Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

December 23, 1952 Hon. Robert S. Calvert Comptroller of Public Accouka Austin, Texas Opinion Re: Reconsideration of Att’y Gen. Op. V-1353 (1951) and all related prior Dear Sir: opinions. You have requested a reconsideration of Attorney General Opinion V-1~353 (1951) and.of all related prior Attorney General Opinions. Opinion V-1353 passed upon the taxability under Article 7060a, V.C.S., of certain well servicing operations. Subsection (b) of Section 1 of Article 7060a, was amended by Sec- tion XIV of House Bill 285, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951, ch. 402, p. 695, reads as follows: “(b) Every person in this State engaged in the business of furnishing any service or performing any duty for others for a consideration or compensa- tion, with the use of any devices, tools, instruments or equipment, electrical, mechanical, or otherwise, or by means of any chemical, electrical or mechani- cal process when such service is performed in con- nection with the cementing of the casing seat of any oil or gas well or the shooting or acidizing the forma- tion of such wells or the surveying or testing of the sands or other formations of the earth in any such oil or gas wells, shall report on the 20th day of each month and pay to the Comptroller, at his office in Austin, Texas, anoccupation tax equal to 2.42% of the gross amount re- ceived fr&m.said service furnished or duty performed, during the calendar month ne?rt preceding. The said re- port shall be,executed under oath on a form prescribed and furnished by the Comptroller .” In connection with your request, there has been submit- ted a report, compiled by various; members of the oil industry, de- fining terms’, explaining various operations involved in drilling, testing and surveying wells, an d giving reasons why each of said operations is ,or is not embraced by the provisions of Subsection kon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (V-1567) (b) of Section 1 of Article 706Oa above~,quoted. Likewise, a legal brief has been furnished us). This brief discusses the submitted report in the light of court decisions and prior opfnions of this office. We wit1 firat consider operations which might or might not be taxable as a service ,performed “in connection with the cementing of the casing seat of any oil or gas well 0 $ *” The bottom of the producing or oil string of casing, the last column of casing placed in a well, is commonly referred to as the *casing aeat.” Placing cement between the oil string and the sides of the well bore is, of course, the exact operation named in the statute and is a taxable service, Cementing ‘liners’ (strings of casing whose tops are situated below the surface) is also a taxable service if the linere are used a6 extensions of the oil string as distinguished from liners used to repair defective strings of casing. Various other cementing services ape explained and classified in the report as nontaxable. We quote the following therefrom. “Cementing conductor, surface, intermediate or protective casisg striags “In oilfield terminology, the casing seat of an oil or gas well is the bottom of the producing strfng of casing in the well. In the course’ of drilling, it may be found desfrable to run a string or s,everal strings of casings jdor to the running of the producing’string. These casing string6 are commonly referred to as conductor, surface, intermediate OP protective strings. -A conductor string is a rhort string of casing extending from tha surface to a comparatively shallow depth used to support loosely consolidated surface formations, to keep the top of the well bore open, and to provide a means of conveyfng fluid used in drilling from the well bore. “A surface string is a string run to greater depth than a conductor string and fulfills the same, requirements outlined above for a conductor 6tring. In addition, it excludes waters, and may provide sup- port for strings of casing subsequently rus in the well. “Intermediate and protective strings, when em- ployed, are run to facilitatedrilling operations for various reasons: (1) to exclude water; (2) to reduce Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 3 (V-1567) the cost of ,drilling fluid by keeping contaminants such as salt from entering the yell bore; (3) to eliminate, the loss of drilling fluids in ‘thiefing’ formatioti.9; (4) as a precautiondry measure to pro- vide a means of, controlling pressure in the event excessive pressures are encountered; and (5) to prevent caving. “Conductor, surfa&, intermediate and pro- tective strings of casing, When used, are used to facilita,t+ drilling operations. Cementing of these strings .cannot be considered bs Fementing the cas- in Geat in an oil or g&s well, and therefore is not Tzkixz *Cementing to control wells Eementmg for lost circulation “On bccasion, it may be found necessary to pump cement into a well for the urpose of: (1) bringing the well undei control; P2) shutting, off undesirable flows of fluids; or (3) sealing off intervalS in the hole where drilling fluid is being lost. These operaticins are under,taken to facili- tate drilling and are not, the”operdtion of cement- ing of the ca,sing seat, ixi an.oWor~ gas~well. “Plug back opdrations “A plug back operation is one in which the bottom section of the well bore is cement&d off to prevent the ,inflow ,of fluid from that,portion of’the hole.’ Mariy. types of @lugs are used. This operation is ‘not the c&rienting of the casing seat in &n oil,or gas well. “Ccmentin(i for abanddnment “Before abandoning a well; cement plugs are placed in the hole to prevent escape of fluids from one formation to another and to protect fresh water sands. The dperation of placing a cement plug in a well is ndt the cementing of the casing seat in an oil or gas well. ‘Squeeze cementing bperations ” ‘Squeeqe cementing’ is an opera&n in which a fluid cement, after being placed in the desired Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 4 (V-1567) position in a well, is subjected to high pump pressure to force some of the cement into the surrounding formations. This operation is not the cementing of the casing seat in an oil or gas well. “Cementing to repair defective casing Cementing liners for remedial or repair operations “Casing that is defective when run in the hole or becomes defective after being in the hole (becomes corroded, etc.) may permit unwanted fluids to enter the well or allow well fluids to ex- cape from the well, When such defects cannot be repaired by cementing alone, then a liner may be cemented through tha defective section. Such operations are not cementing of the casing seat in an oil or gas well. “Cementing for whipstock operations “In the course of drilling operations, it fre- quently becomes desirable to deflect or change the direction of the hole for one of several reasons: (1) to complete drilling in a predetermined target area; (2) to correct a ‘crooked hole’ condition that has developed during the course of drilling; or (3) to drill around an obstacle (lost tools, pipe, etc..) that cannot be removed from the hole, A deflect- ing tool which permits directing the course of a well, is known as a whipstock. It is a long, slender, tapered steel wedge which is supported in the well in such a position that the drilling tools are deflected from their previous course and in the desired direc- tion. Whipstocks are sometimes cemented in place, Cementing of a whipstock is not the cementing of -the casing seat in an oil or gas well,” We agree with the foregoing classifications for the reasons stated in the report. In Attorney General Opinion O-3627 (1941) the follow- ing questions were considered: “1. A party takes a contract from the operator to cement a well for a stipulated price (perhaps he uses 500 sacks ,of cement). Will he be permitted to Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page,5 (V-1567) deduct the cost of cement before computing the tax? “2. There is a tool known as a ‘cement packer’ which is used in cementing liners in wells. This tool is leased or rented to the owner of the well or contractor {for a fee of $12 per day operators time, plus car mileage to location and operator’s expenses, Would the party who receives rent for the ‘packer’ be sub- ject to the tax on the rental received or rental plus expenses of the operator? )I The first question on its face seems to imply that all cementing operations are taxable: however, the Opinion’s answer thereto limits its scope to “a party who cements a casing seat of an oil or gas well u e aR The cost of the cement w-held to be deductible from the gross receipts before computing the tax on this service. The Opinion also held that the furnishing of the “cement packer” was. the furnishing of a material and that “if the furnishing and installing of the ‘cement packer’ in questi= is one of the four taxable operations named in th,e statute [or is performed in connection with one of said operations] , the charge for furnishing the ‘cement packer’ should not be included in the receipts on which the tax is computed and the charge for furnish- ing the operator should’be included,” The previously quoted classification of the various cementing services is consistent with the results reached in Opinion O-3627., This office has also specifically ruled that a temperature survey made to locate the top of the cement behind the casing for the purpose of determining the success of the cementing is a taxable service since it is performed in connection with the cementing of the casing seat. Att’y Gen, Op.. V-1353 (1951). We will next consider whether certain operations are taxable as services performed “in connection with the shoot- ing D . . the formation of such wells j i We quote the following discussion from the submitted report., “Open hole shooting with explosives, pro- jectiles, shaped charges, or jets “Shooting of the formation is done in order to commence or increase the flow of flui,ds into the well bore. It is done by detonating an explosive charge in an open hole below the casing seat. This operation can be performed with the use of explosives, Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 6 (V-1567) projectiles, shaped charges, or jets, The opera- tion may be performed any time during the life of the well when the operator believes he can com- mence or increase the flow of oil or gas into the well bore. “This process is ‘shooting the formation’ in the language and meaning of the act, Article 7060-a; hence, is taxable, II . . . “Perforating pipe to provide opening in pipe “In oil field terminology, shooting for the pur- pose of perforating pipe is the creation of openings or holes in the pipe by explosive means. There are several methods: 1) The use of projectiles, and t 2) The use of shaped charges or jets. “The operation is performed any time during the life of a well when it is believed production may be commenced or increased by providing means of fluid flow from a formation into the casing. “The operation is performed as follows: “A device called a gun which contains a number of explosive charges is lowered on an insulated cable to a, predetermined depth in a well, Electric current sets off the charges. In the case of a perforating gun, openings or holes are created by detonation of the charges causing projectiles to pierce the pipe, In the case of shaped charges or jets, openings or holes are created by detonation of explosives which generate jets of high temperature, high velocity gases. These gases