Joseph L. Farah III v. Fat Cat Boatworks, L.L.C.

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2017-01-12
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                               NUMBER 13-16-00656-CV

                               COURT OF APPEALS

                    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                       CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

JOSEPH L. FARAH III,                                                                Appellant,

                                                v.

FAT CAT BOATWORKS, L.L.C.,                          Appellee.
____________________________________________________________

          On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
                   of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________

                            MEMORANDUM OPINION
            Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras1, and Longoria
                     Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

       Appellant, Joseph L. Farah III, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the

County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2015-CCV-61603-

3.   Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and requests that this Court



       1 Justice Dori Contreras, formerly Dori Contreras Garza. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 45.101 et
seq. (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.).
withdraw appellant’s notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. More than ten days has

passed since the filing of the motion and no response has been filed by appellee.

      The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a).   Appellant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.     Costs will be taxed against appellant.     See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.



                                                PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the
12th day of January, 2017.




                                            2