Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. (I - . THEA~ORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS WILL WILSON AITORNICY G*:NERAL June 4, 1957 Honorable E. W. Patteson Opinion No. WW-145 County Attorney Gonzales County Re: Whether or not a wife must Gonzales , Texas file a divorce suit before she ma proceed under Brti- cle 60 t , Penal Code of Dear Sir: Texas You recently requested an opinion from this office on the following question: “Is it necessary for a wife to file a di- vorce proceeding before she may take advantage of the provisions contained in Article 604, Penal Code of Texas?” It is our opinion that it is unnecessary for a di- vorce proceeding to precede the action contemplated by Uticle 604, Penal Code. Article 604, Penal Code of Texas, is as follows: “The Court during its term, or Judge thereof in vacation after the filing of complaint against or after the return of indictment of any person for the crime of wife, or of child, or of wife and child desertion shall upon application of the complainant give notice to the defendant of such application and may upon hearing thereof enter such temporary orders as may seem just, providing for the support of deserted wives and children or both, pendente lite, and may punish for the vio- lation or refusal to obey such order as for con- tempt *I’ We find the following statement in Ex Parte Tavlor , 137 Tex. 505, 155 S.W.2d 358 (1941): “It was well settled by the decisions of this State, prior to the enactment of Article 4639a, Acts 1935, 44th Leg., p. 111, ch. 39, Vernon’s Anno- tated Texas Statutes, that the courts of this State, in an independent suit not involving a divorce or a . Honorable E. W. Patteson, page 2 (WW-145) the custody of a minor child were without au- thority to compel the paymen t of allowances by a parent for the support of his minor child. , 120 Tex. 491, 40 S.W. er v. BOWY~ 130 Tex. e above statiment we inal action such as is provided for in the Penal Code, Article 604, which is not here involved.” “It is very clear from a reading of the above Act that it does not attempt to enlarge the power of the court so as to authorize the compel- ling of such payments in suits not involving a suit ;for divorce or the custody of a minor child. 9 e 0 It will be noticed that Ex Parte Tavlpr and the cases cited therein as authorities for the holding have reference to child support actions. These decisions were written prior to the enactment of Article 4639b, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, Acts 1955, 54th Legislature. This new legislative enactment permits a suit independent of a divorce proceeding to compel child support pay- ments. Certainly Article 604, Penal Code of Texas is an ancil- lary proceeding to a criminal action and is not conditional upon a divorce proceeding first being instituted. Article 604, Penal Code of Texas, provides an- cillary relief to a criminal action, and it is not necessary for a wife to file a divorce proceeding in order to take advantage of the provision of said statute. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON JLS: jl:rh:wb Assistant Honorable E. U. Patteson, page 3 cm!-1451 APPROVED: OPINION COMPfITTL&:: H. Grady Chandler, Chairman Robert 0. Smith Ed Cazares Will Davis REVIEWEDFOR THE ATTORNEYGENERAL BY: Geo. P. Blackburn