying order. Trustee’s

Opp. at 2.

4
 On November 21, 2016, Ms. Hardy filed in this Court a

motion for an emergency temporary restraining order, which, as

indicated above, is best construed as a motion for a stay of the

bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion to “terminate” the

conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7 and that court’s order

granting the Chapter 7 Trustee’s turnover motion pending appeal

of those orders in this Court. See Appellant’s Mot. at 3.

II. Analysis

“A motion for a stay pending appeal in a bankruptcy case is

reviewed under the same standard employed in evaluating a

request for a preliminary injunction.” In re Spenlinhauer, No.

15-14223, 2016 WL 526200, at *1 (D. Mass. Feb. 9, 2016).

Accordingly, to be entitled to a stay, Ms. Hardy must show: (1)

that she has a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2)

that she will suffer irreparable injury if injunctive relief is

denied; (3) that other interested parties will not suffer

substantial harm if injunctive relief is granted; and (4) that

the public interest favors the granting of injunctive relief, or

at least, that the granting of injunctive relief is not adverse

to the public interest. Wolensky Ltd. P’ship v. 2000

Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Inc., No. 91-2348, 1991 WL 229898, at *1

(D.D.C. Oct. 21, 1991).3 “A district court must balance the

3 As indicated, in addition to her appeals of the turnover order
and the order denying “termination” of conversion, Ms. Hardy has
5
strengths of the requesting party’s arguments in each of the

four required areas.” Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v.

England, 454 F.3d 290, 297 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (internal quotation

marks omitted). Here, that balance tips against granting Ms.

Hardy’s motion for a stay.

A. Likelihood of Success on the Merits

Ms. Hardy has not demonstrated a strong likelihood of

success on the merits of her appeal.

1. Appeal of Order Denying Motion Requesting
Termination of Conversion to Chapter 7

Ms. Hardy has not appealed the order converting the case

from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7; instead, as the Trustee points

out, Br. of Appellee Bryan Ross (“Trustee’s Merits Br.”), ECF

No. 12 at 6, she has appealed the order denying her motion

requesting “termination” of the conversion to Chapter 7. Notice

of Appeal and Statement of Election, ECF No. 1, Civil Action No.

16-1970. Thus she is effectively appealing an order denying a

motion for reconsideration. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure

noticed an appeal of the bankruptcy court order clarifying that
the turnover order was not stayed pending that court’s
disposition of her first motion for a stay. This Court construes
her appeal of that order to be an appeal of the bankruptcy
court’s orders of September 27, 2016 and October 1, 2016 that
actually denied her motions for a stay pending appeal. The four
factor preliminary injunction analysis is applicable to the
appeal from the bankruptcy court’s denial of those motions and
the motion for the stay pending appeal that was filed in this
Court.
6
9024 contemplates motions for reconsideration and applies

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 to such motions in the

bankruptcy realm. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024.4 On appeal, an order

denying a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of

discretion. In re Hahn, No. 12-13247, 2012 WL 5908703, at *1

(E.D. Mich. Nov. 26, 2012). The bankruptcy court can be said to

have abused its discretion if it “did not apply the correct

legal standard or misapprehended the underlying substantive law”

or if its ruling was not “within the scope of permissible

alternatives in light of the relevant factors and the reasons

given to support it.” Smalls v. United States, 471 F.3d 186, 191

(D.C. Cir. 2006). The bankruptcy court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Ms. Hardy’s motion for reconsideration of

its order converting the case to Chapter 7.

4 Rule 60(b) provides in full:

On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a
party or its legal representative from a final
judgment, order, or proceeding for the following
reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that,
with reasonable diligence, could not have been
discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule
59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic
or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an
opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the
judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged;
it is based on an earlier judgment that has been
reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is
no longer equitable; or (6) any other reason that
justifies relief.
7
 Ms. Hardy’s primary argument as to why the bankruptcy court

erred in denying her “termination” motion is that she is

involved in litigation in the District of Columbia courts with

creditor ACC concerning whether ACC’s mortgage as to her co-

owned Pennsylvania Avenue property is valid and enforceable,

and, accordingly, given that ACC’s claim is disputed based on

that litigation, ACC lacked the standing required to move for

dismissal or, in the alternative, conversion to Chapter 7 in the

bankruptcy court. See Appellant’s Mot. at 2-3; Appellant’s

Merits Br. at 5, 9-12, 16-19. This argument likely fails at the

starting gate because it challenges the merits of the underlying

order——the conversion order——rather than the order from which

appeal was taken——the order denying the motion for

reconsideration. See In re Schueller, 124 B.R. 98, 100 (D. Colo.

1991) (explaining that district court review of an appeal from a

denial of a motion for reconsideration is “limited to

considering whether the bankruptcy court abused its discretion

in denying the motion [for reconsideration], not whether the

court erred as a matter of law in granting the [underlying]

motion in the first place”).

In any event, Ms. Hardy’s argument is unavailing. First,

Chapter 13 specifies that “on request of a party in interest or

the United States trustee . . . the court may convert a case

under [Chapter 13] to a case under [C]hapter 7 . . . or may

8
dismiss a case under [Chapter 13], whichever is in the best

interests of creditors and the estate, for cause . . . .” 11

U.S.C. § 1307(c). Here, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a motion to

dismiss, separate and apart from creditor ACC’s motion to

dismiss or, in the alternative, to convert to Chapter 7. ACC’s

Opp. at 2. Based on just the Chapter 13 Trustee’s motion to

dismiss, the bankruptcy court was statutorily mandated to

consider conversion to Chapter 7 because section 1307(c)

requires a two-part analysis: (1) a determination of “cause”

justifying dismissal or conversion and then, if there is

“cause,” (2) a decision between dismissal or conversion based

not on which of those two options the moving party requests, but

rather based on “the best interests of creditors and the

estate.” In re Jensen, 425 B.R. 105, 109 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010)

(“The Court may convert the case rather than dismiss it if

conversion ‘is in the best interests of creditors and the

estate.’”) (quoting 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)); see In re Ontiveros,

No. 12-12457, 2014 WL 347726, at *4 (Bankr. D.N.M. Jan. 31,

2014) (finding “cause” to support conversion or dismissal and

then making decision between conversion or dismissal based on

“the best interests of creditors and the estate” even when the

moving parties had only requested dismissal). The bankruptcy

court in this case explicitly acknowledged the need to assess

“the best interests of creditors and the estate.” See July 15,

9
2016 Hrg. Tr. (“Hrg. Tr.”) at 61:13-16. Its subsequent

determination that conversion rather than dismissal was in “the

best interests of creditors and the estate” acknowledged and

considered ACC’s recommendation in favor of conversion, id. at

65:22-66:1, but did not depend on or require that

recommendation. See id. at 67:14-23. Thus ACC’s standing to move

to dismiss or, in the alternative, convert to Chapter 7 under

section 1307(c) is not a basis for concluding that the

bankruptcy court erred in converting the case to Chapter 7 and

eventually denying Ms. Hardy’s motion to “terminate” conversion;

the bankruptcy court could have properly taken those same

actions even if ACC had never filed its motion.

Second, even if the bankruptcy court’s decision to convert

to Chapter 7 (and its subsequent refusal not to “terminate” that

conversion) required a party to seek conversion——not just

dismissal——via a motion, ACC is a “party in interest” that has

standing to file that motion. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c). A “party

in interest” is any party “who has an actual pecuniary interest

in the case” or “who has a practical stake in the outcome of a

case,” or “who will be impacted in any significant way in the

case.” In re Sobczak, 369 B.R. 512, 518 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007).

As a party holding a mortgage claim on Ms. Hardy’s Pennsylvania

Avenue property, ACC is a “party in interest” no matter what

doctrinal formulation is used: It has “an actual pecuniary

10
interest” and a “practical stake” in the outcome of the case,

and it would be “impacted” in a “significant way” by decisions

made in the case. See In re Reynolds, 455 B.R. 312, 319 (D.

Mass. 2011) (finding that a bank “had standing to move to

convert the case as a ‘party in interest’ under 11 U.S.C. §

1307(c), regardless of whether it held secured or unsecured

debt”); In re Muscatello, No. 06-11143, 2006 WL 3437469, at *3

(N.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2006) (“A creditor is a ‘party in interest,’

and as such is an appropriate party to bring a motion to dismiss

or convert under § 1307(c).”)

ACC’s status as a “party in interest” is not diminished

because Ms. Hardy has disputed its claim. Although “party in

interest” is not defined in Chapter 13, courts rely on the

definition of “party in interest” provided in Chapter 11 when

construing Chapter 13’s “party in interest” language. See, e.g.,

In re Armstrong, 303 B.R. 213, 219 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2004)

(“[d]rawing guidance from § 1109(b)”). A Chapter 11 “party in

interest” includes “a creditor,” 11 U.S.C. § 1109(b), and “a

creditor” is statutorily defined as an “entity that has a claim

against the debtor,” id. § 101(10)(A) (emphasis added), and a

“claim” is a “right to payment, whether or not such right is

reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed,

contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal,

equitable, secured, or unsecured.” Id. § 101(5)(A) (emphasis

11
added). Thus, as would be the case in the Chapter 11 context,

see, e.g., In re Abijoe Realty Corp., 943 F.2d 121, 125 (1st

Cir. 1991), in the Chapter 13 context ACC is a “party in

interest” even as a creditor whose claim is disputed. 5

Ms. Hardy also argues that the bankruptcy court erred in

converting her case and subsequently denying her motion to

“terminate” that conversion because it did not consider her

motion to convert to Chapter 11, Appellant’s Merits Br. at 8;

did not consider her argument, based on the ongoing litigation

in the District of Columbia courts, concerning ACC’s standing to

file a motion under section 1307(c) such that she was denied due

process, Appellant’s Merits Br. at 8, 12, 18; Mot. to Take

Judicial Notice, ECF No. 14 at 1-3; and did not base its

conversion determination on sufficient evidence, amounting to

another violation of due process. See generally Mot. to Take

Judicial Notice. These arguments are without merit. The

bankruptcy court considered and rejected Ms. Hardy’s motion to

5 Ms. Hardy also seems to argue that 11 U.S.C. § 303 concerning
involuntary cases under Chapters 7 or 11 supports her theory
that ACC lacked standing to file a motion to dismiss or convert
under 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c). See Appellant’s Merits Br. at 10-11,
14 (citing In re Green Hills Dev. Co., 445 B.R. 647 (Bankr. S.D.
Miss. 2011)). Section 303 specifies that only a creditor that
has a claim that is “not . . . the subject of a bona fide
dispute” can file a petition to commence an involuntary case. 11
U.S.C. § 303(b)(1). That requirement for an involuntary Chapter
7 or Chapter 11 case does not mean that a creditor lacks
standing to file a motion to dismiss or convert a voluntary
Chapter 13 case.
12
convert to Chapter 11. Hrg. Tr. at 64:22-65:13, 66:24-25. It

also heard testimony concerning the litigation in the District

of Columbia courts involving Ms. Hardy and ACC, id. at 30:18-22,

31:17-21, 38:17-40:15, and its conclusion that conversion to

Chapter 7 was warranted was based on its reasoned assessment of

what was in the best interests of creditors and the estate, id.

at 67:14-23, and that determination, as explained above, would

have been proper regardless of ACC’s motion to dismiss or

convert. See id. at 69:9-10 (“We’re here for a hearing, it’s the

trustee’s motion to dismiss.”). And the court grounded its

decision to convert to Chapter 7 on the evidence that had been

presented to it and thoroughly explained its legal conclusions.

