Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

WILL WILSON A-RNEY GENERAL December 21, 1962 Mrs. Bess Blackwell Opinion No. W-15i3 Executive Secretary State Board of Hairdressers Re: Whether the students in a and Cosmetologists cosmetology department in Austin, Texas a Vocational High School are eligible to work on the public for a fee or other Dear Mrs. BLackwell: compensation. You have requested an opinion from this office upon the question of whether, pursuant to Article 7&b Vernon’ls Penal Code, students in the Cosmetology DepartmenE of a Voca- Mona1 High School are eligible to work on ‘the public for a fee or compensation. It is our understanding that many of the Public Voca- tional Schools have Cosmetology Departments, have complied with the provisions of Section 5 of Article 73&b, and are $e;zfgr; eligible to operate as a school of beauty culture. further understanding that the graduates of these Cosmetology Departments of Public Vocational Schools are eligible for licen- sure by the State Board of Hairdressers and Cosmetologists if such graduates meet the requirements of licensure as set forth by Section 4 of Article 73&b. Section 5 of Article ‘&b pertains to the prerequi- sites of operating a school of beauty culture, and, in addition, sets ,forth certain conditions and requirements which must be met and adhered to by anyone desiring to conduct a school of beauty culture. Section 5(e) of Article 73&b provides that: “No school shall be permitted to charge for work done by any student who has not completed fifty per cent (5056)of the required number of hours, as provided for in Section 5, Subsection (b); and no school shall be permitted to charge for work done by licensed instructors.” Section 5(a) of Article 734b provides in part that: I, . Provided, hotlever,that the require- ments L’to floorsspace, type of building, bond . . Mrs. Eess Blackwell, page 2 (WW-1513) requirement and number of licensed instructors shall not apply to Public Vocational Schools." The above quoted provision found in Section 5(a) of Article 734b indicates that the Cosmetology Departments of Pub- lic Vocational Schools are exempted from certain requirements as to floor space, type of building, bond requirement, and num- ber of licensed instructors; however, this is the only exemption afforded the Cosmetology Departments of Public Vocational Schools. Section 5(e) of Article 73&b allows schools of beauty culture to charge for work done by students when such students have completed fifty per cent (50%) of the required ~number of instructional hours set forth in Section 5(b) of Article 73&b. The above quoted provisions of Section 5'(a)of Arti- cle 734b do not exempt Public Vocational Schools from the re- strictions set forth in Section 5(e) of,Article 73&b, nor does Section 5(e) of Article 734b prohibit Public Vocational Schools from permitting a charge to be made for work done by students who have completed the required percentage of instruction. We are therefore of the opinion that there is no pro- hibition against the students in a Cosmetology Department of a Public Vocational School engaging in hair dressing, cosmetol- ogy, and manicuring upon the public, and there being a fee or compensation charged for such work by the school as long as the provisions of Section 5(e) of Article 734b are complied with. SUMMARY There is no prohibition against the students in a Cosmetology Department in a Public Vocational School engaging in hair dressing, cosmetology, and manicuring upon the public, and a fee or compensation being charged for such work by the school as long as the pro- visions of Section 5(e) of Article 73&b are complied with. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON spat Dailey PB:wb Assistant -s. Bess Blackwell, page 3 Ml (W-1513) APPROViZD: OPINIO1\! COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Sam Wilson Grady Chandler Pat Bailey Vernon Teofan REVIEWZD FOR 'IX?. ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore