Sherwin Basil Hare v. State

MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 3, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00461-CR SHERWIN BASIL HARE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-82553-2012 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Brown Sherwin Basil Hare appeals his conviction, following adjudication of his guilt, for assault involving family violence. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement in the county jail for 275 days. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Although not arguable issues, we note several errors in the judgment adjudicating guilt. Appellant was indicted for the third-degree felony offense of assault involving family violence by impeding the breath. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(a), (b)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2016). However, appellant pleaded guilty to the lesser included Class A misdemeanor offense of assault involving family violence. Id. § 22.01(a), (b). The trial court placed appellant on deferred community supervision for one year for the Class A misdemeanor offense, and later adjudicated appellant guilty of the Class A misdemeanor offense. The judgment adjudicating guilt incorrectly states the offense for which appellant was convicted as “Assault Fam/House Mem Impede Breath/Circulat,” the degree of the offense as “3rd Degree Felony,” and the statute for the offense as “Section 22.01(b)(2)(B) Penal Code.” Accordingly, on our own motion, we modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to show the offense for which appellant was convicted is “Assault/Family Violence,” the degree of the offense is “Class A Misdemeanor,” and the statute for offense is “Penal Code 22.01.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd). Further, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt incorrectly reflects there was a plea bargain agreement. The record shows appellant entered an open plea of true to the allegations recited in the motion to adjudicate. Accordingly, we modify the section of the judgment entitled “terms of plea bargain” to state “open.” See id. –2– As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt. We order the trial court to enter an amended judgment reflecting these modifications. /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 160461F.U05 –3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT SHERWIN BASIL HARE, Appellant On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-16-00461-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 401-82553-2012. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Justices THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Lang and Whitehill participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment adjudicating guilt of the trial court is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled “Statute for Offense” is modified to show “Penal Code 22.01.” The section entitled “Offense for which Defendant Convicted” is modified to show “Assault/Family Violence.” The section entitled “Degree” is modified to show “Class A Misdemeanor.” The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.” As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt. We ORDER the trial court to enter an amended judgment reflecting these modifications. Judgment entered this 3rd day of January, 2017. –4–