Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas December 22, 1982 MARK WHITE Attorney General Mr. Wake Adkins Open Records Decision No. 338 Supreme Court Building City Attorney P. 0. Box 12546 City of Fort Worth Re: Availability of birth and Austin, TX. 7671% 2546 5121475-2501 1000 Throckmorton death records held by local Telex 9101674.1367 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 registrars TelecoDier 5121475-0266 Dear Mr. Adkins: 1607 Main St., Suite 1400 Dallas, TX. 75201-4709 You have requested our decision under the Open Records Act, 214,742.6944 article 6252-17a, V.T.C.S., as to the availability of birth and death records maintained by a city health department. 4624 Alberta Ave., Suite 160 Section 3(a)(15) of the Open Records Act excepts from disclosure El Paso. TX. 79905-2793 9151533-3464 "birth and death records maintained by the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State of Texas." In Attorney General Opinion H-115 (1973), this office said that this provision also acts to except such records 1220 Dallas Ave., Suite 202 when in the custody of a county clerk "to the extent that he maintains Houston. TX. 77002-6966 records of birth and death of the type maintained by the State Bureau 7131650-0666 of Vital Statistics." The opinion was based upon the following rationale: 606 Broadway. Suite 312 Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 To hold otherwise would present the anomalous 6061747.5236 situation that the State Registrar of vita1 Statistics could not produce a record but that a 4309 N. Tenth. Suite B local registrar or a county clerk could. McAllen, TX. 76501-1665 5121662.4547 In Open Records Decision No. 307 (1982), we held that article 6600, V.T.C.S., which directs a county clerk to furnish "attested 200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 copies whenever demanded of all papers recorded in his office," San Antonio, TX. 78205.2797 requires the conclusion that "birth and death records kept by a county 5121225-4191 clerk are not excepted from disclosure under any provision of the Open Records Act." Attorney General Opinion H-115 was overruled "to the An Equal Opportunity/ extent of conflict." Since Open Records Decision No. 307 addressed Affirmative Action Employer only the question of birth and death records maintained by a county clerk, you ask whether the same result is applicable to such records in the custody of a city health department. Although Open Records Decision No. 307 based its result on the mandate of a statute first enacted in 1836, the existence of that statute completely undermines the reasoning of Attorney General Opinion H-115. If birth and death records must be disclosed when in the custody of a county clerk, but are excepted when maintained by the Mr. Wade Adkins - Page 2 Bureau of Vital Statistics, the rationale of that opinion does not exist. When the legislature created the exception for state vital statistics information in section 3(a)(15), it must be presumed to have been aware that such records were disclosable when held at the county level. The only reasonable alternative to the reasoning of Attorney General Opinion H-115 is to conclude that, when the legislature enacted section 3(a)(15), it chose its language carefully and meant thereby to except only those birth and death records which are maintained by the Bureau of vita1 statistics. Such an interpretation, in addition, follows the well established rule of construction that every sentence, clause, phrase and word of a statute is presumed to have been used for a purpose, and accordingly, should be given effect, if reasonably possible. Eddins-Walcher Butane Company v. Calvert, 298 S.W.2d 93, 96 (Tex. 1957). Had the legislature intended to except all vital statistics information, wherever maintained, it need not have appended to section 3(a)(15) the clause "maintained by the Bureau of Vital Statistics." Moreover, rule 54a of article 4477, V.T.C.S., authorizes a local registrar who issues certified copies of death certificates to charge the same fees charged by a state registrar. This language, added in 1979, further indicates the legislature's intent that such records be available upon request from local registrars. Acts 1979, 66th Leg., ch. 543, 82, at 1135. This result is not without precedent. In Open Records Decision NO. 144 (1976), we noted that, although conviction information is readily available from court files, it need not be disclosed when in the custody of the Department of Public Safety, by virtue of section 3(a)(8) of the Open Records Act. We conclude that birth and death records maintained by a city health department are not excepted from disclosure under the Open Records Act. Attorney General Opinion H-115 is hereby overruled. MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOBN W. FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E. GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by Rick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General Mr. Wade Adkins - Page 3 APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Rick Gilpin Patricia Hinojosa Jim Moellinger