disintegrate the metal of the pipe, This opera- tion is not the shooting of the formation in an oil or gas well, and therefore is not taxable. *Shooting off pipe or casing Shooting “These terms mean, generally, salvage opera- tions, Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 7 (V-1567) “Salvage operations may be necessitated by several. occurrences, notably: (1) In a dry hole where casing has been in- s,talled and cemented in the well bore and it is desirable to recover as much of the casing as possible for use elsewhere; (2) When drill pipe has been stuck in the well due to the slaughing of the formation into the well bore, and it is desirable to recover as much of the string of pipe as possible; (3) When a well has produced its ultimate recovery and can no longer be produced economi- cally, and it is desirable to recover as much of the casing as possible for use elsewhere. In all of these cases, the casing or pipe is cut with an explosive charge lowered on a wire line. The form,of the explosive charge may vary widely, consisting of dynamite, solid or liquid nitroglycerin, or specially designed shaped charges known as jet’ casing cutters. ‘Since these operations concern salvage of materials rather than action on productive forma- tions, they are non-taxable. “Shooting to recover or remove fish in fish- ing operations ” ‘Fish’ are any obstructions in a well bore which are not natural. These may include drill bits or parts of them which have’been broken off or otherwise disconnected from the drill pipe. The fish may be any number of sections of pipe and drill collars which have twisted off in the threads or broken in two along their length. The fish may be hand tools or other metal objects which have fallen into the well bore from the sur- face. *Shooting to recover or remove fish is done for the purpose of breaking these obstructions into small pieces with an explosive charge. The smaller pieces are picked up more readily by magnets or special baskets. Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 8 (V-1567) “The disintegration can be accomplished by an ordinary nitroglycerin charge lowered on a wire line and exploded on contact with the fish. This usually causes sloughing of the forma- tion. The preferred method is to use the shaped charge, similar to that used in casing perforations. In this case, it is pointed directly downward and the jet effect is concentrated directly on the ob- struction which is under attack. “The procedure of using an explosive charge to clean out obstructions is not concerned with any formation fracturing and is not taxable. “String shot shooting to open screen or per- forations u ‘String Shot’, ‘Cord Shot’, or ‘Primacord Shot’ are similar terms used to describe a light explosive charge lowered into the well to clean ‘. the plugged openings of the screen or perforations. ” ‘Cord’ is an abbreviation of ‘Primacord’. u ‘Primacord is the trade name for an im-’ pregnated fuse cord which has explosive power. Normally used as a booster explosion for detonat- ing dynamite, it has enough power of its own to do cleanout jobs without rupturing screens or casing, ” ‘String Shot’ is a colloquialism which des- cribes the cord. “When the string shot is detonated, fluid is forced through the openings in the screen or the perforations, removing the solid matter from the exterior surfaces so that flow of oil will resume. “This is a cleaning out or restoring of fluid flow through the screen slots and not an action of shooting the formation, and, therefore, is a non- taxable service.” The above quoted conclusions as to the taxability of the described, operations are ins accord with prior rulings of this of- fice, In Attorney General Opinion O-3627 (1941) it was held that perforating the casing with a cutting tool called a *‘perforator” did not constitute “shooting” in the sense attributer! to that word by the Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 9’(V- 1,567) oil and gas industry. It is suggested in the brief that was furnished us that Opinion G-3627 holds that shooting for the purpose of clean- ing out an oil well is subject to tax even though it was not shown that a formation of the earth was shattered. We do not so interpret Opinion O-3627 since we think such interpretation would be incon- sistent with the discussion of “sho4ting” given at ppe 7-9 of the Opinion. Shooting for the purpose of cleaning out a well is subject to tax only if the shooting operation is done in connection with one of the named taxable operations. Attorney General Opinion O-3784 (1941) held that the use of a gun perforator in an open hole to fire bullets into the formations of the edrth served the purpose of ‘shoot- ing” even though the use of a mechanical perforator or a gun perfo- in its ordinary maxmer and note in connection with a named taxable operation was not d taxable’ service. Attorney General Opinions 04261 (1942) and V-1353 (1951) also recognize that perforating is nontaxable unless performed in connection with a taxable service. L . . * acidis- the formation of such wells e e .*, as well. of course, as services performed ‘in connection with” acid- laing formationa. la a taxable service. The submitted report classifies as aontaxable the following services: acidizing to re- cwer duck fkh OP stack drill pipe or casing; acidiaing to clean screens; acidlmimg to dissolve mud sheaths; and acidizing soluble metals. With this we agree since no formations of the earth are acidiced. It ho been suggested that Opinipn O-3627 holds that acidimiag to clean out a well is taxable without any showing that a formation of the earth was acidized. We do not think that the OpMoncan be so interpreted in view of the definition of acidiz- fng, quoted at page 9, as a “process of intro,ducing acid into the pore space of an acid-soluble producing formation D D .n; how- ever, that there m%y be no doubt on this point, we expressly hold that acidizing which does not have for its purpose the dissolution of a formation is.not a taxable service unless it is performed in connection with a taxable service, The report has classified as taxable as services *per- formed in cdn&ecti4n with . . 