In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
(Filed: January 17, 2017)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED
ROBERT BATTISTONE, *
* No. 09-878V
*
Petitioner, * Chief Special Master Dorsey
*
v. * Influenza (“flu”) Vaccine; Post-
* Vaccination Encephalitis; Stipulation.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH *
AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Anne Toale, Maglio, Christopher and Toale, Sarasota, Florida, for petitioner.
Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION 1
On December 18, 2009, Robert Battistone (“petitioner”) filed a petition in the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program 2 alleging that he suffered “numerous medical issues,”
and post-vaccination encephalitis as the result of the varicella vaccination administered on
December 18, 2006. Pet. at preamble.
1
Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note
(2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided
by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this decision
to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
On January 17, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation in which they stated that a decision
should be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the varicella vaccination
either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged injuries or any other injury.
Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A.
The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in
awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
a. A lump sum of $519,980.79, which represents compensation for first year life care
expenses ($44,940.18), and combined lost earnings, pain and suffering, and past
expenses ($475,040.61) in the form of a check payable to petitioner;
b. A lump sum of $8,174.50, which represents reimbursement of an invoice for services
rendered on behalf of petitioner, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner
and:
North Cypress Medical Center
Billing Department
21214 Northwest Freeway
Cypress, TX 77429
ATTN: Lynn
Patient ID: V00001394802
Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to North Cypress Medical Center; and
c. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of
the stipulation, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be
purchased.
These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Stipulation dated January 17, 2017 (ECF No. 153) at ¶ 8.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of
Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2