Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable Jerry Sadler Opinion No. C- 304 Commissioner General Land Office Re: Authority of the School Austin, Texas Land Board to reduce the gas royalty of a river Dear Mr. Sadler: bed tract. You have requested an opinion of this office to deter- mine whether the School Land Board has the authority to reduce the amount of gas royalty to be aid under the terms of an oil and gas lease executed in 193lil by the Board for #lineral Development, predecessor of the present School Land Board. The terms of the lease provided for a sliding royalty scale on oil of not less that 25-l/2% up to 66-2/3$ and a straight 50s royalty on gas that was produced and saved. The lease has been held by production throughout the years by oil production. However, in 1960 the Cayuga (Trinity) Gas Field Vas discovered and there.were three offset wells drilled to the 120 acre State River Be'd Tract. Because of the high royal.ty provisions for gas, it'has been impracticable for an operator to either drill this tract or to pool'it with adjoining tracts to form a gaa unit. The State tract therefore has been drained for the past several years by the&e offset wells. The only way the tract can be pro- tected from this drainage is to have the 50s gas royalty reduced so that the lessee can either drill this tract or pool it with adjoining acreages to form a gas unit., Article 5421c, Subsection 6b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, which was passed In 1933 by the #rd'Legislature, provides in part as follows: II pro,vided, further that said Board may ~odi&? said contract as aforesaid by adjusting up or down from time to tfme the State's portion of said oil and/or money payment as the condltion~ereinbefore, set, forth may justify and which may be equitable -1454- Hon. Jerry Sadler, page 2 (C-304) to the State and to said cont,ractors or their assigns, but in no event shall the State Is portion be less than. one-fourth nor more than now provided In said con- tracts, and in no event shall the Board of Mineral Development have any authority %?omodify or change said original leases as to gas. . . :’ (Fauphasls’add.ed. ) Certainly this article, if still controlling, would prohibit the ~Schsol~Land Board from reducing the gas roy- alty to a lower percentage than thatprovided in the orlg- lnal lease. However, ,in 1951 the 53rd Legislature enacted.Senate Bill~307, codiiied as Article 538% ,, Vernon’s Civil Stat- mutes, yhich,authorlaed the Commiqioner of the General Land -Office after the approval of the School Land Board ,tp enter Into unitization and, pooling agreements Wherein the School lands and’,State, lands can be placed into oil or ,gae u&ts. Section 2 of that statute provided that: “Any agreement authorized to be executed under the provisions ‘of this Act may pro- vide * boapi •,&g~ “~&;yegtnf.g z:,p ority , , 9 ,g of the State vested with authority to lease or approve the leasing of said lands may deem necessary for the protection of th ‘interests ,of the State.” t%‘h asis addzd. ) Section 5 of that statute stated very olearly the rea- sons that ,the Act waa passed. It reads in part as follows: “The fact that the value of many state- owned tracts is being diminished and there is doubt as to the extentof the power of the Commissioner of the General Land Office to enter into agreementa of the kind de- scribed herein, create an emergency. . . .” Section 3 of the Act provided that all prior laws in conflict therewith were rephaled. The Legislature in enacting Senate Bill 307 certainly gave the School Land Board the authority to enter into pool- ing and unitization agreements when it would be for the beat interest of the State to do 80. ‘Phe Board further. hasthe - 1455- Hon. Jerry Sadler, page 3 (C-304) authority to approve agreements with certain'provieions they deem necessary for the protection of the interests of the State. The Legislature in enacting the present Article 5382~ has repealed that portion of Article 5421c, Section 8, Sub- section 6b, which prohibited the Board for Mineral Develop- ment from changing or modifying the terms of sn ori inal oil and gas lease as to gas. In passing Article 53%20, the Legislature gave the School Land Board the authority to enter into unitization and pooling agreements affecting State lands. It is an elementary principle of oil and gas law that the execution of a gas unitization agreement changes the terms of the ori lnal lease. Veal v. Thomanson, 138 Tex. 341, 159 S.W.2d '$72 k1942). Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the School Land Board does have authority by virtue of the pro- visions of Article 5382~ to reduce the gas royalty from that provided in the original lease by entering into a unitization or pooling agreement which provides for a lesser royalty, provided however, that the Board deems such provi- sions necessary to protect the Interests of the State. SUMMARY The School Land Board has authority under Article 5382c, V.C.S., to modify the terms of an oil and gas lease as to gas if they deem such changes as for the best interest-of the State. Yours very truly, WAQGORRR CARR Attorney General of LS:afg Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: Opinion Committee W. V. Oeppert, Chairman -1456- Hon. Jerry Sadler, Page 4 (C-304) Ben Harrison Larry Merriman Grady Chandler Larry Craddock APPROVEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Stanton Stone -1457-