Id. at 63:18-68:16.

To the extent that Ms. Hardy’s “termination” motion could

be construed as a motion to dismiss her Chapter 7 case under 11

U.S.C. § 707, the bankruptcy court’s denial of that motion was

not improper because Ms. Hardy did not make a showing of cause

and did not demonstrate why a dismissal was justified. See Terry

v. Sparrow, 328 B.R. 450, 455 (M.D.N.C. 2005).

Accordingly, Ms. Hardy does not have a strong likelihood of

success on the merits of her appeal of the order denying her

motion to “terminate” the conversion to Chapter 7.

13
 2. Appeal of Order Granting Turnover Motion

Ms. Hardy has also not demonstrated a strong likelihood of

success on the merits of her appeal of the order granting the

motion for turnover of her property on Pennsylvania Avenue. As a

preliminary matter, Ms. Hardy filed no opposition to the

Trustee’s turnover motion in the bankruptcy court. She alleges

that she did not receive notice of the turnover motion,

Appellant’s Mot. at 1; Appellant’s Merits Br. at 16-17, but the

bankruptcy court’s docket shows a Notice of Motion and

Opportunity to Object that was filed on August 17, 2016. Bankr.

No. 16-280, ECF No. 64. That Notice states that “Bryan S. Ross,

Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of LaTricia L.

Hardy. [sic] has filed an [sic] Motion for Turnover of Real

Property/1414-1416 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Washington, D.C.”

and explains that if a written response is not filed within 21

days “the Court may deem any opposition waived, treat the motion

as conceded, and issue an order granting the relief without

further notice of hearing.” Id. at 1. That Notice was mailed to

Ms. Hardy. Id. at 2. By not asserting any arguments in

opposition to the turnover motion below, Ms. Hardy has waived

the arguments she musters on appeal. Cf. District of Columbia v.

Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d 1077, 1084 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (“It is

well settled that issues and legal theories not asserted at the

District Court level ordinarily will not be heard on appeal.”).

14
 Even if Ms. Hardy had not waived her arguments in

opposition to the turnover motion, she still would not likely be

successful on the merits of her appeal. The turnover provision

of the Bankruptcy Code states in relevant part:

an entity, other than a custodian, in
possession, custody, or control, during the
case, of property that the trustee may use,
sell, or lease under section 363 of this title
. . . shall deliver to the trustee, and account
for, such property or the value of such
property, unless such property is of
inconsequential value or benefit to the
estate.

11 U.S.C. § 542(a). “The first requirement of Code § 542(a) is

that the property be property of the estate.” In re Weiss-Wolf,

Inc., 60 B.R. 969, 975 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986). And “[p]roperty

of the estate is defined by 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1) as ‘all legal

[or] equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the

commencement of the case.’” In re Pyatt, 486 F.3d 423, 427 (8th

Cir. 2007). “This definition of estate property is intentionally

broad and will reach to bring within the estate every

conceivable interest that the debtor may have in property . . .

.” In re Coomer, 375 B.R. 800, 804 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2007).

Under this definition, Ms. Hardy’s ownership stake in the

Pennsylvania Avenue commercial property appears to be “property

of the estate.” The other elements of a section 542(a) turnover

action also appear to be satisfied. Ms. Hardy had “possession,

custody, or control” of the Pennsylvania Avenue property during

15
her bankruptcy case, see Shapiro v. Henson, 739 F.3d 1198, 1204

(9th Cir. 2014), and the trustee may “use, sell, or lease” that

property. See 11 U.S.C. § 542(a).

Ms. Hardy argues that turnover was improper because there

is an ongoing dispute between her and ACC regarding the validity

and enforceability of the mortgage encumbering the Pennsylvania

Avenue property. She argues that that ongoing litigation

constitutes a dispute as to the property that was the subject of

the turnover action, making turnover impermissible. Appellant’s

Merits Br. at 10, 19 (citing 11 U.S.C. § 542(b)). But as the

Chapter 7 Trustee points out, Trustee’s Merits Br. at 18, a

turnover proceeding is impermissible when “the amounts owed to

the Debtor are contested.” In re N. Parent, Inc., 221 B.R. 609,

626 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1998) (emphasis added); see In re National

Jockey Club, 451 B.R. 825, 830 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2011) (“There

is a difference between property potentially owed to a debtor

and property owned by the debtor.”) (emphasis in original); In

re Olympia Holding Corp., 221 B.R. 995, 998 (Bankr. M.D. Fla.

1998) (“The turnover provision provided by § 542 applies to

tangible property and money due to the debtor without dispute

which are fully matured and payable on demand.”). Although there

appears to be a dispute about what debt Ms. Hardy owes to ACC,

there is not a dispute about amounts or property owed to Ms.

Hardy. And although turnover is impermissible as to assets

16
“whose title is in dispute,” United States v. Inslaw, Inc., 932

F.2d 1467, 1472 (D.C. Cir. 1991), Ms. Hardy does not explain how

the dispute between her and ACC in the District of Columbia

courts puts title to the Pennsylvania Avenue property in

dispute.6 Accordingly, it does not appear that the bankruptcy

court erred in ordering the turnover of her Pennsylvania Avenue

property.

Ms. Hardy also argues that the bankruptcy court lacked

jurisdiction to order turnover because her dispute with ACC gave

rise to a “non-core” proceeding or, alternatively, because Stern

v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011) has called into question the

jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court even as to those proceedings

designated as “core” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). See

Appellant’s Merits Br. at 20. But the first jurisdictional

argument is unlikely to succeed because, given that Ms. Hardy

has not explained how her dispute with ACC puts title to the

Pennsylvania Avenue property in dispute, the turnover proceeding

was a “core,” as opposed to a “non-core,” proceeding. See In re

6 In any event, the dispute that makes turnover inappropriate
must be a “legitimate dispute.” In re Conex Holings, LLC, 518
B.R. 792, 801 (Bankr. D. Del. 2014) (emphasis added). Here,
aside from alleging that the ongoing litigation in the District
of Columbia courts gives rise to a dispute, Ms. Hardy does not
explain how that dispute is a legitimate one. It appears not to
be, as the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued an
Order rejecting seven distinct arguments Ms. Hardy made
challenging the validity and enforceability of her loan
agreement with ACC. See AA at 55-62.
17
Soundview Elite Ltd., No. 14-3179, 2014 WL 2998529, at *3

(S.D.N.Y. July 3, 2014) (explaining that when “the turnover

statute is used to recover assets with disputed title when the

estate’s claim of ownership is legitimately debatable,” such an

action can only be understood as a “non-core rather than core

proceeding[]”) (internal quotation marks omitted). And the

second jurisdictional argument is likely to fail because “the

reported post-Stern decisions have overwhelmingly held that

bankruptcy judges can constitutionally enter final judgments in

turnover actions.” In re Pali Holdings, Inc., 488 B.R. 841, 850

(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013).

Accordingly, Ms. Hardy does not have a strong likelihood of

success on the merits of her appeal of the bankruptcy court’s

turnover order.

B. Irreparable Injury

Ms. Hardy identifies “the loss of her commercial property”

as “significant and ongoing” and “irreparable injury.”

Appellant’s Mot. at 2-3. ACC and the Chapter 7 Trustee counter

that Ms. Hardy will not be harmed “by the orderly liquidation of

property as required under the Bankruptcy Code.” Trustee’s Opp.

at 3; ACC’s Opp. at 6. Although the Court is sympathetic to Ms.

Hardy’s desire to retain her commercial property, she has not

explained the nature of her injury aside from calling it

“significant,” “ongoing,” and “irreparable.” Appellant’s Mot. at

18
2-3. These conclusory labels do not demonstrate irreparable

injury. See Brown v. District of Columbia, 888 F. Supp. 2d 28,

31 (D.D.C. 2012) (explaining that in the analogous preliminary

injunction context “[t]he movant . . . carries the burden of

persuasion”). While being evicted from a home might amount to

irreparable injury, see Edwards v. Habib, 366 F.2d 628, 630

(D.C. Cir. 1965) (Skelly Wright, J., concurring) (“Certainly

being evicted into the street is irreparable damage.”), Ms.

Hardy has not explained how turnover of commercial property

amounts to a similarly irreparable injury.

C. Substantial Harm to Other Parties

Ms. Hardy has also failed to demonstrate that other

interested parties will not suffer substantial harm if

injunctive relief is granted. She asserts that any injury to the

Chapter 7 Trustee is outweighed by the injury she will suffer as

a result of a stay not being granted. Appellant’s Mot. at 3. But

issuing a stay and delaying turnover potentially “harms

creditors who are entitled to payment.” Trustee’s Opp. at 4.

Thus this factor also weighs against staying the bankruptcy

court’s orders pending appeal.

D. The Public Interest

Ms. Hardy asserts that the “public interest favors a

[s]tay” because she suggests that “fundamental constitutional

rights” were not upheld in the bankruptcy court and because

19
“bankruptcy issues” were not “carefully considered.” See

Appellant’s Mot. at 3. But Ms. Hardy’s constitutional rights

appear to have been adequately safeguarded in the bankruptcy

court, see supra Part II.A.1 (discussing Ms. Hardy’s due process

allegations), and the issues of bankruptcy law were carefully

considered. Ms. Hardy thus has not shown that the public

interest in this case favors a stay pending appeal.

III. Conclusion

Because Ms. Hardy has not carried her burden of showing

that “all four factors, taken together, weigh in favor” of a

stay, see Davis v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 571 F.3d 1288,

1292 (D.C. Cir. 2009), the Court DENIES her motion for a stay.

An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SO ORDERED.

Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan
United States District Judge
December 29, 2016

20
 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LATRICIA LEE HARDY, )
)
Debtor, ) BP No. 16-280
)
) Washington, D.C.
vs. ) July 15, 2016
) 10:11 a.m.
BRYAN S. ROSS, ET AL., )
)
Trustees. )
___________________________________)

TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION TO CONVERT CASE
BEFORE THE S. MARTIN TEEL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

APPEARANCES:
For the Debtor: Latricia Lee Hardy, Pro Se
1006 15th Street, SE
Washington, D.C. 20003
(202) 546-3198
For All Credit Considered
Mortgage, Incorporated: Michael Ostroff

Cynthia Niklas

Court Reporter: William P. Zaremba, RMR, CRR
Official Court Reporter
U.S. Courthouse
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Room 6511
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 354-3249
Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography; transcript
produced by computer-aided transcription

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 2

1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 THE COURT: Call the next case, please.

3 DEPUTY CLERK: The next case on the calendar is

4 16-280, Latricia Hardy.

5 The matter before the Court are motion to dismiss

6 case with prejudice filed by Cynthia Niklas, and a motion to

7 convert case to Chapter 11 filed by Latricia Hardy.

8 Will the parties please come forward and state

9 your name for appearance.

