Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret L. Clancy, J.), entered August 4, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime, which consisted of repeated sexual abuse of a nine-year-old child over an extended period. In particular, we do not find defendant’s age to be a significant mitigating factor, given that he committed the underlying crime at the age of 41 and is now only three years older.
The court properly designated defendant a sexually violent offender because he was convicted of an enumerated offense, and the court lacked discretion to do otherwise (see People v Bullock, 125 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 915 [2015]).We have considered and rejected defendant’s constitutional arguments.