Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

.~ THEATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS December 17, 1963 Honorable D. C. Greer Opinion No. C-194 State Highway Engineer Texas Hi hway Department Re: Review of Attorney General's Austin 18 , Texas Opinion No. V-1049 (1950) in light of Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code as amended by the 57th Legis- Dear Mr. Greer: lature and related questions. In your letter requesting an opinion from this office upon certain questions you have stated that: "AttorneyGeneral Opinion No. V-1049 rendered April 29, 1950, advised us not to issue a certificateof title to a motor vehicle in the name of multiple owners joined dlsjunc- tively as owners on the certificateof title by 'or' or by 'and/or.' II . . . "Section 46 of the Probate Code of Texas, 1955 as amended by the 57th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 1961 provides for severance of a deceased joint owners interest and for his interest to descend, and be vested in, the heirs or legal representativesof his estate. The Act provides, however, that joint owners may by written agreement provide that if either joint owner dies, his Interest will surxlve to the remaining joint owner or owners. In connectionwith the foregoing facts you have posed the following questions: "1, Should we permit a written agreement, such as contemplatedin the above section of the -934,- Hon. D. C. Greer, page 2 (C- 194 ) Texas Probate Code, to be filed with an application .fortitle of joint owners so that in the event . . of the death of either owner, the aurvlvlng Joint owner could claim title to the motor vehicle in accordance with the agreement on file by merely filing an ap- plication for certificateof title supported by an affidavit of fact similar to the type of affidavit specified In Section 35 P.C. 1436-l but without regard to the Interest of other heirs in the es- tate of the deceased owner. "2. If Question 1 Is answered in the affirma- tive could we also honor an agreement of joint owners If the agreement was not on file with us prior to the death of the joint owner in whose name title had previously been Issued. "3. Should we now issue a certificateof title to multiple owners of a vehicle and allow the words Ior1 or 'and/or'to appear thereon and subsequently allow either owner to claim or assign title without a release from the other." Section _ . 46 of the - __Texas Probate Code, as amended in 1961, reads In part as follows: "Where two (2) or more persons hold an estate, real, personal, or mixed, jointly, and one (1) joint owner dies before severance,his Interest in said joint estate shall not survive to the re- maining joint owner or joint owners, but shall descend to, and be vested In, the heirs or legal representativesof such deceased joint owner in the same manner as If his interest had been severed and ascertained. Provided, however, that by an agreement In writinn of joint owners of property, %he Interest of any joint owner who dies may be made to survive to the surviving joint owner or joint owners, but no such agreement shall be ln- ferred from the mere fact that the property Is held in joint ownership. . . ." (Emphasisadded). Section 8 of Article 1436-1, Vernon's Penal Code, the Certificateof Title Act, provides that: "The term 'SubsequentSale' means the bargain, sale, transfer, or delivery, with Intent to pass an interest therein, other than a lien, of a motor ve- h,iclewhich has been registered or licensed within this State or elsewhere, . . ." (Emphasisadded). -935- Hon. D. C. Greer, page 3 (C-~194.1 Section 33 of Article 1436-1, provides that: 'NO motor vehicle may be disposed of at subsequent sale unless the owner designated in the certificateof title shall transfer the certificateof title on form to be,prescribed by the Departmentbefore a Notary Public,. . . and no title to any motor vehicle shall pass or vest until such transfer be so executed." fEmphasis added). Section 35 of Article 1436-l provides that: "Wheneverthe ,ownershlpof a motor vehicle registered or licensed withln~this State is trans- ferred by operation of,law, as upon Inheritance, .devlse or bequest, bankruptcy,reclvershlp,judicial sale, or any other involuntarydivesture of owner- ship, the Department shall issue a new certificate of ,title,uponbeing provided with certified copy of the probate proceedings,If any (if no administration 3s necessary, then upon affidavit showing such fact and all of the heirs at law and specificationby the heirs as to In whose name the certificateshall is- sue), OP order, OP bill of sale from the officer making the judicial sale. . .