10 MS. HARDY: Latricia Hardy, debtor.

11 MR. OSTROFF: Good morning, Your Honor.

12 Michael Ostroff on behalf of All Credit Considered Mortgage,

13 Incorporated. We're a secured creditor in this case.

14 We've also filed an opposition to the motion to

15 convert to Chapter 11, as well as a motion to dismiss with

16 prejudice or convert.

17 I note that's not on the docket today; however,

18 debtor has filed an answer to that, to the extent Your Honor

19 is willing to hear information related to that as well.

20 (Pause)

21 MS. NIKLAS: This case is set only for

22 confirmation hearing, although -- and motion to dismiss.

23 THE COURT: I think that's only for a hearing on a

24 motion to convert as well.

25 Just a moment.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 3

1 This is on a motion to convert to 11.

2 And trustees filed a motion.

3 MS. NIKLAS: Yeah. My motion is to dismiss the

4 case. The debtor filed a motion to convert to Chapter 11,

5 and the creditor filed a motion to convert to Chapter 7.

6 The problem here is that the -- there's been no

7 341 meeting. The debtor did not appear at the rescheduled

8 meeting after -- at the original meeting of creditors on

9 July 11.

10 And her Schedules show that she is ineligible for

11 Chapter 13 relief or any relief. She has scheduled income

12 of zero, expenses of zero, and disposable of zero. She's

13 made no plan payments, and I'm requesting that the case be

14 dismissed.

15 I have little information about the debtor,

16 because she did not appear at the meeting of creditors this

17 Monday.

18 THE COURT: Mr. Ostroff.

19 MR. OSTROFF: Good afternoon, Your Honor.

20 Our firm and our client concur with the trustee's

21 motion to dismiss, to the extent that there's a dismissal.

22 And if there is a conversion, we'd like to see a conversion

23 to Chapter 7, not Chapter 11.

24 So trustees pointed, but the Schedules clearly

25 indicate, or, as presented to the Court, indicate that there

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 4

1 is absolutely no income, there is only one debt listed on

2 the Schedules, and that's the ACC Mortgage. It's a mortgage

3 claim on a property that the debtor did not disclose any

4 interest in. She listed two properties on Schedule A/B

5 Part 1; one on 15th Street -- and let me make sure it's

6 Street, not Avenue -- 15th Street, Southeast; and one on

7 Q Street, Southwest.

8 The property in question is on Pennsylvania

9 Avenue, is a commercial property and is subject to the

10 mortgage. That property, however, is not disclosed anywhere

11 on her Schedules, other than being the place of business for

12 an LLC she listed.

13 In addition to that, on information and belief,

14 the debtor owns two or three additional properties in which

15 her name is on title, which are not listed in the Schedules.

16 It is hard to believe that debtor has no other

17 creditors, but she was not at our meeting of creditors, she

18 has listed no other creditors in her Schedules.

19 I note she filed for installments of the filing

20 fee. She did make that payment eventually. And then she

21 did file the fee for a motion to convert; however, she's

22 demonstrated no ability to sustain any plan of

23 reorganization, whether or not under Chapter 13 or 11.

24 I note that her Chapter 13 plan stated that it

25 would pay all 1322(b)(5) claims in full, proposing over a

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 5

1 $5,000 a month payment, while maintaining direct payments to

2 the mortgage -- well, direct payments to secure creditors.

3 She has not made any payment to her secured

4 creditor as of this date. Additionally, the debtor has not,

5 to our motion -- which, again, was not listed as being here

6 but there was no response filed -- the debtor did not

7 address any of these concerns. The debtor did not address

8 any of the income concerns, any of the lack of information

9 in her Schedules pertaining to these other properties; the

10 fact that there's a co-debtor involved in this bankruptcy.

11 She did not address any of that. Instead, she focused on

12 the viability on an underlying Superior Court case, which

13 has already been decided in favor of ACC Mortgage and which

14 she appealed; however, that's stayed pending this

15 bankruptcy.

16 She went to the heart of whether a motion to

17 dismiss was cognizable. But all of her references refer to

18 the D.C. Superior Court case, not this bankruptcy matter.

19 Additionally, she argues that there's no bad

20 faith, simply because she thought she could get relief in

21 Chapter 13, and now her understanding is that she can --

22 that Chapter 11 is for commercial businesses so she's

23 allowed to do that.

24 She made no reference to gross revenues, net

25 revenues. No reference to how this business operates.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 6

1 As far as we know from the Statement of Financial Affairs,

2 the only business she owns is a beauty parlor held in an

3 LLC, but that's not the owner of the commercial property.

4 So if she's contending that she owns the

5 commercial property as well as the commercial business, she

6 has multiple commercial ventures which are not disclosed and

7 not discussed.

8 I, as part of this proffer, think, on its face,

9 debtor filing these Schedules and these statements under the

10 penalty of perjury and not taking any action to amend these

11 documents after our motion was filed and our opposition was

12 filed, is clearly bad faith. She is not looking to

13 re-organize this debt. She was looking to stay a

14 foreclosure and sale of her property, which has already been

15 litigated in the D.C. Superior Court.

16 Unless Your Honor has any questions for me, I will

17 reserve on questions for the debtor later.

18 THE COURT: Ms. Hardy, I'll hear from you.

19 MS. HARDY: Thank you.

20 Good morning, Judge.

21 I agree that -- partly what he says, because when

22 I filed the Chapter 13, I unknowingly knew exactly what to

23 do and what to put on the papers. So that's why I came here

24 to seek legal advice here at the Bankruptcy Court. And at

25 that time, I had decided to do the Chapter 11, because 13

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 7

1 was under -- was putting it under the business, but the

2 business didn't own anything. So he said I need to put it

3 under my name personally and the property and file for

4 Chapter 11 -- would be more sufficient for the commercial

5 property.

6 And I apologize to the Court and Ms. Niklas for

7 any confusion that I may have occurred -- concurred.

8 THE COURT: Ms. Hardy, thank you very much.

9 MS. HARDY: Excuse me?

10 THE COURT: Thank you very much.

11 MS. HARDY: Okay.

12 THE COURT: Ms. Niklas, do you want to put on a

13 case so we have an evidentiary record?

14 MS. NIKLAS: Yes. Thank you. I would like to

15 call the debtor to the stand.

16 THE COURT: Miss, please.

17 DEPUTY CLERK: Please raise your right hand.

18 (Witness is placed under oath.)

19 DEPUTY CLERK: Please have a seat and state your

20 name for me.

21 THE WITNESS: Latricia Hardy.

22 - - -

23 LATRICIA HARDY, WITNESS FOR THE DEBTOR, SWORN

24 DIRECT EXAMINATION

25 - - -

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 8

1 BY MS. NIKLAS:

2 Q What is you address, please?

3 A 1006 15th Street, Southeast, Washington, D.C.,

4 20003.

5 Q How long have you lived there?

6 A Over 20 years.

7 Q Have you lived there continuously for the last

8 three years?

9 A Yes.

10 Q How many people live there with you?

11 A Three. Well, three altogether.

12 Q Three?

13 A Yeah.

14 Q And who are they?

15 A My granddaughter and my son.

16 Q How many -- two sons?

17 A One son.

18 Q So one son.

19 Are you married?

20 A I'm widowed.

21 Q Have you filed a bankruptcy case before?

22 A No.

23 Q Did you file your tax returns for 2015?

24 A Yes.

25 Q Federal and State?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 9

1 A Yes.

2 Q Did you file timely or late?

3 A Timely.

4 Q What about 2014?

5 A Correct. Yes.

6 Q '13 and '12?

7 A Yes.

8 Q Have you turned over those tax returns to my

9 office?

10 A No, I didn't.

11 Q Where do you work?

12 A Capitol Hill Beauty Salon.

13 Q Are you self-employed?

14 A Yes.

15 Q Do you earn any income from that job?

16 A Yes, I do.

17 Q Did you schedule that income on your Schedules?

18 A No, because currently I haven't been as -- not

19 active right now.

20 But, no, I didn't. I didn't complete the whole

21 form, no, I didn't.

22 Q Who filed your Schedules for you?

23 A I did by myself.

24 Q Who helped you in filing this case?

25 A I did.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 10

1 Q Nobody helped you?

2 A No.

3 Q Where did you get the idea?

4 A Of what?

5 Q Of filing a Chapter 13?

6 A Just talking to some friends or whatever, and they

7 said 13 would save the property.

8 But after me researching -- because everything

9 came sort of fast and I really had no time to do a diligent

10 research. So after talking with the attorneys here, I see

11 that I should have filed it Chapter 11. At that time, I

12 asked to convert.

13 Q You talked to attorneys here?

14 A Yes.

15 Q And who did you talk to?

16 A At the bankruptcy, legal advice downstairs.

17 Q Did you report any income in 2015 on your taxes?

18 A On my taxes? Yes.

19 Q What was the income, your adjusted gross income?

20 A It was around 20-.

21 Q 20- --

22 A 20,000.

23 Q Do you have any people working for you?

24 A I have space rented out.

25 Q Do you keep records of your income and your

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 11

1 expenses?

2 A Yes.

3 Q Did you receive a refund in 2015?

4 A Yes.

5 Q And how much of a tax refund did you receive from

6 IRS?

7 A I think it was 3 -- 3,900.

8 Q And what about from D.C. Government?

9 A I can't say right off, but maybe 1,800, something

10 like that.

11 Q So 20,000 is what you earned last year?

12 A Under the LLC. But I do have income coming from a

13 couple other properties, yeah.

14 Q Okay. So let's start with your income from

15 20,000. Your Schedules ask you to state what your income is

16 from your business. That would be around 16- or 1,700 a

17 month; is that right?

18 A I get --

19 Q If that's your income?

20 A 16- or 1,700 a month?

21 Q Okay.

22 A Yeah, something like that.

23 Q Did you handwrite your Schedules on Schedule I --

24 A Yes.

25 Q -- that says what your income is?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 12

1 And you say "employed" or "not employed."

2 Do you remember what you filed?

3 A I might have put zero, because at the time,

4 I haven't been doing anything. I didn't know if you needed

5 it right then or from prior.

6 Q So if you schedule -- you crossed off the box that

7 says you're unemployed; is that true?

8 A I haven't been working, but I am -- I have the

9 business, but it hasn't been active.

10 Q Do you have an occupation?

11 A No. I just run the business. I don't do hair

12 myself.

13 THE COURT: How long has the business not been

14 active?

15 THE WITNESS: It's just for a couple of months.

16 It just -- it's sort of, you know, vacant, the building is

17 vacant. I just have -- I do have an employee or two working

18 there. Not employee, but a self-employee, who rents space

19 there.

20 THE COURT: And who are they?

21 THE WITNESS: Who are that?

22 THE COURT: Yes.

23 THE WITNESS: Ms. Sadies [phonetic], Ms. Gracias.

24 THE COURT: And how much does she pay you?

25 THE WITNESS: It's 250 a week.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 13

1 THE COURT: $250 a week?

2 THE WITNESS: Yes.

3 BY MS. HARDY:

4 Q You filed this case on May 31?

5 A Yeah.

6 Q On May 31, was your business in operation?

7 A It was like what I just told the Judge, just one

8 employee at that time.

