Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable Homer A. Foerster Opinion NO. M-1284 Executive Director State Board of Control Re: Whether the Board of Control P. 0. Box 13047, Capitol Station may expend funds out of its Austin, Texas 78711 Item 19 appropriation for the 1972 year for classified salaries for repairmen, etc., Dear Mr. Foerster: and related questions. Your request for an opinion reads as follows: "The General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year beginning September 1, 1972, provides on Page 111-44, line item 19, an appropriation to the Board of Control as follows: "'19. For operating expenses of a Central Repair Service of dictating equipment owned by State agencies in Austin . . . $27,651' "The question before me as a result of the language used in the appropriation is as follows: "(11 Can the Board of Control expend funds out of this appropriation for 'classified salaries' for repairmen, for 'consumable supplies and materials,' for 'current and recurring operating expenses,' and for 'capital outlay'? "(21 If the above is answered in the affirma- tive, is the State Comptroller authorized to issue warrants for those operating expenses enumerated in paragraph (1) including classified salaries? "Reference is made to Paragraph 1, Section 10, Article V on Page V-37 of the General Appropriations Bill which is quoted as follows: "'Section 10. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF OTHER EXPENSE FUNDS FOR PAYING SALARIES AND WAGES. Funds appropriated in Article I, II, and III of . - Hon. Homer A. Foerster, page 2 (M-1284) this Act, in items designated for consumable supplies and materials, current and recurring operating expense or capital outlay shall be ex- pended only for items set out in the Comptroller's Manual of Accounts, Expenditure Classification, effective November 1, 1965. as amended, and number from 10 to 19 for "consumable supplies'and materials," 20 through 28 for "current and recurring operating expense," and 60 to 69 for "capital outlay." It is further provided that such terms shall not include expenditures for personal services including salaries and wages, unless the language of those items explicitly authorizes such use.' (Emphasis added.) "Quoted below is a portion of the letter of April 7, 1972 (copy attached) prepared and submitted by the Executive Director of the Board of Control which was directed to the Legislative Budget Board and the Governor's Division of Operations Analysis wherein the request was made for the appropriation authorized in line item 19: "'NEW PROGRAM, DICTATING EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE Request funding, as follows, for FY-73 as a separate line item to provide a central repair service on dictating equipment owned by State agencies located within the Capitol Complex area: Personal Services (Group 12-9733) Instrument and Office Machine Repairman III (1) $ 8,352 (Group 11-9732) Instrument and Office Machine Repairman II (2) 15,624 Other Expenses Insurance, 3 men - $150 each 456 Repair parts 1,000 Tools and test equipment 225 Capital outlay, one (1) motor scooter 2,000 Grand Total $27,651' . . Hon. Homer A. Foerster, page 3 (M-1284) "Reference is also made to line items 15, 16, and 17 in the Board of Control appropriation where 'operating expenses' does include all the expenses enumerated in paragraph 1 above. "It is the opinion of the Board of Control that the legislature intended the words 'operating expenses' in line item 19 to include 'salaries,' 'consumable supplies and materials,' 'current and recurring operating expenses,' and 'capital outlay.' All expenses enumerated are necessary to carry out the program authorized." Item 7 of the appropriation to the State Board of Control is for salaries of classified positions. Item 19 reads as follows: "For the Year Ending August 31, 1973 "19. For operating expenses of a Central Repair Service of dictating equipment owned by State agencies in Austin $27,651" Item 19 was appropriated _ specifically for the new program outlined in your request and in the exact amount Duagetea by tne Board of Control for the program, which budget was apparently ap- proved by the Legislature in making this item of appropriation. The phrase "operating expenses" as used in this overall context in Item 19 is not to be given the same construction as "current and recurring operating expenses" in a general item of appropriation. Such construction would in effect render meaningless the appropriation contained in Item 19. It is therefore our opinion that it was the intent of the Legislature in appropriating Item 19 to make an appropriation for the items of expenditure outlined in your budget which is set out in your request. You are accordingly advised that the operating expenses of a central repair service of dictating equipment includes all 'he expenses outlined in your request and such expenses may be paid from Item 19 of the appropriation to the State Board of Control. -6302~. Hon. Homer A. Foerster, page 4 (M-1284) SUMMARY Item 19 of the appropriation to the State Board of Control for operating expenses of a central repair service of dictating equipment may be used to pay for necessary expenses re- lating to such program, including classified salaries for repairmen, consumable supplies and materials and capital outlay. truly yours, Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. E. Allen, Chairman J. C. Davis Jim Broadhurst Jack Goodman Houghton Brownlee SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant ._ 6303_