Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Hon. Joe Resweber Opinion No. M-1056 County Attorney Harris County Courthouse Re: Questions relating to powers Houston, Texas 77002 of the Harris County Juvenile Board concerning budgets and salaries of the Probation Department and county institu- tions for the care of neglected, dependent and delinquent children, pursuant to Article 5139VV, Vernon's Civil Dear Mr. Resweber: Statutes. Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this office concerning the referenced matter poses the following questions: "(1) What are the powers of the Harris County Juvenile Board regarding the annual budgets of the Probation Department and of the County Institutions for the care of neglected, dependent and delinquent children? "(2) What are the powers of the Harris County Juvenile Board to establish a general personnel policy for employees of the proba- tion department and the county institutions for the care of neglected, dependent and ae- linquent children, including but not limited to employee classification system, duties of each employee position, qualifications of each employee position, and a compensation plan to insure equal pay for equal work?" The Harris County Juvenile Board was established by Article 5139VV, Vernon's Civil Statutes , enacted,and effective in 1965. Section 5(a) of that Article provides as follows: "The Chief Probation Officer under the direction of the juvenile board shall prepare the annual budget.of the probation,department -5155- Hon. Joe Resweber, page 2 (M-1056) and of the county institutions for the care of neglected, dependent, and delinquent children. The juvenile board then shall submit the budget it approves to the Com- missioners Court for final approval in the same manner as prescribed by law for the f County." (Emphasis added). Article 1666a, Vernon's Civil Statutes, enacted in 1934 dealing with certain county auditors, provides, in part, as follows: "The County Auditor in all counties having a population in excess of two hundred and twenty- five thousand (225,000) as shown by the last preceding or any future United States Census shall serve as the budget officer for the 'CommissionersCourts in each county, and on or immediately after January 1st of each year he shall prepare a budget to cover all pro- posed expenditures of the county government for the current fiscal and calendar year."_. (Emphasis added). We take judicial notice that Harris County falls within the population bracket set in Article 1666a, and is thus governed by its provisions. A reading of the foregoing statutes indicates that ther is an apparent 'inconsistentresponsibility for the-preparation c the budgets of the agencies under the Harris County Juvenile Boz with Article 5139W delegating such responsibility to the Board, on the one hand, and Article 1666a delegating such responsibilit to the County Auditor, on the other. We are of the opinion that the doctrine of implied reps of the earlier Article 1666a by the later Article 5139W is ap- plicable to thenforegoing inconsistency. Article 5139W must govern in answering the question of who is responsible for pre- paring the budget of the institutions under the control of the Harris County Juvenile Board. That doctrine has been stated as follows: "The doctrine of implied repeal rests on the principle that the last expression of the -5156- Hon. Joe Resweber, page 3 (M-1056) lawmakers will be given effect. A statute does not, - of,course, . .. abrogate -_. or effect . an earlier .. two. law wnen tnere is no conrlict netween tne But an act that is later in point of time con- trols, repeals, or supersedes an earlier act, in so far as the two are inconsistent and ir- reconcilable and cannot both stand at the same time. 11 53 Tex.Jur.2d 149-50, Statutes, Sec. ioi.' e See also, Attorney General's Opinion No. M-472 (1969). It is no objection to the application of the doctrine of implied repeal that a special act (Article 5139W) is im- pliedly repealing inconsistent portions of a general act (Article 1666a). 53 Tex.Jur.2d 161-62, Sec. 111.. We, therefore, hold that Section 5(a) of Article 5139W, empowering the Chief Probation Officer, under the direction of the Harris County avenile Board, to prepare the annual budgets of the probation department and the county institutions for the care of children set forth in that Section, impliedly repeals those portions of Article 1666a that are inconsistent therewith. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section S(a), the Commissioners Court of Harris County can modify, alter, or ap- prove the budget submitted by the Chief Probation Officer, just as it can modify, alter, or approve the budget submitted by the County Auditor. In the memorandum brief submitted with your letter, you also raise the point as to whether Sections 13 and 16 of Article 5139W are in conflict with Articles 3912k and 3902f-5, Vernon's Civil Statutes, both latter Articles being enacted in 1971. We find no conflict between those statutes, and feel that they can be harmonized when they are construed.in pari materia. 53 Tex.Jur.Zd 280-84, Sec. 186. Article 3912k authorizes the Com- missioners Court to fix the amount of compensation, office expense, travel expense, and all other allowances for county employees who are paid wholly from county funds. Article 3902f-5 further empowers the Commissioners Court, ,under certain conditions, to increase the compensation of any subject employee in an amount not to exceed 35%. Both of those Articles would thus encompass employees under the con- trol of the Juvenile Board. -5157- lion.Joe Resweber, page 4 (M-1056) pursuant to'sections 13 and 16 of Article 5139W, th Juvenile Board is given authority to prepare the budget for the salaries and expenses of the employees of the probation departme and those of the county institutions for the care of neglected, dependent, and delinquent children. Both of those Sections ex- plicitly require the approval of the Commissioners Court before said budgets shall become fixed by law. Applying the rule of construction in pari materia, wt are of the opinion that the initial responsibility of preparing the budgets set forth in Sections 13 and.16 of Article 5139W rests with the Juvenile Board, but that such.budgets are subject to,the approval of the Commissioners Court, and to the exercise ( the Commissioners Court's prerogatives set forth in Articles 3912 aa 3902f-5. There is no conflict between these statutes, and, therefore, no occasion to appl.ythe doctrine of implied repeal vis-a-via Sections 13 and 16. .We are furtherof the opinion that your second questi is answered in all respects by Section 5(d) of Article 5139W, which provides, in full, as follows: "The juveni3.eboard subject to the ap- proval of the Commissioners Court shall es- tablish a general personnel policyfor the employees of the probation department and the employees of the probation department and the county institutions for the care of neglected, dependent, and delinquent children. The board shall establish and maintain an em- .ployee classification system including; "(1) an accurate statement of duties of each employee position; "(2) stated qualifications of each em- ployee position; and "(3) a compensation plan which will in- sure equal pay for equal work." You are therefore advised that the Harris County Juven Board, subject to the approval of the Commissioners~. Court, has the authority to do each of the acts set forth inyour second question -5158- Hon. Joe Resweber, page 5 (M-1056) SUMMARY (1) The Chief Probation Officer, under the direction of the Harris County Juvenile Board, rather than the County Auditor, has the power and duty to prepare the annual budgets of the probation department and of the county institu- tions for the care of neglected, dependent and delinquent children, pursuant to Section 5(a) of Article 5139W, Vernon's Civil Statutes. To the extent that any provisions of Article 1666a, Vernon's Civil Statutes, relating to the duties of the Harris County Auditor in the above respect, are in conflict with Section 5 (a), they are repealed by implication. (2) The Harris County Juvenile Board has the power to establish a general personnel policy for employees of the probation department and the county institutions for the care of neglected, dependent and delinquent children, and to main- tain an employee classification system including, but not limited to, a statement . * of duties of each employee position , qualifications of each em- ployee position, and a compenation plan to insure equal pay for equal work. ? Very truly/)rours, ney General of Texas Prepared by Austin C. Bray, Jr. Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Dunk Sullivan David Longoria Arthur Sandlin Robert Darden SAW MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOIA WHITE First Assistant -5159-