Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

December 8, 1966 Honorable Don Hall Opinion No. c-785 District Attorney McLennan County Re: Compensation to court Waco, Texas reporters for appeal involving indigent de- Dear Mr. Hall: fendants. You recently requested an opinion from this office on the following questions: "(1) Is Article 40.09, Section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure mandatory? "(2) If 80, is the reasonability of the amount of the bill discretionary with the Commissioners Court, or must the Commissioners Court abide by the Certification of the trial Judge, regarding the reasonability of the charge, if said trial Judge so certifies? "(3) Is the payment of these charges a County or State responsibility individually, or a joint responsibility? It Paragraph 5 of Article 40.09, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, states, in part, as follows: 11 The court will order the reporter to make S&&I Cranscriptlon without charge to defendant if the court finds, after hearing in response to affidavit by defendant that he Is unable to pay or give security therefor. Upon certificate of the court that this service has been rendered, payment therefor shall be made from the general funds by -3766- Honorable Don Hall, page 2 (C-785 ) In answer to ycur first and third questions, Article 40.09, .paragraph 5, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, is specific and the legislative intent is clear. Ordinarily, when the word "shall" is used, the presumption is that it is in the imperative, and not in the directory sense. McLaren v. State, 199 S.W. 811 (Tex. Grim. 1917). Therefore, it Is the opinion of this office that the language of Article 40.09 directing that "payment shall be made from the general funds by the county in which the offenge is alleged to have been committed," is mandatory and not directory; and that upon certification of the trial L!Jdgethat this service has been rendered and that the amount of ihe bill submitted by the court reporter Is reasonable the Commissioners Court must make payment to the court reporter from the general funds ?,'the county. Article 40.09, paragraph 5, clearly states that the responsibility of paying the fee lies with the county and not the State. In answer to your second question, Article 40.09, para- graph 5, does not outline what the court reporters shall.be paid or what is a reasonable amount for the preparing of the statement of facts and transcripts. However, this office ruled in Attorney General's Opinion No. c-683 (1966) that a reasonable amount should be paid and that the trial court may certify whether the amount requested by the court reporter is reasonable. Opinion NO: c-683 also sets forth the guidelines that may be used by the trial court and states that the reasonableness of the amount requested by the court reporter is within the discretion of' ine trial court. It is our opinion that the Commissioners Court must abide by that determination. SUMMARY Under the provisions of Article 40.09, paragraph 5 of Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, upon certification from the trial court that the court reporter's fee is .reasonable the Commissioners Court must make payment from the general funds of the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General of Texas DHC/lk -3767- Honorable Don Hall% page 3, (C-785 ) 1 APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. 0. Shultz, Chairman Robert Owen Robert Norris Lonny Zwiener Gilbert Pena APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: T. B. Wright -376%