Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable Bob Bullock Opinion No. JM-566 Comtitrollerof Public Account:s L.B.J. State Office Buildin!: Be: Whether interest earned on Austin, Texas 70774 the bingo tax, the bank franchise tax, and the mixed beverage tax collected by the state should be remitted to the local jurisdiction for which the taxes were collected Dear Mr. Bullock: In Attorney General Clpinion .JM-539 (19861, we concluded that local taxing units are entitled to be credited with interest earned by the deposit of tax monies ,:ollectedby the state on behalf of those local taxing units pursuant to the Local Sales and Use Tax Act, article 1066~. V.T.C.S.. and articles 1118x and 1118~. V.T.C.S., which authorize the creation of cwtropolitan rapid transit authorities and regional transportation awhorities, respectively. We so concluded because they constituted trust funds. You now wish to know whether interest earned by the depo:;itof tax monies collected pursuant to the bingo tax, the bank franchl,setax, and the mixed beverage tax should be similarly treated. We answer your question in the negative. We conclude that interest earned from the deposit of those taxes should be deposited in the general revenue fund. The Bingo Enabling Act was passed pursuant to article III, section 47. of the Texas {Constitutionand is set forth in article 179d. V.T.C.S. Section 3 OE the act authorizes a commissioners court of a county that has voted to legalize bingo or in which a justice precinct has voted to leg;llJze bingo and the governing body of a municipality that has voted to legalize bingo to impose a two percent gross receipts tax on the conduct of bingo games. Section 24 provides that "[tlhe comptroller of public accounts shall perform all functions incident to the administrat:.on , collection, enforcement, and operation of any tax imposed under this Act." Section 25 declares that "[a] license required to file a tax return shall deliver the monthly return with a remittance of the nc!t amount of the tax due to the office of the comptroller of public accounts." Section 26(a) provides the following: p. 2514 Honorable Bob Bullock - Page 2 (JM-566) Sec. 26. (a) Each jurisdiction's share of all gross receipts tacos collected under this Act by the comptroller of public accounts shall be trans- mitted to the treasurer or the officer of the jurisdiction performing the functions of that office by the comptroller of public accounts pay- able to the jurisdiction periodically as promptly as feasible. Trar.smittalsrequired under this Act shall be made at least twice in each state fiscal year. The funds EO transmitted may be used by the jurisdiction for r.ny purpose for which the general funds of the jurit,dictionmay be used. Section 171.001 of the Tax Code imposes a franchise tax "on each corporation that does business in this state or that is chartered or authorized to do business in this state." Section 171.078 of the Tax Code, which specifically exempted banking corporations from the franchise tax, was repealed tsyActs 1984, 68th Leg..,2nd C.S., ch. 31, art. 3, part B, §I, at 212. Article 3, part B, section 1. of the 1984 repealing act provides in pmt: It is the intention of the legislature that by repealing this section, which provides an exemp- tion for state and federal banking corporations, all banking corporations in this stats become subject to and p,sy the franchise tax imposed by Chapter 171, TaK Code, as provided by this article. Section 171.1031 of the Tax Code defines "gross receipts" of a banking corporation as "interest and dividends received . . . from its business done in this stat.. . ." Section 171.401 of the Tax Code sets forth the following: (a) The revetme from the tax imposed by this chapter on corpo.cations'other than banking cor- porations shall be deposited to the credit of the general revenue fmld. (b) The revenue from the tax imposed by this chapter on banking corporations shall be deposited to the credit of the local government corporate banking franchise tax fund as provided by Article 4366e, Revised Sts.tutes. Article 4366e. V.T.C.!!., creates the Local Government Corporate Banking Franchise Tax Fund and provides the following in pertinent part: p. 2515 Honorable Bob Bullock - Page 3 (J&566) (a) The local government corporate banking franchise tax fund is established in the state treasury. The cosqtroller of public accounts shall keep records of the amount of money deposited to the credit of th’z fund resulting from franchise tax collections from each bank paying the fran- chise tax under Chapter 171, Tax Code, for each bank franchise tax reporting period. The franchise tax collected by the comptroller from each banking corporation shall be apportioned through the fund established by this:article among the taxing units in which the banking