Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE~ATTORNEY GF~ERAL OFTEXAS April 6, 1959 Honorable William J. Gillespie County Attorney Lubbock County Lubbock, Texas Opinion No. WW-!X!8 Re:' Whether the office of '~county superintendent ,' for Lubbock County was abolished by Article 2688~ of Vernon's Civil Dear Mr. Oillespie: Statutes. We quote from your request for an opinion as follows: "Article 2688c, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, provides that counties having a population of not less than 28,000, accord- ing to the last preceding Federal census in which there 'areno common ,schooldistricts, that the office of county school superln- tendent is abolished and that the duties performed by the'county school superintendent shall thereafter be performed by the county judge of such county. "Lubbock County has a population fn excess of 28,000 by,the last preceding Fed- eral census. The county school superin- tendent was again elected in the general elec- tion of November, 193, .for'afour year term and hastaken office as such county school superintendent.' '?l?hereare four rural high school districts in Lubbock County, and Article 2922B, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes pro- vides that for some purposes rural high ,,schooldistricts-areclassifiedas common school dlstrlct~s: "Please advise whether or not Lubbock County should have a county school superlnten- dent and if such school superintendentcould legally be paid." Honorable'WilliamJ. Gillespie,page 2 (WW-588~) Section 1 of Article 2688~ of Vernon's Civil Statutes, as amended by Acts of the 53rd Legislature,Regular Session, 1953, Chapter 3.22,reads as follows: "From and after the effective date of this Act the duties now performed by county superintendentsIn all counties In this State having a population of not less than thirty thousand (30,000)accord- ing to the last preceding Federal Census and In which there are no common school districts, shall be performed by the county judges of such counties, and the office of county superintendent,as such, shall cease to exist; provided, however, that the county superintendentsin such counties who have been heretofore elected to the office of county superintendentshall serve until the expiration of the time for which they were elected, and that thereafter the duties now performed by county superintendentsin such counties shall be performed by the county judge of such counties." It Is noted that Article 26880 only,appliesto those counties having the prescribed populatlon and in which there are no common school districts. The question presented Is whether a Rural High School Distri,ct,of which Lubbock County has four (a), is a common school district within the meaning and intendmentof Article 2688~. We think that It Is. Provision for the establishmentof Rural High School Districts is made by Article 2922a of Vernon's Civil Statutes. Article 2922b provides: "Rural High School ,Dlstrlctsas pro- vided in the preceding Article shall be classed as common school districts, . . .' We find no other provision of the statuteswhich abolishes the office of county superintendentof schools of Lubbock County. You are therefore advised that Lubbock County IS authorized to maintain the office of county superintendent of schools. r-4 . Honorable William J. QlllesPle, Page 3 (w-5a) SUMMARY Lubbock County Is authorized to maintain the office of county superintendentof schools since the office has not been abolished by any provision of existing statutes. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney ,Generalof Texas &P----Q@- Leonard Passmore Assistant LP:rm:zt APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman tfarvinIi.Brown, Jr. Thomas Burrus W. Ray Scruggs Jot Hodges, Jr. REVIEWEDFORTREATTORNsYGENERAL BY: ti.V. Qeppert