Cao Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

                 CAO GROUP, INC.,
                     Appellant

                           v.

           BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
                      Appellee
               ______________________

                      2016-1664
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,271.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   H. DICKSON BURTON, TraskBritt, PC, Salt Lake City,
UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. JEFFREY
GUNN, STEPHEN E. PULLEY.

   JOSHUA LEE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig LLP, New
York, NY, argued for appellee.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
   PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit
Judges).
         AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                    ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 January 27, 2017            /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
      Date                   Peter R. Marksteiner
                             Clerk of Court