corporation’s principal office in this state is situated according to the percentage relaticm~shipthat the property tax rate of each taxing un:.tfor the preceding property tax year bears to tt,e total of the property [sic] rates imposed for the preceding tax year by all of those taxing units. . . . . (d) The compt.roller shall transmit to each taxing unit’s trcasursr, or to the officer per- forming the functions of that office, as promptly as feasible the taxing unit’s share of banking corporation franchise tax collected by the camp- troller, together with the prorated share of any penalty or interest that may be collected. Before transmitting the funds, the comptroller shall deduct two percenl:of the amount allocated to each taxing unit during the period as a charge by the state for its services specified in this section. . . . . . . . (h) All moner distributed to taxing units under this article may be used only by the taxing unit and must be used only for public purposes. Section 202.02 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code imposes a mixed beverage tax of 12 percer,t of the gross receipts from the sale, preparation, or service of mixed beverages. Section 202.04 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code spel::ifies that the tax due must be in the form of a cashier’s check, cert:.fiedcheck, or postal money order payable to the state of Texas and that the Alcoholic Beverage Commission shall deposit the revenue in the mixed beverage tax clearance fund. Section 205.02 provides the followi:lg: p. 2516 Honorable Bob Bullock - Page:4 (JM-566) Text of (a) as amended by Acts 1984, 68th Leg., 2nd C.S., p. 35$, ch. 28, art. II, part B, 512 (a) After alloc:ationof funds to defray admi- nistrative expenses as provided in the current departmental apprc~priationsact, receipts from the sale of tax stamps and funds derived from taxes on distilled spirits, wine, beer, and ale and malt liquor shall be deposited in the general revenue fund. . . . . . . . (c) Receipts derived from the gross receipts tax on mixed beverages imposed by section 202.02 of this code shall be deposited to the credit of a special clearance fund known as the mixed beverage tax clearance funi.. Cf. Acts 1984, 68th Leg., 2nd C.S., ch. 31, art. 2. 922, at 211 (differing amendment with dr.plicativelettering). Section 205.03 creates the Mixed Beverage Tax Clearance Fund and provides the following: (a) In this section, 'permittee' means a mixed beverage permittet,,mixed beverage late hours per- mittee, daily temporary mixed beverage permittee, private club registration permittee, or a private club late hours pc:rmittee. (b) Before the,end of the month following each calendar quarter, the commission shall submit to the comptroller of public accounts a report showing the total amount of taxes received during the quarter from permittees outside an incor- porated city or town within each county and the total amount rece:lvedfrom permittees within each incorporated city or town in each county. (c) As soon as possible after receipt of each quarterly report of the commission, the comp- troller shall 1sst.eto each county a warrant drawn on the mixed beverage tax clearance fund in the amount of 12.5 per'centof receipts from permittees within the county during the quarter and shall issue to each incorporated city or town a warrant drawn on that fund in the amount of 12.5 percent of receipts from permittees within the incor- porated city or t,xm during the quarter, as shown p. 2517 Ronorable Bob Bullock - Pago 5 (JM-566) by the commission's report. The remainder of the receipts for the quarter shall be transferred to its general revenue -- fund. (Emphasis added). The relevant statutes are silent as to the disposition of any interest earned by the deposit of these funds by the state treasurer. Article VIII, section 7, of the Texas Constitution provides the following: The Legislature shall not have power to borrow, or in any manner divert from its purpose, any special fund that may, or ought to, come into the Treasury; and shall make it penal for any person or persons to bor::ow,withhold or in any wanner to divert from its purpose any special fund, or any part thereof. Article VIII, sectior. 