9 Q One employee paying you rent only?

10 A Yeah.

11 Q At 250 a week?

12 A Yes.

13 Q Okay. There's a section on the Schedules --

14 THE COURT: You say she's an employee but you --

15 THE WITNESS: Well, not employee, a self-employed.

16 THE COURT: And she --

17 THE WITNESS: She pays rent.

18 THE COURT: -- she pays rent to you for the space?

19 THE WITNESS: Yes.

20 BY MS. NIKLAS:

21 Q What does the person do, does she cut hair?

22 A Yes. She works on hair.

23 Q Does she have customers?

24 A Yes.

25 Q Does she pay you a percent of what she earns, in

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 14

1 addition to the rent?

2 A No.

3 Q So there's no other fee that you get from this

4 person except rent?

5 A That's all I get from her, yes.

6 Q And how long has she been paying you rent?

7 A Oh, for five-years-plus.

8 Q And so on Schedule I, it asked if you have rental

9 income, and you put zero -- you put nothing. Is there a

10 reason why you didn't report the rental income?

11 A Well, at the time -- okay. I do agree everything

12 wasn't complete. I was hoping to maybe see someone to make

13 sure of what all to put exactly. So that was my reasoning

14 for not completing it fully. But not deceiving, but,

15 you know, like I didn't know exactly what to do. So that's

16 why I came in to see the bankruptcy attorney and have been

17 seeing him since every two weeks.

18 Q Has this bankruptcy attorney suggested that you

19 amend your schedules?

20 A Well, yes, after I convert.

21 Q After you convert?

22 A Yes.

23 Q In addition to the rental income of 250 from the

24 business, do you receive income from any other source?

25 A Other properties.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 15

1 I'm looking for income to come in for the salon,

2 but I have prospered -- people coming in to rent.

3 Q When you filed your case on May 31, did you

4 have -- already have income coming from any other source?

5 A Yes.

6 Q How much did you -- how much have you been

7 receiving as of May 31?

8 A For -- it's another property that I get 1,800 a

9 month from.

10 Q 1,800. And where is that property located?

11 A It's 90 Q Street.

12 Q 90 Q Street?

13 A Yes. Southwest.

14 Q Who lives there?

15 A My son.

16 Q How old is he?

17 A 22.

18 Q Does he have a job?

19 A 25. I'm sorry.

20 Q Does he have a job?

21 A Yes.

22 Q Where does he work?

23 A Well, he just changed jobs. I'm not sure what job

24 it is. But his girlfriend's the one who the rent come from.

25 Q And is the rent current?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 16

1 A Yes, it is.

2 Q So you receive 1,800 from your son and girlfriend,

3 in addition to the 250?

4 A Yes.

5 Q What other income do you receive?

6 A It's 500 from both condos.

7 Q From two condos?

8 A Yes.

9 THE COURT: And where are those located?

10 THE WITNESS: In Maryland.

11 THE COURT: What are the addresses?

12 THE WITNESS: 5211 Newton Street.

13 BY MS. NIKLAS:

14 Q Can you repeat that?

15 A 5211 Newton Street, Bladensburg, Maryland, and

16 3107 Good Hope Avenue, Temple Hills, Maryland.

17 Q Is the -- how much is the rent from each one?

18 A 500.

19 Q Is it 500 each --

20 A Yes. Each.

21 Q -- or together?

22 So it's a thousand total?

23 A Total, yes.

24 Q Okay. What other rental income do you receive?

25 A That's it for right now, but I'm looking for more

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 17

1 to come in.

2 Q Do you receive any disability or any part-time --

3 A I don't.

4 Q -- income or income from anybody else?

5 A No.

6 Q Does anybody owe you any money?

7 A No. Not exactly.

8 Q The property on 15th Street, when did you buy it?

9 A I've been there for over 20 years. I don't know.

10 It was my husband's, him and I.

11 Q Are you the sole owner?

12 A Yes. I am now.

13 Q Is there a mortgage?

14 A Yes, it was a mortgage. Well, his father was

15 taking care of that since he's deceased.

16 Q What are the monthly mortgage payments?

17 THE COURT: Let her finish the answer.

18 Your father?

19 THE WITNESS: His father was taking care of the

20 mortgage.

21 THE COURT: Your deceased husband's father was

22 taking care of it?

23 THE WITNESS: Yes.

24 THE COURT: Is it still owing?

25 THE WITNESS: Yes, it is.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 18

1 THE COURT: And is the father still taking care of

2 it?

3 THE WITNESS: Well, he's deceased now also.

4 THE COURT: So who's taking care of the mortgage?

5 THE WITNESS: I don't know if it's paid off or if

6 it's still a pending mortgage. I have to look into that.

7 THE COURT: Who's the mortgagee?

8 THE WITNESS: American Servicing Center.

9 THE COURT: Go ahead, Ms. Niklas.

10 BY MS. NIKLAS:

11 Q You scheduled ACC Mortgage with a $303,000 claim.

12 Is that the mortgage company?

13 A That's the mortgage company, yes.

14 Q On 15th Street?

15 A No. On 1414 Pennsylvania Avenue, on the

16 commercial property.

17 Q That's where the beauty shop is?

18 A Yes.

19 Q And what are the monthly payments to ACC Mortgage?

20 A He had down 2,400.

21 Q A month?

22 A Yes.

23 Q How many months were you behind on May 31 when you

24 filed the case?

25 A The total amount I guess what they have 303- total

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 19

1 amount, because there hadn't been a payment because they

2 took me to court right after the mortgage was consummated,

3 because they didn't have a power of attorney. So the

4 payments that I did send them, they sent back, and they

5 proceeded with a court hearing to --

6 THE COURT: You say 303-. What does that mean,

7 303,000?

8 THE WITNESS: Thousand. It was 276-, but I guess

9 they adding interest in ever since the mortgage.

10 BY MS. NIKLAS:

11 Q Ms. Hardy, you scheduled that debtor's 330,000.

12 Is that the arrears to the mortgage company or the whole

13 debt?

14 A The whole debt.

15 Q What are the arrears amount, do you know?

16 A I don't know.

17 Q How many months were you behind when you filed

18 this case?

19 A I mean, there --

20 Q When's the last time you made a payment?

21 A I haven't made a payment. Well, the payment I

22 made, they sent back. So it was at the beginning of the

23 loan.

24 Q So you don't know how much the arrears would be?

25 A No.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 20

1 Q Can you estimate, a couple hundred thousand?

2 A No, it's not that much. The arrears maybe about

3 70,000.

4 Q 70-, you think?

5 A Yeah.

6 Q Is there a second mortgage on that -- on your

7 beauty shop?

8 A No.

9 Q Is there a condominium fee or an HO fee?

10 A No.

11 Q A tax lien or a judgment lien?

12 A Not yet.

13 Q Not yet?

14 A Yeah.

15 Q You scheduled your address as 15th Street. Do you

16 owe that too?

17 A Yeah. That's where I live.

18 Q Did you buy that property?

19 A Yes.

20 Q You own that?

21 A Yes.

22 Q And is there a mortgage on that property?

23 A It is a mortgage, I suspect. It's still a more --

24 that was the mortgage that was in my husband's name.

25 Q What's the mortgage company's name?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 21

1 A American Servicing Center.

2 Q Did you schedule that creditor on your papers, on

3 your schedules?

4 A No.

5 Q Because why?

6 A I only did ACC Mortgage.

7 Q I see.

8 So on your principal residence, you have a

9 mortgage by American Servicing?

10 A Yes.

11 Q What is the total debt?

12 A I don't know. I have to get that to you.

13 Q Is it a couple hundred thousand?

14 A It wouldn't be over 100-.

15 Q Are there monthly payments that are due?

16 A I don't know.

17 Q You don't know?

18 A No.

19 Q Who's making -- is anybody making payments to

20 American Servicing on your principal residence?

21 A His father was, but he's now deceased.

22 Q So you're not making the payments?

23 A No.

24 Q Is there a second mortgage on 15th Street?

25 A No.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 22

1 Q Is there a homeowner's or condo fee --

2 A No.

3 Q -- tax lien, judgment lien --

4 A No.

5 Q -- on 15th Street?

6 A No.

7 Q And you own property on 90 Q Street, which you

8 scheduled?

9 A Yes.

10 Q Is there a mortgage on that property?

11 A No.

12 Q There's no debt at all?

13 A Well, there's a mortgage, yeah, but -- it is a

14 mortgage.

15 Q There is?

16 A Yeah.

17 Q And who's the mortgage company on 90 Q Street?

18 A It's Dan Caplan, Daniel Caplan.

19 Q Can you spell that?

20 A D-a-n-i-e-l. Caplan, C-a-p-l-, I think it's a-n.

21 Q Is he the prior owner?

22 A Yes.

23 Q How much do you owe Daniel Caplan if you pay him

24 in full?

25 A 180,000.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 23

1 Q Are you making payments -- are you supposed to

2 make payments on a monthly basis to Daniel Caplan?

3 A No, it's no monthly payments at this time.

4 Q Did you schedule this creditor?

5 A No.

6 Q Is there a second mortgage on 90 Q Street?

7 A No.

8 Q A homeowner's fee, condo fee, tax lien or judgment

9 lien?

10 A No.

11 Q Nothing?

12 A No.

13 Q And you don't make the payments because why?

14 A Well, that one's in court also.

15 Q In Superior Court?

16 A Yes.

17 Q There's a different lawsuit than the one you

18 scheduled?

19 A Yes.

20 Q Are you the sole owner of 90 Q Street?

21 A Yes.

22 Q This is where your son lives?

23 A Yes.

24 Q And you own property, a condo in Newton Street?

25 A Yes.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 24

1 Q Are you the sole owner of that condo?

2 A Yes.

3 Q Is there a mortgage on that condo?

4 A No.

5 Q Who bought that condo?

6 A I did.

7 Q Did you pay cash?

8 A No. I had a loan on it.

9 Q You had a loan with who?

10 A It was -- I think the last one was with ACC

11 Mortgage.

12 Q And how much do you owe ACC Mortgage, if at all,

13 in regard to this condo on Newton Street?

14 A I owe them nothing.

15 Q Pardon me? You owe nothing?

16 A Nothing. Zero.

17 Q Was it paid in full at some point?

18 A Yes.

19 Q What is the value of that condo?

20 A About 100,000.

21 Q Do you remember what you paid for it when you

22 bought it?

23 A About 28,000, 30,000.

24 Q Is there a condo fee?

25 A Excuse me?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 25

1 Q Is there a condo fee?

2 A Condo fee, yes.

3 Q And who's the condo fee company?

4 A Bladensburg Woods Condominiums [phonetic].

5 Q What are the condo fees per month?

6 A $250.

7 Q Are they current when you filed your case?

8 A No, they're not current, but...

9 Q How many months were you behind to the condo

10 company?

11 A It's about a year.

12 Q Did you schedule Bladensburg condo company?

13 A Did I schedule them?

14 Q That creditor, yes?

15 A No, I didn't.

16 Q Did you schedule Newton Street, the property?

17 A No.

18 Q You also have property on Good Hope Avenue?

19 A Yes.

20 Q Is that also in Maryland?

21 A Yes.

22 Q Is that -- are you the sole owner?

23 A Yes.

24 Q When did you buy that?

25 A Over ten years ago.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 26

1 Q Do you remember what you paid for it?

2 A Around 20-.

3 Q 20,000?

4 A 20,000. Yeah.

5 Q What's the value today?

6 A It's not that much. Maybe 50-.

7 Q It's what?

8 A Maybe 50,000.

9 Q Is there a mortgage on that condo?

10 A No.

11 Q Is there a condo fee on that condo?

12 A Yes.

13 Q And who's that?

14 A Lynnhill Condominiums.

15 Q Lincoln?

16 A Lynnhill Condominiums.

17 Q Lynnhill?

18 A Yes.

19 Q And what are the condo fees on Good Hope Avenue?

20 A About 480.

21 Q 480?

22 A Uh-huh.

23 THE COURT: Per month?

24 THE WITNESS: Per month, yes.

25 BY MS. NIKLAS:

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 27

1 Q Were you current on May 31 when you filed this

2 case to the condo company on Good Hope Avenue?

