Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date filed: 1986-07-02
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                                The Attorney’ General of Texas
                                                     Jmuary   15.        1986
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General
                                                                                T4,.s   (g ph~-o~

s~pwne CourtBuilding            RoMrAble Tim Rod$;c.rs                           Opinion No. m-422
P. 0. BOX m4a                   Wise County Audito!
*ustIn. TX. 78711- 254a         P. 0. Box 899                                    Rc: nether  the offices  of constable
SW4752K)l
                                Decatur, TexAs    ;‘6234                         And city marshal, And the OffiCaS of
TeIaX 91olB7Ll367
Talecopier 31214750266
                                                                                 justice  of the peACA And QnmiCipal
                                                                                 judge. ere incompatible;  And related
                                                                                 matters
714 h3cson. Suite 700
Da~m. T7.. 75202.4506
                                DeAr Hr. Rodgers:
214f742-8944

                                     You Ask:
41J24Albwta Ave.. Suite 1W
El P,so, TX. 799052793                        1. Wether A person Appointed chief of police
91Y5334a
                                           in A city wIthIn the county con cllso serve simul-
                                           taneous!.y AS the elected  ConstAbble of A precinct
 ,001 Texas, Suite 700                     in which the city is located;
 “ovrton. TX. 77002-3111
 7?3’222-5886                                   2.  Vhether A person elected      justice of the
                                           pAACe   iI1 thr pTACitlCt CAn SAX-VA SiSNltAneOUSly AS
 606 Broadway. Suite 312
                                           parttiw     appointed magistrate for the city;  And
 L”~c+ck. TX. 79401.3479
 lxw747.5238                                    3. Whether  either    situation  would present A
                                            risk of increased    liability    on the past of the
                                            county.
 4x39 N. Tentn. Suite B
 MCN.“.   TX. 78501~lS85
 SWSS2.4547                            You advise t1a.t A eun llActed constable in 1982 WAS hired in 1984
                                by A gcnersl     law city located     within the precinct   as its chief of
                                police.     The comti.ssioners    court thereupon declared    the office  of
  200 bin   Plaza. Suite 400
                                constable    VACAOt.  Thereafter,    the man YAS Again elected constable of
  San A”,O”lO. TX. 762052797
                                the precinct,    but the commissioners     court has refused to certify  Xs
  51212254191
                                most recent elcct!.on or to approve his bond.

  An Equal Opportunltyl                 A single ind:lviduAl may not simulr~neously        hold two incompatibLe
  Affirmative Action Employer    offices.     “Incompat.ibility”    is to be distinguishcd    from A “conflict of
                                 intCreSt.”      As saLd. in Attorney   General Opinion JM-172 (198&l:

                                                Ordirra.rily , A mere ’conflict            of        interest’
                                            !&,      21 conflict    created by chr private           pecuniary
                                            interest: of a public officer          or employee)       will not
                                            make a pcrson        legally     ineligible    for       a public
                                            office