Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE ATKBRNVEY GENERAL OF-XAS Hon. W. S. Heatly Opinion No. ~-66 Chairman Committee on Appropriations Re: If the Legislature passes a House of Representatives general appropriation bill for Austin, Texas one year only, does Article III, Section &a of the Texas Constitution require sufficient cash and revenue to become available during the one-year Dear Sir: period covered by the bill? We are in receipt of your letter of May 3, 1967, in which you request our opinion on the following question: "In the event the Legislature passes a general appropriation bill for one year 'on1 does the Constitutional provision in question (Section %' ga of Article III require that suf- ficient cash and revenue become avellab1e during the one- year period covered by the bill?" It Is our opinion that the answer to your question must be in the affirmative. At the General Election November 3, 1942, Article III of the Constitution of Texas was emended by adding thereto a new section designated Section @a which provides in pert that except for a finding of an emergency, and an Imperative public necessity end "with a 4/5 vote of the total membership of each House, no eppro- priation in excess of the cash end anticipated revenue of the funds from which such appropriation is to be made shall be valid", end "no bill containing an appropriation shell be considered es passed or be sent to the Governor for consideration until end unless the Comptroller of Public Accounts endorses his certificate thereon showing that the amount appropriated is within the amount estimated to be available in the effected funds." In Attorney General Opinion No. o-5135, 1945, this office held that the above Constitutional provision doe8 mandatorily require the State to operate on a "cash basis" from and after January 1, 195. The following observation was made therein in construing this Constitutional provision: "The people, In edoptrng the amendment, evidently had that purpose in mind, otherwise the amendment would serve no purpose whatever, end it will not be presumed that the Legislature in submitting the amendment to the Constitution, end the people in - 306 - Hon. W. S. Heetly, page 2 (~-60 adopting it, would do,e useless thing. That the Legislature In submitting the amendment (and the people in voting for it) intended that the purpose was to place the State on a cash basis is manifest from the language of the form of ballot contained in the resolution (R.J.R. No. 1) submitting the amendment ...'I It is settled law that in construing such a Constitutional provision that it should be construed as it was understood by the average voter when he cast his ballot for or against it. In Brady v. Brooks, 89 S.W. 1052, the following statement was made: "The voters, es a rule, are unlearned in law and, es persons of this class would reaeonebly construe the Constitution upon which they vote, such ought to be the construction of the courts." It is, therefore, our duty to apply this rule of c,onstruction to the meaning of the Constitutional provision in questionend in doing so we must conclude'thet the voters evidently understood that the purpose of the amendment was to limit the authority of the Legislature to appropriate money in excess of the cash end anti- cipated revenues or, in other words, the average voter unlearned in the law understood that its purpose was to place the State on a "cash basis". It is a matter of common knowledge that prior to 1942 end beginning in the early 1930's, the State operated in the "red" continually and employee8 of the State had to discount their warrants et the end of each month et a loss to them. Until this Constitutional #;n-;;sionwas enacted, the State was never able to get out of the and operate on e cash basis. It is our opinion that the Constitutional provision imposes a duty upon the Comptroller which is self-enacting end no further legislation was required in this respect. When the Comptroller of Public Accounts endorses his certificate upon a bill showing that the amount appropriated Is within the amount estimated to be available, we believe that the spirit end intent of the Constitutional provision requlreg,thet the amount appro- priated for the particular year is within the amount estimated to be available within said year and not some other year. - 307 - . - Hon. W. S. Heatly, page 3 (M-66) SUMMARY In the event the Legislature passes a general appropriation bill for one year only, Article III, Section 49a, Constitution of the State of Texas, requires that sufficient cash and revenue become available during the one-year period covered by the bill. Yo rs very truly, ,7 ney General of Texas Prepared by Kerns Taylor Assistant Attorney General KT:sss APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Hawthorne Phillips, Chairmen W. V. Geppert, Co-Chairman John Grace Houghton Brownlee Robert L. Towery J. C. Davis STAFF LEGAL ASSISTANT A. J. Carubbi, Jr. '-308 -