3 A No.

4 Q How many months were you behind on that condo

5 company?

6 A It's -- over a year.

7 Q Did you schedule the condo company?

8 A No, I didn't.

9 Q Did you schedule your ownership interest in Good

10 Hope Avenue?

11 A No, I didn't.

12 Q Do you own any other property --

13 A No.

14 Q -- anywhere?

15 A No.

16 Q Have you sold or transferred ownership to any

17 property anywhere?

18 A No.

19 Q Do you owe anybody else any money other than the

20 ones we talked about today, such as credit cards, department

21 stores, friends, relatives, doctors?

22 A Yes.

23 Q About approximately how much?

24 A Maybe 50,000.

25 Q How many creditors do you owe money to?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 28

1 A Maybe six, seven.

2 Q And who are the largest, can you tell me who they

3 are and the amount you owe?

4 A Discover Card.

5 Q How much?

6 A I owe them about 9,000.

7 Q Go ahead.

8 A 9,000.

9 Q 9,000?

10 A Yes.

11 Q What's the next one?

12 A Pentagon -- Penn Fed, about 9,000.

13 Q Who's this?

14 A Penn Fed Credit Union.

15 Q Penn Fed?

16 A Yeah.

17 Q Who else?

18 A Navy Federal.

19 Q How much?

20 A It's about 10,000.

21 Q Okay. Who else?

22 A Citibank about 5000.

23 Bankruptcy...

24 I have a credit card with Penn Fed, about 3,000.

25 And just some smaller ones. Maybe Sears, 400.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 29

1 And that's all I can think of.

2 Q Did you tell the attorney that you spoke to that

3 you have all those other creditors?

4 A No.

5 Q Did the attorney ask?

6 A Well, he said if -- whatever credit -- whatever

7 other creditors I have, I probably just need to include them

8 also at the conversion.

9 Q Did you schedule any of these creditors, Discover,

10 Penn Fed, Navy FCU, Citibank or Sears?

11 A Did I schedule?

12 Q Schedule them?

13 A On the docket?

14 Q On the case you filed?

15 A No, I didn't.

16 Q Because why?

17 A Because I thought I was just supposed to schedule

18 the one that I was in -- you know, trying to stop

19 foreclosure for.

20 Q And who told you that?

21 A Well, that's what I just assumed.

22 I just had friends tell me, like it wasn't legal

23 advice. That's why I came in for legal advice.

24 Q When you saw my motion to dismiss, did you think

25 at any point that you should amend the schedules or talk to

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 30

1 an attorney?

2 A Well, I had already talked to an attorney after I

3 put in for the 13. It was shortly after. And then that's

4 when I converted, after talking with the attorney.

5 Q Your plan says you had to pay 5,400 a month.

6 That's to pay what?

7 A Well, that was a misunderstanding of that.

8 I thought -- because it says you had five years to

9 pay it. So I was putting in, divide in what was owed to

10 them to get that amount of 5,000 would equal up to the total

11 amount that was owed to ACC Mortgage.

12 Q So you want to pay ACC Mortgage in full?

13 A Well, it's -- I thought 13 would give you only

14 five years to pay them. So that's how I just calculated it.

15 Not saying it was right to do it that way.

16 Q And did you make any plan payments?

17 A No.

18 Q Are you involved in a lawsuit where people owe you

19 money? Are you making a claim against anyone?

20 A Yes.

21 Q Who?

22 A ACC Mortgage.

23 Q Anybody else?

24 A Yeah. To Dan Caplan.

25 Q Dan Caplan owes you money?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 31

1 THE COURT: "Caplan."

2 BY MS. NIKLAS:

3 Q Caplan owes you money?

4 A Yes.

5 Q How much?

6 A Whatever the Court decides. I have a discrepancy

7 on -- it was like a predatory loan so...

8 Q Are these counterclaims in Superior Court? Did

9 they sue you first and you counterclaimed -- or you sued

10 them?

11 A Well, ACC is --

12 Q Okay.

13 A -- they sued first.

14 Q Do you have an attorney?

15 THE COURT: Let her answer the question,

16 Ms. Niklas.

17 THE WITNESS: ACC sued first. So then I put in a

18 counterclaim for an item, for the Certificate of Service

19 that I had never received. That was -- not a counterclaim,

20 but that was a different suit. But I had -- was disputing

21 their claim in court.

22 BY MS. NIKLAS:

23 Q How much does ACC owe you, in your opinion?

24 A Well, in my suit, it's about $25,000.

25 THE COURT: If the Superior Court ruled against

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 32

1 you, correct?

2 THE WITNESS: No. Not that. Huh-uh. They

3 haven't ruled at all yet.

4 BY MS. NIKLAS:

5 Q Now, in the suit involving Daniel Caplan --

6 A Yes.

7 Q -- did you sue him or did he sue you first?

8 A I sued him first.

9 Q For what amount of money?

10 A For release of the lien for -- I didn't really put

11 an amount, just a release of the lien, and whatever the

12 Court decides.

13 Q What is the status of that case?

14 A It's in Court of Appeals.

15 Q Did you lose?

16 A When I went back -- when the first -- the case was

17 first heard, it was at the Court of Appeals. And they sent

18 it back; they remand it back. And then the Judge denied it

19 again so I sent it back to the Court of Appeals.

20 Q Do you have an attorney in Superior Court

21 representing you in either of these suits?

22 A No.

23 Q Why won't Daniel Caplan release the lien?

24 A I guess he assumed he's right, and I assume I'm

25 right.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 33

1 Q So you filed this case just to effect the rights

2 of ACC Mortgage because of the Superior Court case;

3 is that right?

4 A Could you repeat that.

5 Q You filed this case just to address your issues

6 with ACC Mortgage; is that right?

7 A You're speaking of the case with ACC Mortgage?

8 Q Well, this current Chapter 13 case.

9 A You said I filed it to?

10 Q Why did you file this case?

11 A To stop foreclosure.

12 Q From who?

13 A ACC Mortgage, to save my property.

14 Q And that's why you didn't bother filling in

15 anything else --

16 A It was mainly for that. Yes.

17 Q -- because it didn't matter to you?

18 MS. HARDY: No further questions. Thank you.

19 THE WITNESS: Thank you. Cross-examination.

20 - - -

21 CROSS-EXAMINATION

22 BY MR. OSTROFF:

23 Q Good morning, Ms. Hardy.

24 A Good morning.

25 Q Stepping back a second, what's the highest level

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 34

1 of education you've received?

2 A 12th.

3 Q 12th grade?

4 A Yes.

5 Q Did you take any post high school courses?

6 A Post?

7 Q Post high school coursework? Any professional,

8 any licensing, any -- you're a hair dresser. I assume you

9 took licensing courses?

10 A No.

11 Q Okay.

12 A I'm not a hairdresser. I just -- my mother -- and

13 the shop is the beauty salon. So I mean, I just run the

14 salon.

15 Q Who owns Capitol Hill Beauty, LLC?

16 A I do.

17 Q You're 100 percent owner?

18 A Well, 99 percent.

19 Q Who's the other 1 percent?

20 A It's Patricia White.

21 Q And that's your mother?

22 A Yes.

23 Q Okay. How do you file taxes? Do you file

24 separate corporate taxes or do you do a pass-through at

25 taxing?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 35

1 Do you report your business income on your taxes

2 or do you pay --

3 A Well, really the business was up under the

4 Capitol Hill, and it went under my mother's taxes.

5 Q Okay.

6 A So the Capitol Hill, LLC, is sort of adornment,

7 even though it was registered and is -- you know,

8 registered, but it's not -- haven't really filed taxes for

9 the LLC.

10 Q Okay. When you said you had $20,000 of income you

11 reported last year, where did that income come from?

12 A That was from the beauty salon, the Capitol Hill.

13 Q Okay. Did that come from your renters directly to

14 you --

15 A Right.

16 Q -- or was that deposited into the LLC?

17 A Directly to me.

18 Q And what did -- to your knowledge as a business

19 owner, how much money did your mother make from Capitol Hill

20 Beauty, LLC, in 2015?

21 A She made none.

22 Q Now, you've listed a number of -- today, you've

23 talked about a number of sources of income --

24 A Yes.

25 Q -- from different rents, rents coming to the

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 36

1 commercial property on Pennsylvania Avenue, to Q Street, to

2 Newton, to Good Hope.

3 But if I recall, you stated you've not made

4 payments on any mortgages or condo associations within the

5 last year; is that correct?

6 A That's correct.

7 Q How much money do you have in your bank account

8 right now?

9 A Maybe $500.

10 Q Can you list your ten biggest monthly expenses

11 that you actually pay?

12 A How much?

13 Q Yeah. What they are, and give me an idea of what

14 you're paying.

15 A I think it's Penn Fed, amount $600; Navy Federal,

16 about that amount, around 6-.

17 Q Household expenditures? Food? Utilities? Are

18 you current on your utilities?

19 A Yes.

20 Q Okay. How much would you say your utilities are

21 each month?

22 A About less than 200.

23 Q How do you get to work?

24 A I have a vehicle, but it's not in emission [sic]

25 right now. I mean, it's my brother's car. Or I can just

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 37

1 walk up the street.

2 Q The vehicle that you own is the Nissan Frontier?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Is that the only vehicle with your name and title?

5 A Yes.

6 Q Do you owe anybody any money for that vehicle?

7 A Yes. That's what Penn Fed is under.

8 Q Okay. So that's secured by Penn Fed?

9 A Yes.

10 Q And the monthly mortgage -- sorry. The monthly

11 vehicle payment, is that the $600?

12 A No. That one's the 300.

13 Q Okay.

14 A 3 -- maybe around 300.

15 THE COURT: What's the 600 per month for?

16 THE WITNESS: That's a personal loan.

17 BY MR. OSTROFF:

18 Q Are you current on your --

19 THE COURT: Just a minute.

20 Is that personal loan secured by a lien on your

21 real property?

22 THE WITNESS: No. No liens on that.

23 BY MR. OSTROFF:

24 Q Is it -- to follow up with the Judge's question,

25 is it possibly secured by the value of your vehicle as well?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 38

1 A Yes.

2 Q Are you current with your vehicle payment?

3 A Yes.

4 Q And I'm sorry. You said there was some issues

5 with it?

6 A Yeah.

7 Q What kind of issues?

8 A I need a supercharge.

9 Q What is your intention with your vehicle? Are you

10 going to keep it? Are you going to surrender it?

11 A Yes, I'm going to keep it.

12 Q How much do you believe -- how much work

13 do you believe needs to be put into it to make it run

14 properly?

