Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. 2 . THE A~TORNEYGENES OF TEXAS January 22, 1957 Honorable E. IQ. Jones, President Texas Technological College Lubbock, Texas Opinion No. WW-5 Re: Authority of Board of Directors of Texas Tech- nological College to en- gage In educational tele- vision broadcasting on a non-commercial basis. Dear Sir: your letter of January 8, 1957, relates that Texas Technological College has petitioned the Federal Communica- tions Commission to change the designation of T. V. Channel 5 in Lubbock from a commercial to an educatitinal.chanr+l And has filed an application for permission to operatd a T. V. station. The Federal Ctimmunications Commls&iQn has asked for clarification of the authority of the College to engage In such an activity. The question to be determined Is whether the Board of Directors of the College has authority to engage in educa- tional television broadcasting on a non-commercial basis. Article 2629 of Vernon’s Civil Statutes eets forth the purposes of the Texas Technological College a8 follows: “The Texas Technological College at Lubbock shall be a co-educational college giving thorough instruction in technology and textile engineering from which a student may reach the higheat degree of education along the lines of manufacturing cot- .,i ton, wool, leather and~textlle engineering, the chemistry of materials, the technique of weaving, dyeing, tanning and the doing of any and all other things necessary for the manufacturing of raw materials into finished products; and said college shall also have complete courses in the.arts and sciences, Hon. El N. Jones, Page 2. (Opinion No .WUi5) phyalcal, social, political, pure and applied, such as are taught In colleges of the first clae~, . leading to the degrees of bachelor of science, ” bachelor of’arts, bachelor of literature, bachelor of technology and any and all other degrees given by colleges of the first alass; eald college being designed to elevate the Ideals, enrich the lives and Increase the capacity of the people for the demo- cratic self-government, and particularly to give Instruction In technology, manufacturing and agrl- cultural pursuits, domestic husbandry and home economics so that the boys and girls of this State may attain their highest usefulness and greatest happiness and in so doing, may prepare themselves for producing from the State Its greatest possl- ble wealth. ” Article 2631 of Vernon’s Civil Statutes relates to the courses of study to be offered by the college and reads as follows : “In addition to the &OuraeEiprovided In technology and textile engineering, said college shall offer the usual college courses given. in standard senior colleges of the first class and shall be empowered to confer appropriate degrees to be determined by the board of directors, and shall offer four year courses, two year courses, or short term courses in farm and ranch husbandry and econom- ics and the chemistry of soils and the adaption of farm crops to the peculiar soil, climate and condl- tion of that portion of the State in which the col- lege Is located and such other courses and degrees as the board of directors may see fit to provide as a mean8 of supplying the educational facilities necessary for this section of the State. The Board shall furnish such assistance to the faculty and students of said college as will enable them to do original research work and to apply the latest and most approved method of manufacturing and, in gener- al, to afford the facilities of the college for the purpose of originating, developing, supporting and maintaining all of those agencies for the de- velopment of the physical, mental and moral welfare of the students who attend the college and for the further purpose of developing the material resources of the State to their highest polntof vblue and usefulness by teaching the arts of commerce and Hon. E. N. Jones, page 3. (Opinion No. W-5) manufacturing. All male~'students attending tNs coll,egeahall~be reqtired to'reoelve such Instruction1n"mllitaryacl~ce~a&dtactlcs~ as the board of.dlrectorsmay prescribewhich Shall at all times, damply In full with the require- ments of the Unlted'StatesCovernmentnow given as a prerequisiteto any aid now extended or hereafter to be extended by the Government of the United States to State Institutionsof this character and all such white male students shall, during their attendanceat such college, be sub- ject to such military dlsclpllne and zontrol as the board of directors may prescribe. The powers and franchisesof a college or university are In general such that may~be conferred by charter, statutory or constitutionalprovisions,and an Institutionwill ordlnari- ly be accorded the right to perform acts incidentalto its main wmose, although It ,wlllbe denied the right to perform acts not reasonably Incidental. Our examinationand study of the Statutes Indicates that the Legislaturehas seldom, if ever, undertaken by law to prescribewith