DENY; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2016.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-01478-CV
IN RE ACE PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05179
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Evans
Before the Court is relator’s December 21, 2016 amended petition for writ of mandamus.
The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we
deny relator’s amended petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny as moot relator’s
December 27, 2016 motion to stay trial setting.
/David Evans/
DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
161478F.P05
in Re: Ace Parking Management, Inc.
Combined Opinion