FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 24 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50478
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00050-SVW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LORENZO GONZALEZ, a.k.a. Grumpy,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 18, 2017**
Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Lorenzo Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 262-month sentence imposed upon resentencing after remand following his
jury-trial conviction for one count of racketeering influenced and corrupt
organizations conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and two counts of
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
violent crime in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959(a)(2). We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gonzalez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district
court declined to impose the below-guidelines sentence recommended by the
probation officer. The record reflects that the district court adequately explained
its reasons for not accepting the probation officer’s recommendation. See United
States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). The district court did
not abuse its discretion in imposing Gonzalez’s sentence. See Gall v. United
States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively
reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of
the circumstances, including the seriousness of Gonzalez’s offenses and the need
for deterrence. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.
AFFIRMED.
2 15-50478