Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas January 4, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General Honorable John Wilson, Chairman Opinion No. H-1109 Committee on Health and Welfare House of Representatives Re: Whether consent of Austin, Texas next-of-kin is required for the taking of cornea1 tissue from a decedent Dear Chairman Wilson: under H.B. 307. You have requested our opinion concerning the following question: k&y a medic&examiner or justice of the peace permit the removal of cornea1 t'issue by an eye bank official from a decedent who dies under circumstances requiring an inquest without the prior consent of the decedent's next-of-kin? You have referred us to article 4590-4, V.T.C.S., enacted as House Bill 307,of the 65th Legislature, wh.ich provides in part: Section 1. On a request from an autho- rized official of a nonprofit corporation chartered under the laws of Texas, to obtain, store, and distribute donor eyes to be used by those licensed to practice medicine for cornea1 transplants, for research, or for other medical purposes and whose medical activities are directed by one licensed to practice medicine in Texas, for cornea1 tissue, the justice of the peace or the medical examiner may permit the taking of cornea1 tissue if: (1) the decedent from whom the tissue is to be taken died under circumstances requiring an inquest by the justice of the peace or the medical examiner; p. 4543 ., ’. Honorable John Wilson - Page 2 (U-1109) (2) no objection by a person listed in Section 2 of this Act is known by the justice of the peace or the medical examiner; and (3) the removal of cornea1 tissue will not interfere with the subsequent course of an investigation or autopsy, or alter the postmortem facial appear- ance. . . . . Sec. 3. The justice of the peace, the medical examiner, and the eye bank official are not liable for damages in a civil action brought by a person listed in Section 2 of this Act who has not objected prior to the removal of the corneal:tissue on any theory of civil recovery based on a contention that the consent of plaintiff was required prior to the removal of cornea1 tissue as autho- rized by this Act. Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 11, at 26-27. Section 2 of the Bill provides for objections by certain relatives. In light of the positive authorization-in section 1 and the protection from liability in section 3 it is abundantly clear that, so long as no objection has been made, consent of next-of-kin is not necessary for the removal of cornea1 tissue from a decedent who died under circumstances requiring an inquest. See generally Love v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 99 S.W.2d 646 (Tex. Civ. App. -- Beaumont 1936), aff'd, 121 S.W.Zd 986 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1938, opinion adopted). SUMMARY A medical examiner or justice of the peace may permit the removal of cornea1 tissue by an eye bank official for a decedent who dies under circumstances requiring an inquest without the prior consent of the decedent's next-of-kin. p. 4544 . . “* Eionorable John Wilson T Page 3 (ii-1109) . Very truly yours, APPROVED: DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant jst P. 4545