exactness the courses of study, or related activities,of any of our state Institutions of higher learning. Final determinationof such matters has largely been left to the sound and wise discretion of the various governing authoritiesof said Institutionswith the limits of their authority being marked and defined In the most general terms. In Article 2629 the Legislatureexpressly manifested an Intention that Texas TechnologicalCollege be 'a college of the first class" and that said college was designed "to elevate the ideals, enrich the lives and increase the capacity of the people for the democratic self-government". The ac- complishmentof such purposes is the primary responsibilityof the Board of Directors of the college. The Supreme Court of Montana In the case of State ex rel:.PublicService Commissionerv. Brannon, 86 Mont. 200, 283, p. 202, aescribed the functions of the modern university in the following language: ?Phe activities of modern universitiesembrace a wider scope than mere teaching. Indeed the potentialitiesof service which'$y.y'be rend&- ed through these agencies cannot be compassedby any small measure. The knowledge diffused by these institutionsradiates far beyond the student body." Hon. E. N. Jones, page 4. (OpinionNo. WW-5) The case of Ingram v. TexasChristian University 196 S.W. 610, Court of Civil Appeals, Fort Worth, concernkd the authority of that Institutionto maintain a hospital in connectionwith Its medical school, said hospital rendering medical services to certain classesnot connectedwith the school, as well as the general student body. It was urged that such an activity was ultra vires of the school charter which defined the purposes of the school in the following terms: 11 . . . The support of an educationalunder- taking, to-wit the establishmentand maintenance of an Institutionof learning of universityrank for the education and training of students in the arts, sciences and languages and in all branches of learning." The court held that it was not ultra vlres of the school's corporate charter to establish and maintain a hospital In connectionwith its medical school and the universityas a whole, that such activity was "within the purview of the recited charter purposes of the university and was within the legitimate objects of its creation". An Attorney General's letter opinion dated January 27, 1948, addressed to Honorable Frank C. Smith, Presidentof the Board of Directors of Texas College of Arts and Industries,up- held the right of that Institutionto permit the installation and operation of a broadcastingstudio on the college camp'!-is. The building was to be constr,uctedand equipped by a private individual,the building to become the property of the St?lte but ownership of the equipment to be retained by the individ,ual. Although the opinion dealt with the question presented prima-i- ly in the 11 ht of the provisions of Senate Bill 393, page 262, Acts of the &6th Legislature,Regular Session, 1939, which con- cerned gifts and bequests'to our institutionsof higher leirn- ing, it did use language which we consider pertinent to y;7u:* inquiry as follows: %ICIS, your Board is not authorizedto permit the constructionon the campus of a broadcasting studio to be used primarily for commercial purpoaesP with only incidentalbenefits to the college. The determinationof whether the proposed installatior inquestion meets the statutory requirementsherein- before set out is a matter within the sound discre- tion of your Board." / . . Hon. E. N. Jones, page 5. (Opinion No.WW-5) We, therefore, conclude that the question of whether the Board of Directors of Texas Technological College may en- gage in educationa. television broadcasting on a non-commercial basis is a question that rests within the sound discretion of said Board; that if, in the exercise of such discretion, the Board ascertains that such an activity Is reasonably nec- essary for the accomplishment of the recited statutory pur- poses of the college and within the legitimate objects of its creation, said Board may legally engage in such an activity. Since Me question is not raised by yoiz inquiry, this opinion shall not be construed as dealing with the auth- ority of the college to engage in any type of television broadcasting on a commercial basis, in whole or in part, and neither do we pass upon the question of the availability of funds for such activities, either commercial or non-commercial. The Board of Directors of Texas Technological College has the authority to engage In educa- tional television broadcasting on a non-com- mercial basis provided that said Board, in the exercise of sound discretion, determines that such activity is reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the statutory purposes of the college and within the legitimate objects of its creation. Yours very truly, WILL’WILSON Attorney General By *e’& LP:st Assistant APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE H. Qrady Chandler, Chairman