15 A I don't know. I have to have someone look at it.

16 I haven't had a chance yet.

17 Q To clarify for the record, you said the Court

18 hasn't made a decision in the ACC matter; is that true?

19 A Yeah. I said the Court of Appeals hadn't made a

20 decision.

21 Q There are actually two court cases --

22 A Yeah, it's two.

23 Q -- with ACC, correct?

24 A Uh-huh.

25 Q One, ACC sued you?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 39

1 A Yes.

2 Q And there was a decision by the Superior Court in

3 favor of ACC Mortgage, correct?

4 A That's correct, but --

5 Q And you appealed that?

6 A That's the decision I appealed, but also the

7 Judge DeMayos [phonetic] had sent a letter stating that it's

8 no -- that the judgment is not a final judgment on -- with

9 Judge Nashgate [phonetic].

10 Q And the second ACC lawsuit, that's the one where

11 you're suing ACC?

12 A Yes.

13 Q And what's the basis of that claim?

14 A Certificate of Satisfaction.

15 Q And you're looking for a Certificate of

16 Satisfaction?

17 A They didn't give me one when I asked for it.

18 So it's been a year after the loan was made. They never --

19 I never received it, so...

20 Q You're talking about where you executed a new note

21 and a new deed of trust for ACC Mortgage, is that correct --

22 A Yeah.

23 Q -- as part of the settlement of a prior

24 foreclosure?

25 A Right.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 40

1 Q But you're currently litigating whether that new

2 note and that new deed of trust are valid, correct?

3 A That's correct.

4 Q So it would make sense if they withheld the

5 Certificate of Satisfaction while that's in dispute; is that

6 correct?

7 A Well, that's not what they're holding it for.

8 They're holding it until the Bankruptcy Court, I guess --

9 what decision was made under the Bankruptcy Court before

10 they go any further.

11 Q You mean the Court. The Court is not taking any

12 further action at this time?

13 A Right. Until they -- well, I have another court

14 date, but I guess they wanted to hear what the

15 Bankruptcy Court was going to do first.

16 MR. OSTROFF: The Court's indulgence just a

17 second, Your Honor.

18 May I approach, Your Honor?

19 THE COURT: Yes. You don't need to ask

20 permission, Mr. Ostroff.

21 BY MR. OSTROFF:

22 Q I've just handed you a document titled Date of

23 Trust Note; is that correct?

24 A Yes.

25 Q Do you recognize that document?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 41

1 A Yes, I do.

2 Q Can you describe what that document is?

3 A I don't have my glasses, but it's the deed of

4 trust note.

5 Q That would be the second deed of trust you've

6 executed with ACC Mortgage; is that correct?

7 A That's correct.

8 Q And on the last page of that, that bears your

9 signature in two places?

10 A That's correct.

11 Q One is a power of attorney for your mother?

12 A That's correct.

13 Q On the first page of that document, does it not

14 say that the mortgage is due in full on May 1st, 2015?

15 A I believe -- yeah.

16 Q And the mortgage is in the amount of $276,000?

17 A Yes.

18 MR. OSTROFF: Your Honor, I'd like to move that

19 into evidence.

20 THE COURT: No objection?

21 THE WITNESS: No objection.

22 THE COURT: That will be received into evidence as

23 ACC Exhibit No. 1.

24 BY MR. OSTROFF:

25 Q I've just handed you a second document titled Deed

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 42

1 of Trust; is that correct?

2 A Deed of Trust, yes.

3 Q You cannot be expected to review that, but does

4 that accurately represent the second Deed of Trust you to

5 executed with ACC Mortgage?

6 A Okay. Was the first one you gave me the Deed of

7 Trust for the same thing or --

8 Q Was the note, the Deed Of Trust Note.

9 A Note?

10 Q And that's titled Deed of Trust, correct?

11 A Okay.

12 Yes, this is.

13 Q And on page, I believe it's 6, is that your

14 signature?

15 A Yes.

16 MR. OSTROFF: Your Honor, I'd like to move that

17 into -- the exhibit.

18 THE COURT: Any objection?

19 THE WITNESS: No.

20 THE COURT: Exhibit No. 2 is received into

21 evidence.

22 MR. OSTROFF: Thank you.

23 BY MR. OSTROFF:

24 Q If your case is converted to Chapter 11, what is

25 your intention in terms of a plan, a Chapter 11 plan?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 43

1 What is your strategy? What would you like to see happen?

2 A Well, in the conversion, I would make a plan to

3 make sure everybody is paid.

4 Q By "everybody's paid," do you include all of your

5 secured debts?

6 A All my secured debts?

7 Q Yes.

8 A Yes.

9 Q How do you plan to fund that plan?

10 A From the income that's -- the potential income

11 that's to come in for the beauty salon, because, like I

12 said, I do have spaces for rent, and there's -- I have

13 people coming to look, and with the income that I already

14 have.

15 Q How many spaces are there to rent in the beauty

16 salon?

17 A There's three. Well, it's individual spaces and

18 it's a floor. And then it's like, one, two, three different

19 spaces, and then individual booths for rent.

20 Q Okay. When's the last time you were completely

21 rented?

22 A The first of the year.

23 Q Of 2016?

24 A Yes.

25 Q You had how many --

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 44

1 A I had some people in, but they had finished their

2 lease, and they went on to do different things.

3 Q How many total people did you have renting from

4 you?

5 A How many people, total people?

6 Q Uh-huh.

7 A One, two -- four.

8 Q And how much was your gross monthly income at that

9 time for the business, or how much was the business's?

10 A The rent upstairs was like 2,400 each side.

11 THE COURT: Each what?

12 THE WITNESS: Each side. It's two different

13 sides, floors. Well, it's one floor, but it's two sides.

14 And I just had one other person downstairs for the

15 booth round. Right now, I just have the one.

16 BY MR. OSTROFF:

17 Q I'm sorry. At that time at the first of the -- or

18 the end of last year, how many -- how much income did you

19 get from downstairs?

20 A For downstairs, it was maybe 500 a week.

21 Q Total?

22 A Yeah. But upstairs, it was -- go under the

23 monthly rate, which was probably about -- a little more than

24 4,000.

25 Q So based on what you said, and I just want to

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 45

1 clarify, I have you've received $4,800 per month upstairs

2 and $500 per month downstairs?

3 A Uh-huh. Right.

4 Q Now, you hadn't been paying ACC the monthly

5 mortgage payment. What expenditures did Capitol Hill

6 Beauty, LLC, have?

7 A Well, I had some renovation to, like, do the

8 floors and upgrade it inside pretty much.

9 Q How much did you spend on renovations?

10 A I don't have the exact figures right now, but...

11 Q Estimation.

12 A Maybe a total of 20,000.

13 Q Okay. By my calculations, that would be about

14 four months' rent, correct?

15 A Uh-huh. Yes.

16 THE COURT: Are those expenses already incurred or

17 to be incurred?

18 THE WITNESS: No. That's already occurred.

19 THE COURT: Okay.

20 BY MR. OSTROFF:

21 Q Did you have any other expenses for the business?

22 A No. No more than -- I had tax liens that I

23 cleared up about a year before that.

24 Q Which aren't -- on which property?

25 A On the beauty salon.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 46

1 Q And you stated, again, for the record, your total

2 adjusted income from the business was $20,000?

3 A Under my personal.

4 Q Okay. How much was it for the business?

5 A Well, that was under my mother at the time, so...

6 Q But you're the 99 percent owner, correct?

7 A No. Other. LLC. It's two different things.

8 It's Capitol Hill Beauty Salon, which is the sole of that,

9 and then it's LLC. It's just -- it's not really the beauty

10 salon, it's just an offset of the beauty salon, in case

11 I wanted to start something.

12 THE COURT: I don't understand at all.

13 Could you explain what the two different entities

14 are?

15 THE WITNESS: One is the beauty salon itself. And

16 I just did an LLC because I wanted to start converting

17 things over to the LLC. But I never got around to doing

18 that quite yet.

19 THE COURT: So the LLC is an empty shell?

20 THE WITNESS: Pretty much. It's not much going on

21 with it.

22 THE COURT: What little bit is going on with it?

23 THE WITNESS: Well, it's there for me to -- that's

24 what I'm saying. I was trying to change things over to the

25 LLC.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 47

1 THE COURT: To what extent does the LLC own any

2 assets?

3 THE WITNESS: None. It doesn't own any assets.

4 THE COURT: So if you run this beauty salon,

5 you're doing that as a sole proprietor?

6 THE WITNESS: Yes, that's how the beauty salon is

7 run.

8 THE COURT: Go ahead, Mr. Ostroff.

9 BY MR. OSTROFF:

10 Q Okay. I believe I confused it. I thought it was

11 one entity.

12 A No.

13 Q Who is the sole proprietor?

14 A Patricia White.

15 Q Okay. So your mother owns the salon?

16 A Right.

17 Q So she's a tenant in the commercial property?

18 A Okay. Yeah.

19 THE COURT: How does she pay you as a tenant?

20 THE WITNESS: Does she pay me as a tenant?

21 THE COURT: Yes.

22 THE WITNESS: Well, I sort of run the whole place,

23 the salon. So I get paid, yes.

24 THE COURT: What do you get paid?

25 THE WITNESS: As a self-employed.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 48

1 THE COURT: Who pays you that?

2 THE WITNESS: I get paid under the rents that I

3 collect.

4 THE COURT: How much rent do you receive from the

5 salon?

6 THE WITNESS: For right now, right this minute,

7 it's the $250 a week, while I have some potential people

8 coming in by the end of the month.

9 THE COURT: Let me ask it a little bit

10 differently: How much does your mother pay you -- if she's

11 the sole proprietor of the salon, how much does she pay you

12 each month?

13 THE WITNESS: Well, I get paid out of the rent.

14 So I mean, I sort of pay myself because I run the salon

15 right now.

16 THE COURT: You run the salon. And what do you

17 collect as a result of --

18 THE WITNESS: As rent --

19 THE COURT: -- renting to someone?

20 THE WITNESS: Well, right now, it's just 250, but

21 I get paid -- how much do I get paid is what you want to

22 know --

23 THE COURT: Yes.

24 THE WITNESS: -- when I get paid? It's 500 a

25 week.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 49

1 THE COURT: From who?

2 THE WITNESS: From the rent. I get paid out of

3 the rent.

4 THE COURT: And now it's only 250 a month --

5 THE WITNESS: Right.

6 THE COURT: -- because you only have one tenant?

7 THE WITNESS: Right. So right now I'm not really

8 doing anything right now.

9 THE COURT: All right.

10 BY MR. OSTROFF:

11 Q Do you have a lease agreement with your mother or

12 the salon?

13 A Yes.

14 Q How much does the lease agreement require her to

15 pay you each month?

16 A I have to look back and see. As -- it was done

17 some time ago.

18 Q Is she --

19 A I don't know if a figure is stipulated in the

20 lease agreement.

21 Q Would you say, as a tenant, the beauty salon owes

22 back rent, is current on the rent, or is ahead on the rent?

23 A You mean does it owe ACC or who are you saying

24 owe?

25 Q Well, the landlord would be between the owner of

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 50

1 the commercial property and the tenant, which is the salon?

2 A Well, right now I would say back rent because it's

3 not actively fluid.

