Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT September 182006 The Honorable Frank J. Carte, Jr. Opinion No. GA-0463 Chair, Committee on Defense Affairs and State-Federal Relations Re: Whether the fuearms standards of the Texas House of Representatives Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’ meet Post Office Box 2910 the criteria of Texas law (RQ-0463-GA) Austin, Texas 78768-2910 Dear Representative Carte: The federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004 (the “Act”)* permits an individual who is a qualified retired law enforcement officer to carry concealed fuearms in any state if the individual satisfies the Act’s requirements. One of those requirements is that the individual “has met the State’s standards for training and qualification for active law enforcement officers to carry firearms.” 18 U.S.C.A. § 926C(c)(5) (West Supp. 2006). You ask whether the firearm standards of the federal Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (the “Bureau”) meet the training and qualification standards of the State of Texas3 The state’s firearm training and qualifying standards for active law enforcement officers are established by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education (the “Commission”). Chapter 1701 of the Occupations Code requires the Commission to establish and maintain training programs for peace officers or reserve law enforcement officers. See TEx. OCC. CODEANN. § 1701.25l(a)~(Vemon2004); see also id. 5 1701.001(4) (Vernon Supp. 2005) (defining “peace officer” as “a person elected, employed, or appointed as a peace officer under” article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or other law); TEx. CODE Cm. PROC. ANN. art. 2.12 (Vernon Supp. 2005) (listing peace officers). The initial training, including weapons proficiency training, must be conducted by Commission staff or by other entities the Commission considers appropriate. See TEX. Oct. CODE ANN. 5s 1701.251(a), ,256 (Vernon 2004); see also id. $§ 1701.308 (stating ‘The Bureau ofcustoms and Border Protection, formerly the Customs Service, see H. Dot. No. 108-32 (2003), is also referred to as the United States Customs and Border Protection. ‘See Law Enforcement Ofiicers Safety Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-277, 118 Stat. 865 ‘See Letter and attachments from Honorable Frank J. Cork, Jr., Chair, Committee on Defense Affairs and State- Federal Relations, Texas House of Representatives, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas (Mar. 14, 2006) (on file with the Opinion Committee, also available al http:ilwww.oag.state.rx.us) [hereinafter Request Letter]. The Honorable Frank J. Carte, Jr. - Page 2 (GA-0463) that an applicant for a peace officer license must demonstrate weapons proficiency), .307(5) (stating that the Commission may issue a license to a person who completes required training and demonstrates weapons proficiency). Thereafter, a peace officer must annually demonstrate firearm proficiency to the employing agency: An agency that employs at least two peace offkers must designate a fuearms proficiency officer and require each officer employed by the agency to demonstrate weapons proficiency to the firearms proficiency officer at least annuahy. See id. 5 1701.355(a). The Commission is directed to define weapons proficiency for the purposes of the annual demonstration. Id. 5 1701.355(c). The Commission has defined and set out the requirements for “firearm proficiency” in title 37, section217.21 ofthe Texas Administrative Code. See 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE§ 217.21 (2006) (“Firearm Proficiency Requirements”). “Firearm proficiency” means the “[s]uccessfuL completion of the annual firearms proficiency requirements.” Id. § 211.1 (a)(27) (“Definitions”). Those annual fuearm proficiency requirements include an external inspection to determine the safety and functioning ofweapons, a demonstration in the care and cleaning of the weapons used, and “a course of fire that meets or exceeds the minimum standards.” Id. 5 217,21(b)(lH3). The minimum firing standards generally require, for a variety of weapons, firing a minimum number of rounds within a specifiedrangeofdistances. See id. 5 217,21(c)(l)-(5). For instance, for handguns,therequirement is “a minimum of 50 rounds, including at least five rounds of duty ammunition, fired at ranges from point-blank to at least 15 yards with at least 20 rounds at or beyond seven yards, including at least one timedreload.” Id. § 217.21(c)(l); see also id § 217.21(c)(2) (shotguns), (3) (rifles), (4) (patrol rifles), (5) (folly automatic weapons). The “minimum passing percentage [must] be 70 for each -firearm.” Id. 5 217.21(d). You have attached with your request the Bureau’s “Handgun Qualification Course” for our review and determination of whether it meets the state’s standard as promulgated by the Commission. See Request Letter, supra note 3, at 1 (Appendix 2). This document sets out the various distances, rounds, positions, and time periods in which a service-authorized handgun must be fired and the minimum qualifying score. See id. We cannot, however, determine as a matter of law that the Bureau’s qualifying standards meet the state’s standard, as required by the Act. First, that questionrequires a factual determination, and we cannot resolve questions of fact in the opinion process. See, e.g., Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. Nos. GA-0156 (2004) at 6, 10 (stating that fact questions cannot be answered in the opinion process); GA-0128 (2003) at 5 (stating that a question requiring resolution of particular facts is “not one in which this office ordinarily engages in the opinion process”). Second, suchadeterminationis more appropriately made by the Commission, the agency charged with promulgating and administering the state’s firearm proficiency standards. Finally, we note that in addition to meeting the state’s firearm proficiency standards, an individual must satisfy the other requirements of the Act for a qualified retired law enforcement officer and carry one of the two types of identi,tication in order to carry concealed fuearms under the Act. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 926C(c)(lH7) (West Supp. 2006) (stating qualifiedretiredlaw enforcement officer requirements), (d) (describing required photographic identification or photographic identification and certification that a qualified retired law enforcement officer must carry). The Honorable Frank J. Corte, Jr. - Page 3 (GA-0463) SUMMARY The federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004 (the “Act”) permits a qualified retired law enforcement ofticer to carry concealed firearms if the officer “has met the State’s standards for training and qualification for active law enforcement officers to carry firearms.” 18 U.S.C.A. 5 926C(c)(5) (West Supp. 2006). In Texas, a qualified retired law enforcement officer must meet the firearms proficiency standards set out in title 37, section 217.21 of the Texas Administrative Code. We cannot, however, determine in an attorney general opinion that any particular agency’s qualifying standards meet the state’s standard, as required by the Act. KENT C. SULLIVAN First Assistant Attorney General ELLEN L. WITT Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel NANCY S. FULLER Chair, Opinion Committee Sheela Rai Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee