OF TEXAS
AUHTIN. TICXAS 78711
July 21. 1975
Mrs. Charles (Betty) Cleland, Opinion No. H-644
Executive Secretary
Texas State Board of Examiners Re: State Board of Examiners of
of Psychologists Psychologists use of employees to
108 West 15th Street, Suite 103 screen applicants for examination.
Austin, Texas 78701
Dear Mrs. Cleland:
You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of the State Board
of Examiners of Psychologists to employ persons, including former Board mem-
bers, to screen applicants for examination.
The State Board of Examiners of Psychologists was created in 1969 by
article 4512c, V. T. C. S., to administer the Psychologists’ Certification Act.
It is the duty of the Board to certify as a psychologist those qualified applicants
for certification who successfully pass the examination prescribed by the Board.
Section 7 of article 4512c, V. T. C. S., provides in part:
The Board may employ such other persons
as it deems necessary or desirable to carry
out the provisions of this Act.
Subject to the limitations of article 4512c, sec. 6, V. T. C. S., which concerns
the Licensing Fund, and the General Appropriations Act, (63rd Leg. , 1973,
HB 139 Ch. III p. 122), we believe the Board is authorized to employ persons to
assist in the performance of its duties, including the duty to determine that
applicants for examination are qualified. But the Legislature delegated to the
Board alone the power to determine whether applicants are qualified or not quali-
fied to take the exammation.
That function requires quasi-judicial fact-finding by the Board and it must
exercise its own discretion and judgment in such matters, guided by the legisla-
tively set standards, and may not re-delegate that power to others. While it
may utilize investigative assistance and advice of its employee.s, the Board must
make the final decisions itself and it will be legally responsible for the decisions
made. -See generally, Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists,
p. 2832
Mrs. Charles (Betty) Cleland - Page 2
492 S. W. 2d 460 (Tex. Sup. 1973); Krug V. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. ,
245 F. 2d 848 (5th Cir. 1957); 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Administrative Law, 5 222;
Attorney General Opinion H-386 (1974).
SUMMARY
The State Board of Examiners of Psycholo-
gists may employ persons, including former Board
members if appropriate, to assist it in screening
applicants for examination but it may not delegate to
such persons any quasi-judicial functions delegated
to the Board by the Legislature.
Very truly yours,
Attorney General of Texas
APPROVED:
Opinion Committee
jad:
p. 2833
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion