IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00421-CV
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN,
Appellant
v.
ABEL REYNA AND STERLING HARMON,
Appellees
From the 54th District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012-709-C2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 13, 2016, appellant, Lowell Quincy Green, filed in this Court an
original petition under Title 42, Section 1983 of the United States Code against McLennan
County District Attorney Abelino Reyna and McLennan County Appellate Division
Chief Sterling Harmon. On December 20, 2016, we notified Green of our concern that we
lack jurisdiction over this appeal because it appears that there is no final judgment or
appealable order in this case.
Generally, only final decisions of a trial court are appealable. Gregory v. Foster, 35
S.W.3d 255, 257 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, no pet.) (citing N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v.
Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966)). Indeed, the Texas Supreme Court has held that
an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment and certain interlocutory orders
identified by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see
also Macon v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice-Inst. Div., No. 10-10-00150-CV, 2012 Tex. App.
LEXIS 4207, at **2-3 (Tex. App.—Waco May 23, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“Unless an
interlocutory appeal is expressly authorized by statute, we only have jurisdiction over an
appeal taken from a final judgment.”). Because there is no final judgment or appealable,
interlocutory order in this case, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.1 See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195; see also Macon, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS
4207, at **2-3.
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to Tex. R. App.
P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007); see TEX. R. APP. P. 5;
10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b), 51,208, 51.941(a)
(West 2013). Under these circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write
1 It appears the “final judgment” about which Green complains is the judgment in the criminal case
of his conviction and punishment sentence. It does not appear that there is or was a civil proceeding that
proceeded to a final judgment. It further appears Green erroneously believes this appeal is that proceeding.
It is not.
Green v. Reyna, et al. Page 2
off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the
accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed.
AL SCOGGINS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed January 11, 2017
[CV06]
Green v. Reyna, et al. Page 3