4 Q How much back rent?

5 A I can't say at this time.

6 Q Can you estimate?

7 A I would say some months.

8 THE COURT: How many?

9 THE WITNESS: Just some months. I can't say

10 exactly. Four months.

11 THE COURT: And what's the monthly rent?

12 THE WITNESS: Okay. Well, the place is vacant

13 right now, but the monthly rent is different at different

14 locations. Like upstairs it's a little bit more than

15 downstairs.

16 MR. OSTROFF: Your Honor --

17 THE COURT: Does the sole proprietorship enter

18 into leases with these people who rent spaces?

19 THE WITNESS: No. They enter into an agreement

20 with me.

21 THE COURT: And if your mother runs a sole

22 proprietorship there, what does she garner as income by

23 reason of running a sole proprietorship?

24 THE WITNESS: Well, it's the rents from -- the

25 total rents from the shop when it's rented. But right now

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 51

1 it's not fluid. But I'm looking to get it back fluid.

2 Q Does she collect rents from the people who rent

3 spaces?

4 A I do. I collect it.

5 THE COURT: So what income does your mother earn

6 by reason of this sole proprietorship that is the Capitol

7 Hill Beauty Salon?

8 THE WITNESS: Well, it depends, because it's not

9 fluid right now.

10 But everything's been taken care of as far as once

11 everything is paid out. So it's nothing really -- that went

12 to her pro se [sic], just make sure everything is taken care

13 of, all the bills are taken care of.

14 THE COURT: Who pays for the electricity at the

15 beauty salon?

16 THE WITNESS: I do.

17 THE COURT: What kind of heat does it have?

18 THE WITNESS: Gas.

19 THE COURT: Who pays the gas bill for the beauty

20 salon?

21 THE WITNESS: I do.

22 THE COURT: What expenses of the beauty salon does

23 your mother pay?

24 THE WITNESS: None.

25 THE COURT: And she doesn't get any income from

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 52

1 the beauty salon, because the income are the rents, correct?

2 THE WITNESS: Correct.

3 THE COURT: So she gets no income from the beauty

4 salon and pays no expenses for the beauty salon?

5 THE WITNESS: Right. I sort of run everything.

6 THE COURT: So why do you say she's a sole

7 proprietor? She's not paid --

8 THE WITNESS: No. The business under her name is

9 under sole proprietor.

10 THE COURT: And what business is that?

11 THE WITNESS: It's the Capitol Hill Beauty Salon,

12 but...

13 THE COURT: How can it be a business if it's not

14 operating in the sense of getting income or spending money

15 on expenses?

16 THE WITNESS: Well, that's just for the beauty

17 salon, because there's other spaces, like upstairs, that

18 could be rented for different other things besides the

19 beauty salon.

20 THE COURT: She's not renting any of the spaces,

21 whether it's for the beauty salon or for the upstairs.

22 THE WITNESS: Uh-huh.

23 THE COURT: So how can it be an active sole

24 proprietorship if she's not at any time getting any income

25 from running the sole proprietorship or making any

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 53

1 expenditures in order to operate this sole proprietorship?

2 THE WITNESS: Well, she pretty much turned it over

3 to me. It was turned over to me to run things.

4 THE COURT: Is there anything in paper that

5 designates her as a sole proprietor?

6 THE WITNESS: Just the business license.

7 THE COURT: So there's a business license in the

8 name of your mother for running Capitol Hill Beauty Salon?

9 THE WITNESS: Yes.

10 THE COURT: Mr. Ostroff.

11 BY MR. OSTROFF:

12 Q Now, you did not list any accounts receivables on

13 your schedules; is that correct?

14 A It's lot of things that wasn't listed because of

15 my lack of understanding, until I came into the

16 Bankruptcy Court to see the attorneys. It's a lot of things

17 that have been clarified.

18 But it's also a lot of things that wasn't done,

19 so...

20 Q Do you intend to hire a permanent counsel for your

21 Chapter 11 case if it's converted?

22 A Well, I continue to come here to the

23 Bankruptcy Court to get legal advice.

24 THE COURT: Are you referring to the bankruptcy

25 assistance center that's once approximately every two

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 54

1 Fridays?

2 THE WITNESS: Yes.

3 BY MR. OSTROFF:

4 Q But you don't have any intention to hire full-time

5 counsel, permanent counsel for your Chapter 11?

6 A No. I thought that would be -- suffice to see the

7 attorneys downstairs.

8 Q Do you understand the U.S. Trustee's fee structure

9 in the Chapter 11 case?

10 A The fee structure? No, I haven't went over that

11 with them yet.

12 Q Do you intend to employ an accountant?

13 A An accountant?

14 Q An accountant?

15 A No, I hadn't planned to. Not unless it's needed.

16 If we discuss it downstairs and he tell me, well,

17 this is what you need to do, that's how I'm going to -- just

18 going to go with the advice of the bankruptcy attorney

19 downstairs.

20 Q You do understand the clinic downstairs is a help

21 clinic, not an attorney, correct?

22 A Well, he's been helpful. So I mean...

23 Q You've seen the same attorney each week?

24 A Yes.

25 Q What's his name?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 55

1 A Jeff.

2 Q Jeff?

3 A I forget his last name.

4 Q Is there any reason that you can give this Court

5 why your case should not be converted to Chapter 7?

6 A Well, for those reasons. It's three times the

7 equity in it, and I believe that a plan would be -- suffice

8 to cover whatever debts that was needed.

9 Q But your plan is going to be funded by projections

10 that you've made in your head, correct?

11 A No. Projections that it's going to come into

12 fruition.

13 Q Over the last five years, how much profit have you

14 personally made on all of your business ventures? What's

15 the highest level of income you've reported over the last

16 five years, you personally?

17 A Me personally?

18 Q Uh-huh.

19 A I don't know. I have to go back and see.

20 I couldn't -- I don't want to give an incorrect figure.

21 MR. OSTROFF: Your Honor, that's all I have at

22 this moment.

23 THE COURT: Ms. Niklas.

24 MS. NIKLAS: I have no further questions.

25 Thank you.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 56

1 THE COURT: Anything you want to add?

2 THE WITNESS: No.

3 THE COURT: You may step down. Thank you.

4 THE WITNESS: Thank you.

5 Any other evidence other than the court record and

6 the debtor's filings?

7 MR. OSTROFF: No, I don't have anything else,

8 Your Honor.

9 THE COURT: Exhibit No. 2 was received into

10 evidence as well, correct?

11 (No verbal response.)

12 THE COURT: Yes. All right.

13 And the debtor has no further evidence?

14 MS. HARDY: Excuse me?

15 THE COURT: Do you have any further evidence?

16 MS. HARDY: No. No more than what I already

17 submitted to the Court.

18 THE COURT: By way of your testimony?

19 MS. HARDY: No.

20 THE COURT: Thank you.

21 Ms. Niklas.

22 MS. NIKLAS: Your Honor, I strongly believe that

23 with, admittedly, no planned payments, no turned over tax

24 returns, admittedly grossly inadequate, incomplete, and

25 misleading schedules, involving not listing at least 11 or

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 57

1 12 creditors, three other properties, I&J completely false

2 and blank, the causes of action against Daniel -- and I keep

3 mispronouncing it -- and not even listing that lawsuit, that

4 dismissal with prejudice is totally justified and

5 appropriate.

6 I also feel that this same issue of the missing

7 and false schedules and incomplete assets, et cetera,

8 prevents a fair conversion to a Chapter 11 or a Chapter 7,

9 because you'd have to have your affairs in order before you

10 can be in a chapter or convert to another chapter. But

11 I did not take a position regarding the creditor's motion to

12 Convert to 7.

13 Clearly, this was -- this case was filed to attack

14 a creditor, as Chapter 13 was used as a sword, not as a

15 shield. There's no interest or attempt to organize or

16 provide the Court with any information that's accurate. So

17 I'm requesting that the case be dismissed with prejudice.

18 And if it is converted to Chapter 7, that the

19 debtor be ordered to immediately file complete and accurate

20 schedules; and, otherwise, it would jeopardize her discharge

21 in Chapter 7. Thank you.

22 MR. OSTROFF: Your Honor, as a secured creditor on

23 a property that appears to be oversecured, my client's

24 interest is in the dismissal without -- dismissal with

25 prejudice; however, we also take the position that a

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 58

1 Chapter 7 conversion may be in the best interest of the

2 estate in this matter, as it is clear the debtor intends to

3 continue to pursue claims which she has not been able to

4 demonstrate have merit against two secured creditors.

5 She stated in her testimony today she has $50,000

6 in unsecured debt, substantial equity in properties for

7 which she's not paying on and which could be subject to

8 other actions of foreclosure, which could prejudice all of

9 the creditors as a whole. If properties are foreclosed upon

10 for pennies on the dollar, you have -- you've converted

11 equity into losses for everybody.

12 I believe my client will sustain -- will be made

13 whole through a foreclosure; however, the possibility,

14 depending on what goes on in continued litigation or outside

15 the nonbankruptcy world, puts a risk at both our -- what

16 we believe is a secured claim that the debtor's contesting,

17 and, as well, all of the unsecured creditors.

18 Nothing in the debtor's testimony today supports

19 her request for a conversion. She's provided no feasible

20 possibility of reorganization. She's provided no statement

21 of an intention to get her affairs in order through the

22 employment of professionals, whether legal or accounting.

23 I'll take the liberty to say that her business enterprise,

24 as described, amounts to a shell game, where it's not clear

25 who owns what and who's supposed to get paid.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 59

1 The Chapter 11, if the debtor is a debtor in

2 possession, will have to work on re-organizing, re-engaging

3 both creditors, as well as tenants, to see if a plan can be

4 confirmed, to see if leases can be assumed or rejected.

5 The issue of her doing a joint venture, some kind

6 of sole proprietorship with her mother, which may or may not

7 be making money depending on which statement she made, is a

8 large concern.

9 I believe you would need an independent trustee in

10 a Chapter 11. I believe the expenses to the Court, she has

11 not demonstrated that she can at this time make the U.S.

12 Trustee's quarterly filing fees.

13 She has not demonstrated by her original schedules

14 or her failure to amend her schedules that she can properly

15 execute monthly operating reports and continue all of the

16 reporting requirements that a Chapter 11 would require.

17 She has failed to even demonstrate that she

18 understands what the Chapter 11 entails. Her biggest

19 statement being that because this is business related, I can

20 convert to a Chapter 11.

21 I'm seriously concerned with the deleted

22 creditors; with the fact that no other creditors were given

23 notice on behalf -- by the debtor or -- because of the

24 debtor through this Court, no other creditors have had the

25 opportunity to object to conversion, because they were not

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 60

1 served with notices.

2 You have secured -- another secured -- sounds like

3 a previous owner who took a security interest in a property

4 sale, as well as condo associations, which have not been

5 paid in years. All of those parties should be here before a

6 conversion to check on as even considered. The debtor's

7 made no effort to give them notice.

8 Again, we believe that based on the schedules, the

9 testimony, the omissions and the lack of action by the

10 debtor, her stated reason for filing the bankruptcy, this

11 Court can make the determination that this is a bad-faith

12 Chapter 13 filing; that the case should be dismissed with

13 prejudice or converted to Chapter 7 with the appointment of

14 a Chapter 7 trustee to investigate and liquidate the assets

15 for the benefit of creditors. Thank you, Your Honor.

