Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THEA-ITORNEY GENEEAE OF TEXAS AUSTIN i%Twas FvII.I. wIu3o~ *-rroRNEY DENERAI. '-' September 2, 1960 Mr.~. J. 9. Grishak!, Opinion No, W-929 Criminal Distriot'Attorney 'Canton,Texas ." Re: Duty of County Attorney, District Attorney and Criminal '. District Attorney in Condemna- ,~tionSuits by the County or Dear Mr. Grisham: the State We have received your let,terin which you ask if it is the official duty of the County Attorney,torepresent the State and County in condemnationcases. You state that it is your under- standing tht'as County and District Attorney, It is not your duty officially to re resent the State and Van Zandt County in condemnationcases; tL t it is your understandingthat the county may, if it sees fit, employ your services to represent ..theState and county in condemnationproceedingsand pay a fee ~therefor. In Opinion Do. O-1040 dated July 7, 1939, it was held by this Departmentthat a county autorney~is not requi.redto re- present the county in condemnationproceedingsand that the commissionersf.court may contract with the county attorne:yto representsthe county in such proceedings and compensatehim as per contract. Opinion No. O-1379 dated November 2, 1939 held that a county may employ an attorney for,the purpose of instituting and prosecuting condemnationsuite for rights of way and pay him compensationout of road bond funds; that such compensa- tion should be a specific sum of money and not on a salary . basis. Opin,ionNo. O-1164,datedJanuary'l3, 1940, modified the above Opinion No. O-1379 by holding that the compensationof for condemnationcases may be on a salary; as may be determined by the commissionersV In,letter Opinion (R-960) dated December 3, 1947, it whs hald that the county may employ a law firm to represent the county in condemnation aasee when the Assistant County Attorney is a member of said law firm and .oitedOpinion No,,O-1040 as ‘ authority, a ,Mr., : :J,3. Grisham, page,'2..~(&929). _. ,. 'O'inionNo. 0-1040:&s again u held in two letter opinions (D-9577dated December 4;1947 and 7.R-2282) .datedFebruary 15, 195,l.b. .,. ':'The,aboveopinions haPe been.followedby our Department ~OpinionNo, G-1040 and we cite those opin- aiqee ‘the~original ions ae.reaeohefor our holding.~as hereinafter Sethout- .,It ~~~?e:aobice~,, .ho~ver;:thatthese o inions apply only to s~&ts~by'a,countyto ac uirwproperty3 y cond.emnation even though~the'suitmay~be 2iled in the name of the State of Texas. Since the above opinions were written; a new statute.has Ueen'eneatedpertaining.tosuits~.by the State Highway Commis-: sion in the name'af thenState for the purpo.seof condemning &nd fca h' way rights~of way.. This act.is contained in HouseDill;T 79, Chapter 300, Pa e 724, of the Acts of the &r Session of the Fifty-fi%th Legislature (1957) (Article %?V;A.C;&).. A’portion of Section4 of this Act (Article ~~ 66~3)~reads as follows: "."In the Drosecutionof any condemnation.suitbrought~ '~bp%he State Hightiay'Commission in the"name of the State ~. ~of Texas for'the acquisition.of property pursuant to the.' powers granted in this Act; the Attorney General,~at the .~_ request.ofthe State Highway Commission,or, at the Attorneys GeneralZs. diroction,'the:applicableCount or,District': : ‘Attbrxiey or Crtiinal District-Attorney,s1: all bring and prosecute the suit.inthe name -of the State of.Texas and,',. the venue of any such sui't-shaU.be Sfi'theGunty in tiich ': the property'ora part thereof.is e5.tu&ted,w ':Underthe above'statute,It la clear that b condemnation suits,. ,brought b9 the State Highway Commission in the name of the-State of Texas for the acquisitionsof.property,forhighway right@:-.of way, if,tbe At.torneyGeneral directs him to do sol, the applicableCo.untyAtlzorneyf,Distriot Attox'ney,or Criminal District Attorney of.the County where the land to be condemnad is located has the duty to bring and prosecute such suit, ,It is to be noticed, however, that this Act does not pro- vide for an9 compensationfor the attorney for services in filing and prosacuting condemnationsuits of the.naturejust mentioned. It,is well settled that an officer may be required by law to perform specific services or discharge additional duties for,which no compensationis,provided;that the obliga-', t&n to perform sutih services is imposed as an .incidentto the office and the officerby his acceptance thereof is deemed to ,have engaged to perform such duties without compensation. See Section 116 on "Public Officers" 34 Tex. Jur. 531; Rice v. Mr, J. S.'Grisham,page 3 (WW-929) I Roberts, 177 S.W. 149 (error dismissed);M&alla v. Rockdale,. 246* 654 (Corn.App.); and Hallman v. Campbell, 57 Ten. 54. In answer to the questions propounded,you are advised it is our opinion that it is not the duty of the county attorney, district, or criminal district attorney officially to represent the county in filing-and prosecuting condemnationsuits by the county whether in t e name of the county or the @ate and that the commissioners~.court may contract for such officers or other attorneys to Perform such services and pay for the same. As.to suits filed by the State Highway Commission in the name of the State, it is the duty of such attorneys,when directed.bythe Attorney General.to do eo, to bring and prosecute such suite. The law does not.authoriae any compensation to be paid for smh:serv$ces. ii!mix 1, A County Attorney, District Attorney; or Criminal District Attorney is not required officially to repre- sent the County end State incondemnation suits yhzug~; by the Connty in the nme of the.Staue'or County. ml&loners' court may employ such attorneys or other attar- neys for such sertices and pay for the-same. :2* In suits~broughtby the State Highway Commission in the name of the State of Texas to condemn~propertyfor highway rights of way, such attorneys-when directed by the .AttorneyGeaeral to do so, shall bring and prosecute such apits, but the law does not authorire any compensa- tion to be paid for such services. Very truly -yours, UulL WILSON neral of Texas APEgZOVHD: OPINION CONMIT!TEE REVIEWED FOR THE ATTGFLNEYGE~AL W. V. Gsppert,iChairminl BY: Houghton Brownlee Robert T. Lewis Cecil Cammack~ Ray Scruggs Richard Wells