Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

June 24, 1958 Hon. Ramie Qriffin Opinion No. W-465 District Attorney Jefferson County Re: Is the United States Bkatmont, Texas required to pay the indexing fee as provided by Art. 3930 in addition to the $1.00 fee which they are required to pay Dear Mr. Qrlffln: under Article 6644? You request the opinion of this office upon the above- captioned matter. To answer your request, we make reference to certain statutory provisions -- one Federal and two State. Sec- tion 6323, 26 U.S.C.A. 451 provides in part as follows: "Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) the lien imposed by section 6321 shall not be valid as against any mortgagee, pledgee, purchaser, or judgment creditor until notice thereof has been filed by the Secretary or his delegate -- "(1)Under state or territorial laws. -- In the office designated by the law of the State or Territory in which the property subject to the lien is situated, whenever the State or Territory has by law designated an office within the State or Territory for the filing of such notice; or. . .' Pursuant to the Federal authority thus granted, the Fifty- third Legislature, Regular Session, passed House Bill No. 61, found on pages 12 and 13 of the General and Special Laws of that Legislature. The pertinent portion of this statute is as follows: "Section 1. Article 6644, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, is hereby amended so as to hereafter read as follows: . "'Thecounty clerk of each county is authorized to, and shall either file, or file and record, as is or may be provided by the laws of the United States, . . Hon. Ramie Griffin, page 2, (~~-465) every notice, abstract or statement of any lien or claim, or release or dlsaharge thereof, in favor of the United States or of any department or bureau thereof, when any such notice, abstract or state- ment prepared in conformity to the laws of the United States, is presented to him for filing or filing and recording. The county clerk shall number such notices, abstracts or statements, in the order In which they are filed, and if they are required to be recorded, he shall record them in a well-bound book to be styled, "Federal Lien Record," and in either case he shall index them alphabetically under the names of the persons named therein OP affected thereby, such index to be kept in a well-bound book styled, "Index to Federal Llens,'tand the county clerk shall charge a fee of One Dollar ($1) for each instrument filed or recorded. His failure to file, record or index properly any such notice, abstract or statement as herein required, or to be compensated therefor, shall not affect the validity or legality of any such lien or claim, or release or discharge thereof.'" The Fifty-fifth Legislature in 1957 amended Article 3930, Vernon's Civil Statutes, pertaining to the fees of clerks of the County Court. This is Senate Bill No. 237 and is found in the General and Special Laws of that Legislature on pages 477-478. The pertinent portion of this statute is as follows: "'Clerks of the County Court may receive not to exceed the following fees: 11. . . "'Indexing each name in any instrument required or permitted to be filed, recorded or registered in the office of the County Clerk .lO 1,. . .II It is apparent that the~act of the Fifty-third Leglsla- ture passed in 1953 pertaining to the filing and recording of Federal liens with respect to Federal taxes is a special act dealing specifically with that particular subject, and being for the specific purpose of providing the fee of One Dollar ($1) where none had been charged before; whereas the 1957 amendment to Article 3930, V.C.S., is a general statute passed for the purpose of Increasing the fees of the County Clerk and for the first time added a fee for indexing -- this fee being ten cents (104). These two acts, namely the 1953 act pertaining Hon. Ramie Griffin, page 3, (ww-465) to filing and recording of Federal liens In the office of the County Clerk and the 1957 act adding a fee of ten cents (104) to be paid the Clerk for Indexing, are not Inconsistent and both may be given effect. Since Article 6644, V.C.S., is a special statute it should be treated as an exoeptlon to Article 3930, V.C.S., the general statute. Walker v. Meyers 114 Tex. 225 266 S.W. 499. In construing Article 6644, V.C.S., its plain terms pro- vide that the One Dollar ($1) fee embraces a charge for index- ing as well as filing and recording. In the absence of clear legislative intent to the contrary, it must be assumed that the fee of One Dollar ($1) is all that may be charged for filing, recording and Indexing. It is therefore our opinion that the ten cents (log) fee provided for indexing in Article 3930, V.C.S., may not be im- posed in addition to the One Dollar ($1) provided in Arti- cle 6644, V.C.S. In other words, the indexing fee of ten cents (lO$&)provided in Article 3930, V.C.S., has no applica- tion to Article 6644, V.C.S., which fixes a fee of One Dollar ($1) for all the service performed by the County Clerk in con- nection with the filing, recording and Indexing of Federal tax liens. The fee of ten cents (lO$) provided by general law included in the amendment to Article 3930, V.C.S., passed by the Flfty- fifth Legislature in 1957 may not be charged for filing, recording and indexing Federal tax liens as provided in Article 6644, V.C.S., as amended in 1953. Yours very truly, LPL:db WILL WILSON APPROVED: Attorney General of Texas OPINION COMMITTEE ./;) s Geo. P. Blackburn,Chslrman By :i . J. Arthur Sandlin Wayland C. Rivers, Jr. Richard B. Stone REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY '3ENERAL By: W. V. Geppert