Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Hon. R. H. Cory, Chairman, Opinion No. M-70 State Affairs Committee House of Representatives Re: Constltutlonallty of Austin, Texas H.B. 1187, 60th Legislature, Regular Bear Representative Gory: Session, 1967. You ask the opinion of this office as to whether House Bill Number 1187, now pending In the 60th Legislature, Regular Session, 1967, is constitutional. This Bill, In creating appraisal service districts and boards for the appraisal and assessment of all real prop- erty and certain types of personal property for the purpose of taxation, entirely eliminates the County Tax Assessor and Collector from the performance of such duties and therefore conflicts with and Is antagonisticto Section 14 of Article VIII of the Texas Constitution, which provides: "Sec. 14. Except as provided in Section 16 of this Article, there shall be elected by the qualified voters of each county, an Assessor and Collector of Taxes, who shall hold his office for four years and until his successor is elected and qualified; and such Assessor and Collector of Texes shall perform all the duties with respect to as- sessing property for the purpose of taxation and of collecting taxes, as may be prescribed by the Legislature:' As amended Nov. 8, 1932; Nov. 2, 1954. Since the Constitution provides that the County Tax Assessor and Collector "shall perform all the duties with respect to assessing property for the purpose of taxation", and this necessarily includes the duty of appraisal which la the setting of the valuation of taxable property for the purpose of taxation, it Is evident that House Bill 1187 is In violation of Section 14 of Article VIII of the Texas Con- stitution. - 320 - Hon. R. H. Gory, page 2 (M- 70) The appraisal to be made by the Appraisal Service Dlstrlct Board as provided in the Act Is not advisory to the Tax Assessor and Collector as the Act specifically provides in Section 5(b) that the appraisal made by such Board "shall be used by all taxing &rlsdfctlons within the county'.- -(Emphasisadded) It appears that other sections of this bill also violate other provisions of Article VIII which would render It unconstitutional; however, since the bill clearly violates Sec. 14 of Art. VIII, there is no necessity for discussing these various provisions. SUMMARY ------- House Bill 1187, 60th Legislature of Texas, Regu- lar Session, 1967, IS unconstitutional. It violates Section 14 of Article VIII of the Texas Constitution as well as other Sections of said Article VIII. YjaGrsvery truly, Prepared by: W. E. Allen and William J. Craig Assistant Attorneys General APPROVED; OPINION COMMITTEE Hawthorne Phillips, Chairman W. V. Geppert, Co-Chairman V. C. Taylor Kerns B. Taylor Nell Wllllams Arthur Sandlln STAFF LEGAL ASSISTANT A, J. Carubbl, Jr. - 321 -