- (Emphasis added). Section 53 of Article 1436-l provides that: "All sales made In violation of this Act shall be void and no title shall pass until the rovlsions of this Act have been complied with." Emphasis added). It is most clear from a study of the foregoing pro- visions contained in Article 1436-1, the Certificateof Title Act, that an effort to transfer title to a motor vehicle wlth- out complyingwith the provisions of Article 1436-l results in a failure of legal title to pass. This position has uniformly been followed by the courts of this State in such cases as Wise v. Cain, 212 S.W.2d 880 (Tex.Clv.App.1948, error ref. n.r.e.); Griffin v. Moon, 288 S.W.2d 543 (Tex.Clv.Ap, 1956); ContinentalCredit Corp. v. Norman, 303 S.W.2d 449 'iTex.Civ. A 1957 f -Bryant, 287 S.W. 2pdp+25(T;xP~~~'A~~.'l~;~j"'' In view of the foregoing statutes and the decisions of our courts, it would follow that an agreement between joint -936- Hon. D. C. Greer, page 4 (C- 194 ) owners of a motor vehicle, pursuant to Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code, that the Interest of any joint owner who dies may be made to survive to the surviving joint owner would not be sufficient in Itself to transfer legal title to the motors yvehlcleto the surviving joint owner pursuant to Article 1436- 1 in a situationwhereby the agreement between the joint owners Is merely presented or filed for the purpose of having a new certificateof title issued in the name of the surviving joint owner. This method of transferringownership In a motor vehicle is not authorized by either Section 33 or Section 35 of Article 1436-l. However, this does not mean that Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code, and Article 1436-l are in conflict, or that agreementspursuant to Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code involvingmotor vehicles are a nullity. In the case of Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co., 151 S.W.2d 938 (1941), the Court stated In its opinion that: "The transactionof March 18, 1940, between plaintiff and Bailey County Motor Company was ln- sufficient to vest the title to the 1939 model Ford In Bailey County Motor Company. For this purpose same was void and ineffective. This does not necessarilymean that it was entirely void and ineffective. An InefSectlveattempt to convey may in some cases be construed as a contract to convev. This transaction,In our opinion, was sufficientto bind the plaintiff so far as in its power to take the Initial steps necessary to enable Bailey County Rotor Company to obtain a certificateof tit1e. . . . (Emphasis added). II . . . "Rights plaintiff may have as to this motor car, but the right to foreclose a lien thereon It has not. It may have a right to recover the title and posaesslon of the car from defendant Bailey County Motor Company, but such right Is subject to an adjustment of equities. . . ." (Emphasis acided In the case of Rush v. Smltherman, 294 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.Clv.App.1956, error ref. n.r.e.), the Court held that a contract to sell and a sale of a motor vehicle without transfer of a title certificateto the buyer was valid as between the parties when the purposes of the Certificateof Title Act are not defeated even though under Section 33 and Section 53 of -937- s -- Hon. D. C. Greer, page 5 (C- 194 ') I, Article 1436-1, failure to transfer the certificaterenders the sale void. Consequentlywe,are of the opinion that while an agreement made by joint owners of a motor vehicle pursuant to Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code may be sufficient to es- tablish ownership of a motor vehicle as between the joint owners and their heirs, such an agreement would not be suf- ficient itself to authorize a new certificateof title for the motor vehicle being issued in the name of the surviving joint owner. The new certificateof title could be issued only after the provisions set forth In either Section 33 or Section 35 of Article 1436-l have been complied with. We are of the further opinion that this would be true regardless of whether the agree- ment made by the joint owner of the motor vehicle, pursuant to Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code, was filed with the State Highway Department before or after the death of one of the joint owners of the motor vehicle. Attorney General's Opinion No. V-1049 (1950), held that the State Highway Department is not authorized to issue a certl- ficate of title to a motor vehicle in the name of multiple own- ers,,jo;neddisjunctlvel$as owners on the certificateof title by or and by "and/or. In view of our foregoing opinion answer- ing your first two questions in the negative, and the authority cited in connection therewith,we are of the further opinion that the provisions of Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code do not than e or alter the holding in Attorney General's Opinion No. v-10&g (1950). SUMMARY An agreement made by joint owners of a motor vehicle, pursuant to Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code, would not in itself be sufficientto authorize the State Highway Department to Issue a new certlfl- cate of title to the motor vehicle in the name of the surviving joint owner. The provisions of Section 46 of the Texas Probate Code do not alter or amend the holding in Attorney General's Opinion No. V-1049 (1950). Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General -938- “- . Hon. D. C. Greer, page 6 (C- 194 ) By: PB:wb:mkh Assistant APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Norman Suarez John Reeves Murray Jordan V. F. Taylor APPROVED FOR THE ATTORm GENERAL BY: H. Grady Chandler -939-