Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

A GENERAL, E-US Hon. Robert 3. Calvert Opinion NO. c-561 Comptroller of Public Accounts Capitol Station Re: Whether state oPficla$s Austin, Texas 78711 and heads of State agencies are to be considered State employees Insofar as the transportation allowance for the use of personally-~ owned automobiles are con- cerned, and related ques; Dear Mr. Calvert: tlons. In..yourletter reqtiestingan opinion from this office, you submit the following questlions: Ol. Are State official8 and Reads of State agencies to be consldared State em- ployees as far a5 the transportation allow- ance for the use of personally owned auto- mobiles are conaerned,? "2. If your answer is in the afflrma- tlve, do the Rules and Regulations promulg@ted by me, and approved by you in accordance with the provisions of the erbove'namedArticle, apply to out-of-State trips while travelllng in per- sonally owned automobile&? “3. If your an8wer is in the nkgative, what transportation allowanae should be allowed Department Heads and State officials? "4. If your answer is that the Rules and Regulations d,oapply to State officials shall they be allowed their actual expenses baaed upon the time necessary for travel by commercial transportation or ehall they be allowed their actual expenses for the entire time necbssary to travel by private conveyance?" -2709- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (c-561) With regard to these queetions, you make the following statement: "An examination of the Appropriation Bill, under which we are now operating, will reveal that the Legislature has not specifically set the rate per mile to be allowed Head~sof State agencies while using their personally owned automobiles." Article 6823a, Vernon's Ci$l Statutes, is known as the 'Travel Regulations Act of 1959. The provisions of Article 6823a, Vernon's Civil Statutes, most pertinent to our discuaalon, are quoted as follows: "Sec. 2. The provisions of this Act shall apply to all officers, heads of state agencies, and state employees. . . .Heads of state agencies shall mean elected state officials, excluding members of the Legislature who shall receive travel reimbursement as provided.by the Constitution, appointed state officials, appointed state of- ficials, whose appointment is subject to Senate confirmation, dlrectora of legislative interim committees or boards, heads of state hospital8 and special ,achoola,and heads of state institu- tions of higher education. 'Sec. 3. a. Reimbursement from funds appropriated by the Legislature for traveling and other necessary expenses incurred by the various officials, heads of state agencles,,,~ and employees of ,the state in the actlvemdls- charge of their duties shall be on the basis of either a per diem or actual expenses 88 specifically fixed and appropriated by the Legislature In General Appropriation Acts. A per diem allowance shall mean a flat dally rate payment In lieu of actual expenses in- curred for meals, and lodging and:,asauch shall be legally construed as additional com- pensation for official travel purpose8 only. "b. The rate of per diem and transporta- tion allowance and method of computing those rates shall be those set forth in Qeneral Ap- propriation Acts providing for the expeises of the,state government from year to year. -,27 lo- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 3 (C- 561) The provisions of the General Appropriations Bill for the current biennium, -B.B. 12, 59th Legislature, Regular Session, 1965, most pertinent to our discussion of your first question as quoted above, read as follows: "Article V nSec. 14. TRAWSPORTATIOR AUOWARCE. Wane of the monies appropriated by this Act for *travel expense may be expended tomreimburse costs of transportation on official business except in compliance with the following con- ditions, limitations, and rules: na. The rate of such reimbursement for the employee's personally owned automobile shall be eight (8) cents per mile. No additional expense incidental to the operation of such auto- mobile shall be allowed. . . .v "Reimbursements for out-of-State transporta- tion for the use of peraonally owned automoblles together with per diem shall never exceed the coat of commercial first class transportation from the nearest airport and the per diem re- quired had the tmployee travelled by such con- veyance. . . . The Legislature did not expresaly state in Article V, Section 14a of Rouse Bill.lg,-ttre~!Crane~o~ta~ioh“.~~l‘owande.,for offiaers and heads of State agencies using personally owned automobile8 on official State buslneas, both in-State and out- of-State. In Patterson v. City of Dallas, (Civ.App. 1962), 355 S.W.2d~838, ref. n.r.e. appeal dismissed 83 S.Ct. 873, 372 U.S. 251, 9 L.Ed.2d 732, the Court stated at page 844 the followlng: "Where the intention of a statute is not clearly expreaeed or la so inadequately expreased that the court must resort to construction, it is proper to consider the resulta of any proposed construction, and the court will, if possible, place upon the statute a construction which will not result In an Injustice, inconvenience, un- reasonableness, prejudi$e to public interest, or absurd consequences. .. -2711- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 4 (c-561) We construe thoae provisions of Article V, Section l&a of House Bill 12, which provide for the reimbursement for in-State and out-of-State transportation for the use of per- sonally owned automobiles aa applicable to officers, heads of State agencies, aa well as State employees. A contrary con- struction would prohibit the reimbursement of officera and .. heads of State agencies for the use of personally owned auto- mobiles on official State business, both in-State Andyout-of-- State, while it would allow such reimbursement for State em- ployees. Such a construction would be unreasonable and absurd. It is our opinion that the Legislature did.not Intend such a result. Therefore, It is our opinion that the provisions of Article V, Section 14a of House Bill 12 providing for reimburse- ment for in-State and out-of-State transportation for the use of peraonally owned automobiles are applicable to officers and heads of State agencies, as well as State employees. One of the rules Andyregulations based on the pro- vision8 of Article V, Section l&a of Rouse Bill 12, 59th Legislature, Regular Session,.1965, which has been promulgated by you and approved by this office under'the authority of Section 6a, Article 6823a, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is quoted in part as follows: "REIRBlJRSEWERTFOR OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR TRE USE OF PERSONALLY OWRED AUTOMOBILES WITR PER DIEM "If an employee whoae out-of-atate destination is served by commercial air- line elects or is allowed by his agency head to travel by personal automobile, he oan be reimbursed in an amount no greater than the cost of a.flrst-class commercial airline ticket to the point of his out-of-state destination plus, In the event his point of ,depsrture Is not served by an airline the expense of transportation to the near- est airport from his point of departure or headquarters. Also, added to this amount would be the appropriate amount of per diem which would have been allowed had he elf&ad to travel by commercial airline. . . . Based on our construction of the provisions of Article V, Section 14% of House Bill 12, it is OUP opinion that the part of your rule and regulation which provides for reimbursement for out-of~4tate transportation for the use of personally owned auto- mobiles, is applicable to officers and heads of State agencies, as well as State .employees. -2712- . - Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 5 (c-561) Article V, Section 17% of House fill 12, provides as f0110wst Y-80. 17. EXCEPTIOHS TO THE PER DIRU AND TRAVEL ALLOWANCES. a. Executive head~sof State agencies, Including the Executive Director of the Legislative Council, shall be reimbursed for their aotual meals, lodging, and incidental ex- penses when traveling on off.leialbusiness either in or out of the State.' Under the provisions of Article V, Section 17% of House Bill 12, supra, Heads of State agencies are reimbursed for actual travel expenses rather than on a per diem basis when traveling either in-State or out-of-State. Therefore, It is our opinion that the part of your rule, supra, whiah provides for a per diem allowance in computing the total reimbursement for out-of-State travel for the use of personally owned auto- mobiles, wh3le applicable to State employees, Is inapplicable to heads of State agencies. In addition, it Is our ,oplnion based on the express provisions of Article V, Section 17% of House Bill 12, that heads of State agencies are entitled to reimbursement for their actual expenses for the entire time necessary to travel In their personal automobiles. SUMMARY The provisions of the General Appropriations Bill, Article V, Section 14a, House Bill 12, 59th Legislature, 1965, providing for reimbursement for In-State and out-of-State transportation for the use of personally owned automobiles, are applicable to offiaers, heads of State agenciex, as well as State employees. Your rule and regulation, based on the travel provisions of the General Appropriations Bill, Article V, Section l&a, House Bill 12, 59th Legis- lature, 1965, promulgated by you and approved by this office under the authority of Section 6a, Article 6828a, Vernon'e Civil Statutes;,so far as it provides for the reimbursement for u8e of personally owned automobiles, la applicable to officers and heads of State agencies; as well : as State employees. However, that part of the rule which provides for a per diem allowance,in computing the total.,reimbursementfor out-of- State travel for the use of personally owned, automobiles, while applicable to State employees -2713- Ron. Robert S. Calvert, page 6 (c-561) is inapplicable to heads of State agencies, be- cause of the provisions of Article V;.Section House Bill 12, 59th Legislature, 1965. l'i'a, In addition, under the provision8 of Article V, Section 17a, 59th Legislature, Regular,Sesslon,~ head8 of State agenclea are entitled to relmburse- ment for their actual expenses for the entire time necessary to travel in their personal automobiles. Verj,truly yours, Ivan R. Williams, Jr. Assistant IRWjrrmkh APPROVEDr OPINION COMEITTEE W. 0. Shultz, Chairman Pat,Baileg Qordon Cam Robert Owen Roy Johnson APPROVED FOR TRE ATTORNET OENERAL BY: T. B. Wright -2714-