Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

July 10, 196-j’ Hon. Milton J. Schlller Opinion No. M- 101 Chairman, ContingentBxpense Committee Re: Interim expenses of House of Representatives members of the House Austin, Texas of Representatives, 60th Legislature. Dear Mr. Schlller: Your request for an opinion reads as Sollows: “iouse Simple Resolution No. 448 by Wayne, a copy of which Is attached, was passed during the Regular Session of the-sixtiethLegislature. “Pursuantto.the’provisionscontained on Page 6, concerningthe rental of electric type- writers and transcribingequipment,an official opinion Is respectfullyrequested, as follows: “1. Provided a Member of the House has filed a rental agreement for such equipment, and over a period of time, after monthly rental payments have been made to the business firm, may such accumulatedrental paynientsbe used as equity toward the actual purchase OS the equlp- ment, provided the Member makes the final payment from his personal funds? “2. IS the above opinion Is In the afflrma- tlve, and such equity may be applied toward final purchase, would such equipment become the personal property of the Member of the House, or would It become the property of the State of Texas, subject to the Property Inventory Laws of the State? “we will appreciateyour oSSlclal opinion on this matter at your earliest convenience. * -456- Hon. Milton J. Schlller, page 2 (M-101) In Terre11 vs. King, 118 Tex. 237, 14 S.W.2d 786'(1929), It was held that a nesolutlonwas an appropriateand constitutional method to direct the expenditureof a portion of appropriationfor the expenses of members of the Legislaturebetween sessions. In that case, the Court upheld a portion of the Resolutionwhereby members of an Interim committee would receive certain expenses ln- curred In the conduct of the commltteetsduties. The Court stated: 'It Is manifest that certain expenditures must be made by the state, in the way of legislative expenses, or the grant of legislativepower could never be effectuallyexercised. No one would question legislativedisbursementsfor comfortableassembly halls andcommittee rooms, or for clerks, stationery, .etc. Within the same category of legitimateexpenses of the Legislature or of either hquse comes relmburse- ment to members for actual expenses reasonably Incurred In order to perform duties devolving on duly authorized committeesof the Legislature,or of either house, when such committeemembers are called to other points than the capital, or when called to the capital oiher- wise than durlng the sessions of the Legislature. It Is noted that at the time Terre11 v. pin& supra, was decided, Section 24 of Article III did not provide for an annual salary,.butmerely a per,diem during the tlinethat the Legislature was In session and therefore performanceof oSSlcla1 duties was not on an annual basis except for such Interim committeework as was assigned to Interim committees created by the Legislature. In 1960, Section 24 of Article III of the Constitutionof Texas was amended so as It now reads as follows: *Members of the Legislature shall receive from the Public Treasury.an annual salary of not exceeding Four Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars ($4,800) per year and a per diem of not exceeding Twelve Dollars ($12 per day for the first one hundred and twenty t120 days only of each Regular Session and for thirty t30) days of each Special Session of the Legislature. No Regular Session Shall be of longer duration than one hundred and forty (140) days. "In addition to the per diem the Members of each House shall be entitled to mileage In going to and returning from the seat of government, which mileage shall not exceed Two.Dollarsand Fifty Cents ($2.50) for every twenty-five (25) -45?- Hon. Milton J. Schlller, page 3. (M&101) miles, the distance to be computed.bythe nearest and most direct route of travel, from a table of distances prepared by the Comptrollerto each county seat now or hereafter to be established;no Member to be entitled to mileage for any extra Session that may be called within one (1) day after the adjournmentof the Regular or Called Session." It Is noted that the foregoing constitutionalamendment now provides In addition to per diem and travelingexpenses an annual salary for members of the Legislature,thus recaanizlngthat offlclal duties of members of the Legislatureare perSormed,through- out the year and are not limited to duties performedwhile the Legis- lature Is In session. Therefore, In determiningwhat expenses are allowed to be paid out of the Contingent Expenses Appropriationfor members of the House of Representatives,It Is necessary to examine the provisionsof House Simple Resolution No. 448 of the Regular Session of the 60th Legislature. The provisions of House Simple Resolution No. 448 applicable to your question reads as Soliows: "RESOLVEI),That the ContingentExpense Committee Is hereby authorizedand directed to credit such Representativean amount as determined by the Com- mittee on House Admlnletratlonnot to exceed $200 a month during any period the Legislature Is not In session. This amount Is authorized to pay for the employmentof a private secretary and for expenditures for stationery,supplies, postage, telephone tolls, telegraph tolls, answering service, and rental of electric typewritersand transcribingequipment. Ex bit thorfked hereunder shall be paid out oS?Ee ~~&%ve Expense Fund of the 60th Legis- lature or any other funds appropriatedfor the use of the House of Representatlves;and, be It further "RESOLVED,That each Representativem electric typewriters,transcribingequlpmenw I or subscribeto an answering service providing the monthly rental See does not exceed $25 for each Item. A copy of the rental agreement regarding any of the above must be filed with the Contlng$nt Expense Committee before payment Is made; . i . (R~phaslsadded) It Is noted that the foregoing provision does not authorize the purchase of typewritersor transcribingequipment but the Resolu- tion limits the expenditureof State funds In this connectiononly to the paymert of rent for such equipment. Therefore, the State of ?.45& Hon. Milton J. Schlllert:p~e.4(M-~O~) Texas cannot from~the provisions of House Simple ResolutionNo. 448 pay public funds toward the.purchaseof a typewrlteror transcribing equipment. However, any equity oc option to purchase.acquiredby .vlrtueoS:the rental contract becomes,property OS the State of Texas. Art. III, Section 51, Texas Constitution.. SUMMARY : The Resolution Is an appropriateand constitutional met.hod.to.dlrectexpenditureof a portion of approprla- tlon and.Slnanclngexpenses incurred hy members oS.the LegislatureIn the conduct~oS..thelr official business while the Leglslature~ls.notlr.sesslon. House Simple ~Resolut,lon No; u8 of the Regular Session of the 60th Legislatureauthorizesthe:payment.oSfunds .Sorrental of electric.typewritersand.tr.anscrlbing eculpment. Such,Resolutlondoes not authorize-thepurchase of such equipment. Any equity or option to purchase acquired by virtue OS a rental contract belongs solely to the State. Article ,111,Section 51, Texas Constitution. YQHs. very.truly, Preparedby John Reeves AssistantAttorney General APPROVSD:',' OPINION COMMITTEE Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman Kerns Taylor, Co$halrman J. H. Broadhurst V. F. Taylor Nell Williams Ralph Rash STAFF LEGAL.ASSISTANT A. J. Carubbl, Jr.