16 THE COURT: I'll hear from the debtor.

17 MS. HARDY: Yes, Your Honor.

18 I made some mistakes in the Chapter 13. I didn't

19 submit the -- meet the requirements of the 13. But

20 I thought when you convert to the 11, that everything is

21 taken care of under that, whatever wasn't done.

22 Like I said, I was going to the bankruptcy's

23 attorneys downstairs, which was giving me legal advice, and

24 said they would be with me solely throughout the process.

25 And basically that's all I have to say.

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 61

1 I have enough equity in the property to -- for,

2 you know, to make a plan, and that -- no other bills, my

3 personal bills have been delinquent, just this one with the

4 ACC, and the other one with Dan Caplan, which is in court.

5 So I just ask to accept the conversion.

6 THE COURT: All right. Thank you.

7 MS. HARDY: Thank you.

8 THE COURT: Ms. Niklas, the statute says, whatever

9 is in the best interest of the creditors, I think. Let me

10 make sure.

11 MS. HARDY: Oh.

12 THE COURT: Either dismiss or convert.

13 My Section 1307(c) says that after a hearing, the

14 Court can either convert the case to Chapter 7 or dismiss

15 the case, whichever is in the best interest of creditors and

16 the estate.

17 I assume that cause has been shown for either

18 dismissal or conversion.

19 Why isn't conversion more in the interest of the

20 creditors and the estate when the record amply demonstrates

21 that they're unpaid, unsecured creditors?

22 She can't do it in Chapter 13. She -- in the

23 Chapter 7, the trustee can liquidate these assets and pay

24 off the unsecured creditors and -- if I dismiss it, as

25 Mr. Ostroff indicates, the properties can go to foreclosure

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 62

1 and the unsecured creditors wouldn't get paid.

2 MS. NIKLAS: Well, Your Honor, I filed my motion

3 on June 24 just based on the court record, which is zero

4 income and zero et cetera on 10130 and 109 ineligibility.

5 The debtor did not come to the meeting of

6 creditors this Monday. So I had no information -- and I did

7 not take a position on the conversion. I simply asked,

8 based on the court record back in June when I saw this

9 dismissal with prejudice, that's the only grounds I had at

10 the time. Had she come to the meeting of creditors on

11 July 11 and I had examined her similar to today, I would

12 have seen that there are unsecured creditors and there are a

13 lot of other assets.

14 So at this point, I think that it would be in the

15 best interest of creditors to have a 7 trustee liquidate at

16 least the two condos in Maryland. And based on the values

17 of these businesses that she's testified to, to liquidate or

18 sell at least one or two of these and pay the 50,000 in

19 unsecured creditors.

20 But this information I just received this morning

21 from her testimony, I'm at a loss, because there was no

22 accurate schedules, and I was unaware of the extent of the

23 assets in this case and the amount of unsecured creditors.

24 So I don't take a position on a conversion of

25 Chapter 7, I leave that up to the Court. It seems that

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 63

1 based on these additional unscheduled assets and debts, that

2 it would be in the best interest of creditors to have a

3 conversion of Chapter 7.

4 But I'm concerned to send the chapter -- a case to

5 another chapter that is so grossly and inaccurately filed.

6 Usually, you're going to have one or two assets not

7 scheduled. There's more unfiled and unscheduled than

8 scheduled. This is a totally different picture this morning

9 from what the schedules show.

10 So, again, my motion is simply based on what was

11 available to me on June 24th. I was unaware of the

12 additional issues today.

13 So I don't take a position on Chapter 7, but it

14 does seem, from her testimony, that the creditors would be

15 better off if she were in Chapter 7.

16 THE COURT: Nothing further, Mr. Ostroff?

17 MR. OSTROFF: Nothing further, Your Honor.

18 THE COURT: This has been a hearing on the

19 debtor's motion to convert her case from Chapter 13 to

20 Chapter 11. And in the trustee's motion to dismiss the case

21 with prejudice based on ineligibility and bad faith, bad

22 faith has been amply demonstrated by reason of the debtor's

23 failure accurately to file schedules.

24 She filed the case to stop a foreclosure sale by

25 Mr. Ostroff's client, ACC, being All Credit Considered,

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 64

1 Mortgage Incorporated.

2 She didn't list any of her other creditors. She's

3 got an ample number of other creditors, including, by your

4 estimate, 50- to $60,000 in unsecured claims.

5 She did not accurately list her expenses and her

6 income. She didn't list real properties that she owns and

7 the mortgages or condominium fees owed with respect to such

8 properties.

9 Her defense is she thought that she only had to

10 deal with the creditor that was a generating source of

11 her -- the prompting source for her filing the bankruptcy

12 case, meaning the entity whose foreclosure sale prompted her

13 to file the bankruptcy case. But the schedules clearly

14 indicated that she was supposed to list all creditors,

15 supposed to list all properties, supposed to list all

16 expenses and income.

17 In her testimony, she suggested that she could

18 earn enough income from a business known as Capitol Hill

19 Beauty Salon, but there's no suggestion she's ever made

20 enough income from that enterprise in order to carry out a

21 plan.

22 In her closing argument, she finally says she has

23 enough equity in her properties to make a plan, but she

24 doesn't suggest how she's going to be able, confidently, to

25 carry out a Chapter 11 case, including having enough income

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 65

1 each month to pay each court -- excuse me, each quarter to

2 pay the U.S. Trustee quarterly fee.

3 She hasn't given creditors the opportunity to

4 oppose a conversion to Chapter 11, because she hasn't listed

5 all of her creditors.

6 The Court's Local Rules clearly require and the

7 Bankruptcy Code clearly requires that -- the code requires

8 you to list all creditors, and the Court attempted to give

9 all creditors notice of the hearing on the motion to

10 convert -- the fact that the code doesn't require notice to

11 all creditors of a motion to convert but certainly the

12 Court's intention was to give all creditors notice of the

13 opportunity to oppose the motion to convert.

14 The Chapter 13 Trustee's motion, find an issue as

15 to feasibility, mainly the debtor's schedules having

16 indicated she doesn't have the ability to pay any of the

17 expenses that a Chapter 11 would entail. And creditors

18 should have been allowed to participate in addressing

19 whether the case should be converted to 7 -- to a Chapter 11

20 or, instead, the motion should be denied and the case

21 converted to Chapter 7.

22 The secure creditor, ACC Mortgage, Inc., to whom

23 I've alluded previously, supports a dismissal with prejudice

24 but also has voiced a recommendation that the case be

25 converted to Chapter 7 in light of there being unsecured

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 66

1 creditors that have not been paid.

2 Any debtor's financial affairs are complicated by

3 uncertainty as to exactly how her business is structured.

4 She said she's the 99 percent owner of an LLC with her

5 mother, I think, having a 1 percent interest.

6 And at one point, she was suggesting that's the

7 company that operates the beauty salon. But in further

8 testimony, she indicated that the beauty salon is operated

9 as a sole proprietorship of her mother. She says that

10 her -- it's on lease between herself and her mother

11 regarding renting the property as a sole proprietorship.

12 But all of the income from the sole proprietorship goes

13 to -- not from the sole proprietorship but from the beauty

14 salon, goes directly to the debtor by way of renting spaces

15 to hairstylists.

16 And the sole proprietorship doesn't have any

17 expenses, other than possibly this possible lease between

18 the debtor and the sole proprietorship.

19 It's all very confusing. The debtor should have

20 filed accurate schedules when she filed the case or within a

21 reasonable time after filing the case.

22 She'd made no planned payments in the Chapter 13

23 case.

24 There's no suggestion she really has an ability to

25 conduct a Chapter 11 case. In the circumstances, it's

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 67

1 appropriate to convert the case to Chapter 7.

2 A dismissal with prejudice would stay the debtor

3 from filing a bankruptcy case for 180 days and would allow

4 her foreclosures to proceed.

5 I think it's predictable that at least as to some

6 of the entities who have liens against the debtor's property

7 as to which the debtor is in arrears, that the debtor would

8 succeed in dragging out any effort to foreclose. She would

9 file lawsuits or whatever it would take to delay it, and we

10 would see the debtor come back, filing a bankruptcy case

11 after 180 days and trying to address some of those secured

12 creditors' efforts to proceed with enforcement of their

13 liens.

14 In the circumstances, I think, it's best to

15 convert the case to Chapter 7 and let a Chapter 7 Trustee

16 address what's the best way to maximize the value of the

17 estate, which would benefit the debtor by assuring that

18 whatever equity there is in properties is maximized by way

19 of an only [phonetic] sale instead of a foreclosure sale.

20 So the best interest of creditors and the estate,

21 which includes the debtor's residual interest in the estate

22 after creditors are paid, will weigh heavily in favor of

23 converting the space to Chapter 7.

24 I will warn the debtor that if she fails to amend

25 her schedules and her statement of financial affairs and the

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 68

1 other papers that were required to be filed from 14 days

2 after the commencement of the case, if she fails to amend

3 those to accurately list creditors, to accurately list her

4 assets and her debts, her income and her expenses, she faces

5 the prospect that she will be denied a discharge in the

6 Chapter 7 case.

7 This bankruptcy system cannot operate in an

8 appropriate way when a debtor files papers that are

9 knowingly false.

10 It's no excuse for the debtor to say that she

11 thought she only had to deal with the one creditor who's

12 impelling her to file the bankruptcy case. The schedules

13 and the Statement of Financial Affairs clearly indicate that

14 the debtor's to accurately list information, and she's not

15 done that, and the Court will convert the case to Chapter 7.

16 Thank you, Counsel.

17 MR. OSTROFF: Your Honor, if I may address the

18 Court one last chance.

19 We did have a request for attorneys' fees, which I

20 reserved on, because I don't think it's appropriate to

21 address pending your decision; however, I suggest that I

22 submit an application or a claim.

23 THE COURT: Why don't you just claim it as part of

24 your secured claim? Doesn't your Deed of Trust allow you to

25 do that?

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 69

1 MR. OSTROFF: There is that argument, yes,

2 Your Honor, I just wanted to preserve our collectability.

3 THE COURT: It's not denied.

4 MR. OSTROFF: Okay.

5 THE COURT: But I'm not going to act on it unless

6 you file a motion to specify why you think that's the

7 appropriate course, and spelling out what the fees are.

8 MR. OSTROFF: Thank you, Your Honor.

9 THE COURT: We're here for a hearing, it's the

10 trustee's motion to dismiss. I guess your response to the

11 motion to convert -- did you ask for the fees in that or in

12 your own --

13 MR. OSTROFF: I believe they were asked in both,

14 Your Honor, just to clarify.

15 THE COURT: Let me make a note.

16 MR. OSTROFF: It's not in the heading, Your Honor,

17 but it is in one of the paragraphs of the opposition. It

18 was in the heading of our motion.

19 THE COURT: All right. Thank you, Counsel.

20 (Proceedings concluded at 11:40 a.m.)

21

22

23

24

25

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com
 70

C E R T I F I C A T E
I, William P. Zaremba, RMR, CRR, certify that
the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of
proceedings in the above-titled matter.

Date: December 2, 2016______ /S/__William P. Zaremba______
William P. Zaremba, RMR, CRR

WilliamPZaremba@gmail.com