Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

October 3, 1963 Mrs. Marie Hudson Firemen's Pension Commissioner 1010 State Office Building Austin, Texas Opinion No. C- 153 Re: Construct~ionof H. B. 35, Section 1OA (f), Acts of Dear Mrs. Hudson: 58th Legislature, 1963. We quote from your letter requesting an opinion from this office, in part as follows: "Several Pension Boards . have .re- quested-your opinion on that section of House Bill 35 amending Section 1OA (f) of the Firemen's PensionLaw which reads in part as follows: "'In the event a fireman terminates, resigns, or leaves the active full-time service of the fire department for any reason other than those for which pension benefits will accrue . . . he shall receive an amount equal to the,sum total of his monthly payments made while a partlcipat- ~' ing member in the Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund.' "Some of the Pension Board Secretaries are trying to interpret this to mean that a fireman is only entitled to his contributions paid in ,afterHouse Bill 35 went into effect; August 23, 1963. It is the opinion of this office and of the Committee who drew up this particular Bill who further state that it was their intention for this to mean that a fire- man was entitled to 'the sum total of his -742- Mrs. Marie Hudson, page 2 (C-153 ) monthly payments' from the date he started paying into the Fund. "It is further our opinion, however, that should a fireman return to active duty who had previously been employed as a fireman and had previously paid into the Fund but resigned before this Section went Into effect and again resigns that he will not be entitled to receive a re- fund of the payments made prior to his resignation before the Section went Into effect but only to his payments made after he rejoined the Fire Department after August 23, 1963." A statute will be given only a prospective operation unless the legislative intent to give it a retroactive effect is clearly apparent. Slate v. Cltv of Fort Worth, 193 S.W. 1143 (Tex.Civ.App. 1917) and not then so as to affect vested rights. Hester &'Roberts v. Donna Irr. Dist. Hidalno County. No. 1, 239 S.W. 992 (Tex.Civ.App. 1922, error ref.). Section 16 of Article I of the Texas Constitution was intended to protect every right, which may accruesunder existing laws prior to the passage of any law, which, If permitted a retroactive effect, would take away the right. Mellinaer v. Houston, 68 Tex. 37, 3 S.W. 249 (1887). Section 1OA (f) of House Bill 35, Acts of the 58th Legislature, 1963, supra, became effective on August 23, 1963. House Bill 35 amended Section 1OA of Article 6243e, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Section 1OA (f) of House Bill 35 creates rather than takes away or impairs rights acquired under existing law. The Intention of the Legislature as to a law is determined primarily from the plain and ordinary Import Harris Counts v. Smith, 187 S.W. 701, ~,'e2t%T~~~g&%~~ ' The language of Section 1OA (f) of House Bill 35 Is plain and unambiguous and the intent of the Legislature to give the section a retroactive effect is clearly apparent from the language used. -743- Mrs. Marie Hudson, Page 3 (C-153 :) Therefore, on the basis of the authorities and discussion above, it is our opinion that under the provisions of Section 1OA (f) of House Bill 35, a fireman, who was a participating member in a Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund on August 23, 1963, and who thereafter terminates, resigns or leaves the active full-time service of a fire department for any reason other than those for which pension benefits will accrue, is entitled to reim- bursement of all monthly payments made by him, notwithstanding that payments have been made prior to August 23, 1963. How- ever, there is no,authority for the retroactive reimbursement of monthly payments to firemen who were not on full-time service w,ith a fire department having a Relief and Retirement Fund on August 23, 1963, even though a fireman may have been an active full-time fireman prior to August23, 1963. SUMMARY Under the provislons,of Section 1OA (f) of House Bill 35, a fireman who was a participat- ing member in a Firemen's Relief,and Retirement Fund on August 23, 1963, and thereafter termi- nates, resigns or leaves the active full-time service of a fire department for any reason other than those for which pension benefits will accrue, is entitled to reimbursement of all monthly payments made by him, notwithstanding that payments have been made prior to August 23, 1963. There is no authority for the retroactive reim- bursement of monthly payments to firemen who were not on full-time service with a fire depart- ment having a Relief and Retirement Fund on August 23, 1963, even though a fireman may have been an active full-time fireman prior to August 23, 1963. - _, Mrs. Marie Hudson, Page 4 (C-153 ) Yours very truly, ,WAGGONER CARR Attorney General 1RWjr:ms:sj Assistant APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. v. Geppsrt, Chairman Lonny Zwlener Joseph Trlmble Rogee Tyler Fred Ward APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Stanton Stone -745-