Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. . TEE ATTOECNEY GENERAL UD,PmXAS' AXiwrIS, TEXAS 18711 November 29, 1972 Honorable Hugh C. Yantis Opinion No. M- 1272 Executive Director Texas Water Quality Board Re: Whether a person employed P. 0. Box 13246, Capitol Station as a secretary at the Texas Austin, Texas 78711 Water Quality Board may lawfully sell copies of her transcripts of minutes of the agency and charge Dear Mr. Yantis: therefor. Your request for an opinion reads in part as follows: "Our agency often receives requests for transcripts of monthly meetings of the Texas Water Quality Board. It has been our practice to satisfy these requests by allowing the per- sons making the request to make a copy of the magnetic tape which is our official record of the meeting. One of the secretaries, employed by this agency, prepares the minutes of our Board meetings. She uses a shorthand machine to record the meeting, but only prepares ver- batim transcripts of the parts of the meeting which are needed for our purposes. It would be a convenience to the general public, al- though of small benefit to our agency, to be able to purchase transcripts of Board meetings from this secretary. II. . . "We respectfully request an opinion on whether or not this secretary can make and sell for her own profit transcriptions of Texas Water Quality Board Meetings." In Moore v. Sheppard, 144 Tex. 537, 192 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. Sup. 1946), it was held that Clerks of the Courts of Civil Appeals were not required to account to the State Treasurer for sums of -6247- Hon. Hugh C. Yantis, page 2 (M-1272) money collected for uncertified and unofficial copies of opinions, wherein it was stated: ,I . . . The general principle prohibiting public officials from charging fees for the performance of their official duties does not prohibit them from charging for their services for acts that they are under no obligation, under the law, to perform. . . . 11. . . "There being no statutory duty requiring petitioners to furnish uncertified, unofficial copies of opinions of the Courts of Civil Appeals, no statute fixing any fee for such services, and no valid statute requiring that money received therefore be deposited in the State Treasury, there is no debt owing by petitioners to the State. Since petitioners are not required to account to the State Treasurer, under the exist- ing statutes, for such receipts, they cannot be required to execute an affidavit that such funds have been deposited in the State Treasury as a condition for the delivery of their monthly salary warrants." It is our opinion that the principle of law announced in Moore v. Sheppard is equally applicable to other State employees in the absence of relevant statutes. We have been unable to find any statute requiring the furnishing of transcripts of the meetings of the Board to the public. Therefore, it is our opinion that a secretary employed by the Texas Water Quality Board may make transcripts of official meetings of the Board and sell them and retain the pro- ceeds provided such acts do not interfere with the performance of her duties as a State employee. SUMMARY A secretary employed by the Texas Water Quality Board may make transcripts of official meetings of the Board and sell them and retain the proceeds pro- vided such acts do not interfere with the performance of her duties as a State employee. -6248- . I Hon. Hugh C. Yantis, page 3 (M-1272) ney General of Texas Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Max Hamilton Bill Craig John Traylor Bob Lemens SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant -6249-