Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

‘i’he Attorney General of Texas September 26, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General Honorable W. E. Snelson Opinion No. I-I-12 4 7 Chairman Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Re: Authority of a county Relations under the Airport Zoning Act. State Capitol Austin, Texas 787ll Dear Senator Snelson: You have requested our opinion regardii the authority of a county underthe Airport Zoning Act, article 46e-l-13, V.T.C.S. You state that a land developer has proposed to build a residential subdivision on land near the Kingsville Naval Air Station. Ihe Commissioners Court of Kleberg County is 723Wb.SWlb610 concerned that the Navy might be compelled to abandon its use of the air -Tx77ooz space in the vicinity of the proposed development, or to close the base n- entirely. You inquire as to the circumstances under which the commissioners court may exercise zoning authority over the land. Article 46e-3 provides, in pertinent part: 0 In order to prevent the creation or establishment 4613HTUlth,SUiWP of airport hazards, every political subdivision having #Acubn.lx.76601 an airport hazard withii its territorial limits may w2mK-647 adopt, administer, and enforce, under the police Rower and in the manner and upon the conditions hereinafter prescribed, airport zoning regulations for such airport hazard area, which regulations may divide such area into zones, and, within such zones, specify the land uses permitted and regulate and restrict the height to which structures and trees may be erected or allowed to grow. “Airport hazard” is defined as any structure or tree or use of land which obstructs the air space required for the flight of aircraft or which obstructs or interferes with. the control or P. 4958 Honorable W. E Snelson - Page 2 (B-1247) tracking and/or data acquisition in the landing, taking off or flight at an airport, or at any installation or facility relating to flight, and tracking and/or data acquisition of flight craft. . . . Article 46e-l(2). An “airport” under the statute includes any air facility ‘utilized by . . . the Government of the United States or any agency thereof in furtherance of the National Defense. . . .” Article 46e-l(1). In our opinion, article 46e3 clearly authorizes the Kleberg County Commissioners Court to adopt airport zoning regulations whenever it deems it necessary to prevent the creation of an “airport haxard” within its~jurisdiction. Whether any particular use of land might constitute an airport hazard of-course requires the consideration of facts which are not before us. SUMMARY The Kleberg County Commissioners Court may exercise zoning authority over land in the vicinity of the’ Kingsville Naval Air Station if such regulation is necessary to prevent the establishment of an “airport hazard,” as defined in the Airport Zoning Act, article 46e-1-13, V.T.C.S. Attorney General of Texas APPROVED: DAVID hl. KENDALL, First Assistant C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee P. 4959