Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Hon. Joe Resweber Opinion No. M- 223 County Attorney in Harris County Courthouse Rer Authority of the Harris Houston, Texas 77002 County Hospital District to sped public funds to pay transportationand other costs for recruit- ing and int0rviewing prospectiveemployees Dear Mr. Resweberz and related question. You havq requested this office.to issue~a legal opinion on the following two questioner "'1. Can the Harris Hospital District spend public funds to pay transportationand other costs for the purpose of recruiting and interviewingprospectiveemployees? “‘2. Does the Hospital District have the authority to spend public funds to pay moving and other cwta for moving employees... hired by the Administrator?@" Your quastion No. 1. _ The Harris County Hospital District was created under the prwisions of Article 4494n, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Sec- tion 5 of saia Article provides for inBoard of Hospital Managers who "shall aDdnt a qeneral manager (administrator)who 'shall supervise ali-of the-work and activities of,the District, and have general direction of the affaira of the District. . . . I” It further provides that the Board of Managers shall have the authority to employ such doctora, nurses, techniciansand other employaes of every kind ana character as msy be aavisable for -1068- Hon. Joe Resweber, page 2 (~-223) the efficient operation of the hospital system." By virtue of the express power of the Board of Hospital Managers to hire necessary personnel, it has the implied power to do what is reasonable and necessary to perform such duty. This office has unifotiy stated that the determinationof what constitutes reasonable and necessary expenses is a question of fact and is to be determined, in the first instance,by the state agency involved. Attorney General's Opinions Nos. O-995 (19391, +3670 (1941) and V-607 (1948). This office ii Attorney General's Opinion O-6766 (1945) statea that a member of the Board of the Texas State Library and Historic61 Commission,when authorized by the Board to interview applicants for the position of State Librarian, would be engaged in "State business*'when traveling for that purpose. It is therefore our opinion that the Harris County Hospital District, if it finds that it is reasonable and nec- essary in order to secure its required staff, may pay trans- portation and other traveling expenses of its personnel when traveling for the purpose of recruiting and interviewing prospectiveemployees. We point out, hwever, that the Hospital District is not authorized to pay the traveling expenses of applicants for positions in the hospital. The trips to Houston by prospective employees for the purpose of being interviewedwould not con- stitute "State business" as they are neither egents or employees of the Hospital District. The payment of euch traveling expense would constitute the granting of public money or thing of value to an individual,which is expressly prohibitedby Section 52 of Article III of the Texas Constitution. Accord, Attorney Gen- eral's Opinion O-6766 (1945). Your queetion No. 2. We can find no provision in Article 4494n, Vernon's Civil Statutes, authorieing the Hospital District to spend public funas to pay moving and other costs for moving employees hired by the District. In Attorney General's Opinion O-4537 (1942) it was held that the Texas National Guard Armory Board -1@59- Hon. Joe Resweber, page 3 (M-223) was not authorized to pay the expenses of its Secretary in moving personal household effects from one city to another. The Constitution of Texas expressly prohibits any political subaivision of the State:to lend its credit or grant public money or thing of value in aid of any individual. Tex. Const. Art. III, Sec. 52. Unless compensationis provided by law for an official service required to be performed, and the amount fixed by law, none can lawfully be charged ,therefor. Nueces Countv v. Currinston. 139 Tex. 297, 162 S.W.Zd 687 (1942). By virtue of the above authoritieswe.answer your second question in the negative. SUMMARY The Harris County Hospital District may spend public money to pay the reasonable ana necessary travel expenses of its personnel in recruiting and interviewing prospectiveemployees. The Hospital District is not authorized to pay the traveling expenses, to Houston or else- where, of applicants for positions in the hospital. The Hospital District is not authorized to spend public money to pay moving and other costs for mwing employees hired by ths District. Sec- tion 52 of Article III, Texas Constitution. At- torney,General's Opinion O-4537 (1942). truly yours, !h lLi2EL C. MARTIN ney General of Texas Prepared by Jack Sparks Assistant Attorney General - 1070 - . - Hon. JOT Resweber, page 4 m-223) APPRWRD I OPINION CCMMITTER Hawthorne Phillips, Chairum Kerns Taylor, Co-Cheirnmn W. V. Oeppert W. 0. Shultz Ralph Ra.sh John Grace A. J. CARUBBI, JR. Executive Assistant -1071-