Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THEA'PPIL‘ORNEY GENXZRAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 11. -AS March 12, 1963 Honorable J. W. Edgar Opinion No. C-35 Commissioner of Education Austin, Texas Re: Can either a single or a consolidated common school district be converted into a rural high school district under Articles 2922a-2922c, Vernon's Civil Statutes, or Dear Dr. Edgar: any other school law? You have written asking if a County School Board, under' the authority of Articles 2922a-2922c, Vernon's Civil Statutes, or any other school law, may convert either a single or a con- solidated common school district Into a rural high school dis- trict. c \ The relevant portions of Article 2922a provide: "In each organized county in this estate, and In any county which shall hereafter be or- ganized, the county school trustees shall have the authority to form one'or more rural~high school districts, b --yz2?&st~~~"~~~;u;~~~ school districts hav ng (400) scholastic population and independent school districts having lessthan two hundred fifty (250) scholastic population, for the purpose of establlsh- ing and operating rural high schools; provided, also, that the county school trustees may annex one or more common school districts or one or more independent school districts having less than two hundred fifty (250) scholastic population to a com- mon school district having four hundred (400) or more scholastic population, or to an Independent district having two hundred fifty (250) or more scholastic population, . . .' (Emphasis ours). Article 2922c reads as follows: "No rural high school district, as pro- vided for herein, shall contain a greater area than one hundred square miles, or more than ten elementary school districts, except -148- Hon. J. W. Edgar, page 2 (C-35) that the county school board of school trustees may formrural high scnool als- tricts, as provided in Article 2922a, con-' taining more than one hundred square miles, upon a vote of a majority of the qualified electors in the said proposed rural high school dlstrict~voting at an election called for such purpose; and provided further/that the said board of county school trustees may form a rural high school district containing more than ten elementary districts upon a'vote of a majority of the~qualified voters in each of the elementarydistricts within such pro- posed rural high school district." The leading case construing these statutes is State v. School Trustees of Shelby County, 150 Tex. 238, 239 S.W 26 (7 (lY!dJ. It construes Article 2922a to provide two methods of strengthening and Improving rural schools: (1) creation,,ofrural high school districts through grouping" and (2) strengthening existing common and inde- pendent districts through annexation. In construing Article 2922c, the Court held: "This article does not purport to confer on boards of county school trustees the power to create rural high school districts. It is but a limitation on the power conferred under the first part of Article 2922a, with exceptions to the limitation. Bell v. Dltmore, Tex.Clv. APP., 38 S.W.2d 397." Thus, we can find no language within either Article 2922a or Article 2922c, which would authorize the County School Board to convert a common school district, either single or consoll- dated, into a rural high school district, An examination of the other school laws reveals that under Article 27423, Vernon's Civil Statutes, a common school district may be converted into an independent school district. Similarly, Article 2922L (5),Vernon's Civil Statutes, author- izes the conversion of a rural high school district into an independent school district. However, we can find no statute au- thorizing the conversion of an existing common school district, whether single or consolidated, into a rural high school district. -1491 Hon. J. W. Edgar, Page 3 (C-35) SUMMARY An existing common school district, either single or consolidated, can- not be converted into a rural high school district. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General -, . By '@- Bill Morse, Jr. Assistant BMjr:mkh:ms APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Murray Jordan Scott Garrisbn Samuel Strong Pharr Malcolm L. Quick APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Stanton Stone -150-