Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas December 31, 1982 MARK WHITE Attorney General Mr. Robert B. Baldwin III Opinion No. MW-594 Supreme Court Building Chairman P. 0. BOY 12548 Austin, TX. 76711.2549 Texas State University System Re: Whether institutions of 512/475-2501 Board of Regents higher education may spend ad Telex 9101674-1367 505 Sam Houston Building valorem tax funds received Telecopier 5121475.0266 Austin, Texas 78701 under article VII, section 17 for constr"ction projects 1607 Main Si.. Suite 1400 without coordinating board Dallas. TX. 75201.4709 approval 2141742-6944 Dear Mr. Baldwin: 4624 Alberta Ave., Suite 160 El Paso, TX. 79905.2793 Your letter requesting an Attorney General Opinion states as 9151533-3464 follows: Article VII, section 17 of the Texas 1220 Dallas Ave., Suite 202 Constit"tion, until its recent repeal, provided Houston, TX. 77002.6966 7131650.0666 for a state ad valorem tax 'for the purpose of creating a special fund for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and initially equipping 606 Broadway, Suite 312 buildings or other permanent improvements at the Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 designated institutions of higher learning...' 6061747.5236 The constitutional amendment which repealed article VII, section 17 provided that ad valorem 4309 N. Tenth, Suite S tax receipts which had been distributed to McAllen, TX. 76501-1665 eligible universities 'may be expended for the 5121662-4547 purposes provided under prior law or for repair and renovation of existing permanent 200 Main Plaza. Suite 400 improvements.' A number of universities have San Antonio, TX. 76205.2797 received ad valorem tax monies which they have not 5121225.4191 yet expended. An Equal Opportunity/ Education Code section 61.058(8) requires Affirmative Action Employer institutions of higher education to receive coordinating board approval for 'all new construction and repair and rehabilitation of all buildings and facilities at institutions of higher education.' We respectfully ask whether a project proposed by a university must be approved by the coordinating board if the project is to be p. 2208 Mr. Robert B. Baldwin III - Page 2 (Mw-594) financed in its entirety or partially by ad valorem tax funds. Article VII, section 17 was repealed at the November 2, 1982 election. Article VIII, section l-e of the Texas Constitution was amended at the same election to provide as follows: sec. l-e. No State ad valorem taxes shall be levied upon any property within this State. 2. All receipts from previously authorized State ad valorem taxes that are collected on or after the effective date of the 1982 amendment to this section shall be deposited to the credit of the general fund of the county collecting the taxes and may be expended for county purposes. Receipts from taxes collected before that date shall be distributed by the legislature among institutions eligible to receive distributions under prior law. Those receipts and receipts distributed under prior law may be expended for the purposes provided under prior law or for repair and renovation of existing permanent improvements. The recently enacted amendment authorizes expenditures pursuant to prior law. Since Article VII, section 17 was "self enacting", Coordinating Board approval was not required for the construction of new buildings financed entirely or principally by constitutional tax funds. We therefore conclude that construction financed by funds distributed prior to the enactment of Article VIII, section l-e, may be undertaken without prior Coordinating Board approval. SUMMARY Coordinating Board approval is not required for construction financed by funds distributed prior to adoption of Artice VII, section l-e. Attorney General of Texas JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E. GRAY, III Executive Assistant Attorney General p. 2209