Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

July 25, 1974 The Honorable James J. Kaster Opinion No. H- 355 Chairman Intergovernmental Affairs Committee Re: Constitutionality of Art. House of Representatives 6951, V. T. C. S. P.O. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78767 Dear Representative Kaster: As Chairman of the House Intergovernmental Affairs Committee you have requested our opinion as to the validity of Article 695L Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, (Acts 1971, 62nd Leg., ,R.S., ch. 216, p. 1056.) Section 1 of the Article reads: Section 1. The Commissioners Court of every county in this State, the governing body of each hospital district, and the governing body of each city in this State with a population of 10, 000 or more, according to~the last preceding federal census, shall establish and maintain a uniform system of accounting whereby adequate and accurate records are compiled setting forth all the expenditures made by the county, city, or hospital district in connection with any of its welfare assistance programs. Section 2 provides that the Comptroller of Public Accounts, with the assistance of the Depa,rtment of Public Welfare and the State Auditor shall develop and prescribe the uniform system. Section 3 requires quarterly reports from the governmental bodies listed in Section 1 p. 1671 The Honorable James J. Kaster page 2 (H-355) setting out all their expenditures in connection with welfare assistance programs. The report is to be on a form prepared by the Comptroller. Section 4 provides that the information generated by the reports will be kept and maintained by the Comptroller to be used by other state agencies. Section 51-a of Article. 3 of the Texas Constitution, the section generally authorizing welfare payments and saving them from other pro- hibitions of other sections against grants of public funds to individuals, specifically authorizes statutes such as Article 6951, supra. .The Legislature shall have the power, by General Laws, to provide, subject to limitations herein con- tained, and ,such other limitations, restrictions and regulations as may by the Legislature be deemed expedient for assistance grants . . . . Certainly it cannot be complained that Article 695i is a special law in violation of Article 3, Section 56 of the Constitution. See Attorney General Opinion H-8 (1973) and authorities cited there. Nor do we think it any ground for complaint that there may be counties, hospital districts and cities covered by the act which have no reportable expendit.ures made in connection with a welfare assistance program. The filing by such entities of a. negative report may furnish those interested with an, important or useful statistic. In short, we see no reason to hold thatthis is not a valid regulation ordered by the Legislature under its broad Constitutional powers to oversee welfare programs. SUMMARY The requirements of Article 6951, V. T. C. S., that counties, hospital di.stricts and:ertain cities p. 1672 The Honorable James J. Kaster page 3 (H-355) must adopt a uniform system of accounting and make quarterly reports of expenditures made for welfare programs are valid. _Very truly yours, APPR VED: v ~~~~~. ~-Attorney General of Texas A &TJfiJz DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee pa 1673