7 has been construed to require that interest on constitutionall:rdedicated funds way be spent only for the purposes for which the fund was created; a diversion of such interest to other purposes would vio:Late the constitution. Lawson v. Baker, 220 S.W. 260, 272 (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin 1920, writ ref'd). Con- sequently, interest earned on a constitutional fund must be credited to that fund, unless the constitution itself otherwise directs. Attorney General Opinions .R4-323, .JM-321 (1985); M-468 (1969). The interest on state funds dedicated by statute, however, may be legally severed and placed in the general fund. See Gulf Insurance Co. v. James, 185 S.W.2d 966 (Tel,.1945) (articl~III, section 7, of the Texas Constitution applies only to special funds created by the constitution. not bv statute): Attorney General Ouinions .JM-323, JM-321 (1985j; MW-338 (1981:);..see also Brazos River Conservation h Reclamation District v. McC.caw, 91 S.W.2d 665 (Tex. 1936) (article VIII. section 7 does not ;G'ply to general revenue funds). Article 2543d (since repealed and m-codified as section 3.042(a), V.T.C.S., article 4393-l) effects such a severance of interest on statutory funds as a general rule. Section 3.042(a) of a!rticle 4393-1, V.T.C.S., the article that sets forth the powers and duties of the state treasurer, provides the following: Interest received from time deposits of tconey in funds and account3 in the charge of the treasurer shall be allocated as follows: to each constitu- tional fund there shall be credited the pro rata portion of the it&rest received due the fund; the remainder of thtr interest received, with the exception of that portion required by other statutes to be ccsdited on a pro rata basis to ,- protested tax payments, shall be credited to the p. 2518 Ronorable Bob Bullock - Pagl?. 6 (JM-566) General Revenue Fund. The interest received shall be allocated on-7 monthly basis. (Emphasis added). The funds about which you inquire are not constitutionally dedicated funds; rather, they are statutory funds. Consequently, pursuant to section 3.042(a), the interest on such funds would normally be credited to the General Rmrenue Fund. However, if they are trust funds, interest would be cmdited to principal. ” This office previously has determined that the provisions of what is now section 3.042(a), mticle 4393-1, V.T.C.S., do not apply to interest earned on trust funds that are not the property of the state and that the state treasurer holds as trustee out of the state treasury. Opinions issued by this office consistently have maintained that interest on such trust funds becomes part of the principal. See Attorney General Opinions JM-306, JM-300 (1985); Mu-82 (1979); H-1040 (1977); M-468 (1969). Cf. ,Attorney General Opinions MW-338 (1981); E-1187 (1978). The issu= then, is whether the funds about which you inquire are trust funds, a~ opposed to statutory funds. We conclude that they are not trust funds. The opinions cited abrre indicate that in order to be charac- terized as trust funds, the funds in question should reflect, among other things, (1) that they are administered by a trustee or trustees, (2) that the funds neither are granted to the state in its sovereign capacity nor collected for the general operation of state government, and (3) that they are to bfs spent and invested for specific, limited purposes and for the benefit of a specific group of individuals. Being in the nature of a trust. such funds are entitled to retain the proceeds from their investment. Attorney General Opinions MW-481 (1982); M-468 (1969). It is clear from a reading of the statutes quoted above, that the funds about which you inquire do not manifest sufficient trust fund characteristics. In no case are the funds to be administered by a trustee or trustees or by any public officer "in trust;" rather the statute)3are silent or specifically provide that the fund "is created in th- state treasury." In each instance, the relevant statutes provide that the funds are granted to the state in its sovereign capacity by providing that they be placed "in the general revenue fund." Alt:h.ough the funds are earmarked for general purposes, they are not to be spent or invested for specific, limited purposes or for the benefit of a specific group of individuals. We conclude that the funds created by the collection of the bingo tax, the bank franchise tax, and the mixed beverage tax are statutory funds. Accordingly, we con'clude that taxing units on whose behalf these taxes are collected are not entitled to be credited with interest earned by the depofr!it of these funds; article 4393-1, section 3.042(a), V.T.C.S.. requires that such interest be credited to the General Revenue Fund. p. 2519 Honorable Bob Bullock - Page 7 (m-566) 5UMMARY Funds createi.by the collection of the bingo tax, the bank franchise tax. and the mixed beverage tax are statutory' funds. __ Taxing . units on whose ._. behalf these taxeliare collected are not entitled to be credited with interest earned by the deposit of these funds; article 4393-1, section 3.042(a). V.T.C.S., requirerithat such interest be credited to the General Revenue Fund. JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas JACK HIGHTOWER First Assistant Attorney Ger.eral MARY KELLER Executive Assistant Attorney General RICK GILPIN Chairman, Opinion Committee Prepared by Jim Moellinger Assistant Attorney General p. 2520