Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2016-2056 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. ______________________ Decided: February 15, 2017 ______________________ KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN. RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant- appellant. ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges. 2 AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE PER CURIAM. On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED