Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

, July 9, 1970 Hon. J. W. Edgar Opinion NO. M-658 Commissioner of Education 201 East 11th Street Re: Whether trustees of an Austin, Texas Independent School District have authority to adopt procedures for recall elections for members of such board. Dear Dr. Edgar: We are in receipt of your letter requesting an opinion in regard to the above stated question. We quote from your letter as follows: "The Board of Trustees of an independent school district (Wichita Falls), recently presented with a resolution by local patrons urging the Board to adopt and implement procedures for recall elections for removal of trustee members of such school board, has requested me to submit to the Office of Attorney General for an opinion the following question: "Does the board of trustees of the Wichita Falls school district have the power, expressed or implied, under common law or the statutes of Texas to adopt a resolution or policy providing procedures to effect petition and recall elections of member(s) of its school board?" Trustees of independent school districts are ccnsidered "county officers" subject to the provisions of Section 24 of Article V of the Texas Constitution. Fowler v. Thomas, 275 S.W. 253 (Tex.Civ.App. 1925, err. dismd.). -3149- . - . Hon. J. w. Edgar, Page 2 (M-658) Section 24 of Article V is quoted as follows: "County Judges, County Attorneys, clerks of the District and County Courts, Justices of the Peace, Constables, and other county officers, may be removed by the judges of the district courts for incompetency, official misconduct, habitual drunken- ness, or other causes defined by law, upon the cause therefor being set forth in writing and the find- ing of its truth by a jury." (Emphasis added.) The above method and the statutes enacted pursuant thereto (Articles 5970, et seq) of removing county officers from office are exclusive. Griver v. Thomas, 101 Tex. 36, 104 S.W. 1058 (1907); State ex rel Downs v. Harvey, 164 S.W.2d 55 (Tex.Civ. APP. 1942, err. ref. w.0.m.); Jordan v. Crudqinoton, 149 Tex. 237, 231 S.W.2d 641 (1950). In light of the above cited constitutional provision and the cases cited, it is our opinion hat the school board has no authority to prescribe a method i- or removal of individual trustees by recall or otherwise which may be inconsistent with said constitutional provision or statutes. SUMMARY The Board of Trustees of the Wichita Falls School District has no authority to adopt a resolution or policy providing for recall elections of i General of Texas Prepared by James C. McCoy Assistant Attorney General -3150- I , I , Hon. J. W. Edgar, page 3 (M-658) APPROVED : OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, CO-Chairman Mitchell William6 Wardlow Lane Jerry Roberts Bob Giddings MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant ALFRED WALKER FXecUtiVe ASSiStant -3151-