0 the surveying . . e of the sands or other formations of the earth in any . . 0 of1 or gas wells” the fol- lowing operations: electric logging to record geological forma- tions, radioactive logging, magnetic logging and dip recording. Radioactive logging is separated~into gamma ray logging and neutron lo&ng. Magnetic logging is still in the experimental stage. In Attorney General Opinion O-3698 (1941)) it was held that a dip surrey was h taxable serrica.~ A!1 of the other above enumerated msrvices are clearly ‘surveys” 4f the formations of ths earth and are taxable. See Petroleum Production Prac- tice by F. EA. Pbmme r, Part I, Sec. 24, (1939) 0 Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 10 (V-1567) Deflection or deviation surveys are explained in the submitted report an follows: “A aurveyy made in a well while drilling which utiline~ an inetrument on a wire line, or on pipe to record an angle of thedrill hole from vertical, The purpose of tbie rurvey i.s to determine the course of the drill bole in order to reach the desired objective and not to survey formations.” Consistently with aome of the conclusions reached in opinion O-3698, thin seryike would be considered taxable; how- ever, we are of the opinion that the above described operation is in fact a survey of the drjll hole rather than a survey of the’forma- tions of the earth and is not a taxable service under Article 7060a. “Depth measurement’ is described in the report, as “a suryey for the purpose of determining the depth of a point in a well bz the use of a weighted wire and a calibrated measur~inS device. Opinion O-3698 said of -depth determination”: ‘This operation consirrts of locating the depth in the well of certaimobjects or pa& of the well equipment. and it clearly come6 within the defini- tion of a survey.” We agree that the operation is a “survey* but think it properly should be treated as a survey of a portion of the well bore. Since it is not a survey “of the aantla or other formations of the earth,* it is not a taxable aerviceg and Opinion O-3698 is overruled on this point. Surveys to locate the free point of stuck pipe ar’e ex- plained in the report as follows:, ‘A hrvey of this type involved the use of in: strument8 to measure the’&retch of the pipe so that the pomt of seimtre can be determined. An inatru- ment is lower,ed into the pipe and measures the rtretch of the pipe. This operation is ,repeated at variow depth8 until no further .&retch i.s indicated. Thiaiirdikates the point of seisure.” we do not consider Wt thbopeiation constitutes a survey “of the sands or other formations of the earth” and there- fore hold that it ,is not taxable under Article 7060a. For the same reason, we hold that the following operationa, as explained~in the report, are not subject to: tax. Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 11 (V-1567) “Caliper logs ‘This BUrViy (sometimes called section Sage) involves the use of instruments with mechanical feelers or arms run in an uncased hole on a wire line or insulated electric cable to determine the siae or diameter of the hole which has been drilled. The recording can be made at the surface simul- taneous with the running, or it can be made by means of mechanical stylus contained within the instrument itself. This survey is for theprimary purpose of as- sisting drilling operations by knowing the diameter of the hole being drilled. *Collar location “A survey run in the well to locate the depth of the collars in the producing casing string. It is performed by means of mechanical feelers run on a wire line. This type survey is often run in con- junction with radioactive logs for the purpose of substantiating or measuring the depth of the col- lars. “Electric log to locate junk or fish in the hole “This survey involves the use of electric log or ‘Schlumberger’ to determine by means of surface recording of depth and electrical resistivity the point antwhich pipe,‘tools, or other objects have been lost and embedded in the wall of the bore hole. The elec- tric log in this case iS a useful tool to the drilling operator as a substitute for mechanical feelers. *Corrosion surveys %urveys run inside pipe of an oil or gas well to determine the extent of corrosion of the metal. These surveys involve the use of an instrument with mechanical feelers run on a wire line with record- ings at the surface or within the instrument-itself. ” .. 0 . *Fluid level surveys “Fluid level surveys are made after a well has ceased to flow naturally and is being produced by Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 12 (V-1567) artificial means. The level of the fluid is usually obtained by a sonic device which measures the period of time for a sound wave to travel from the surface to the fluid level and back to the surface. By knowing the speed of the sound wave and the time for the reflected wave to return, it is possible to calculate the height of the fluid in the well. The data obtained are of value in determining if a de- crease in production is due to the pump or gas lift valves being set too high or if the equipment is not functtoning properly. If the fluid level is near or at the depth where the pump or gas lift valve is set, the equipment is Bet too high. On the other hand, if the fluid level is found relatively higher than where the pump or gas lift valve is set, the decreased pro- ductton may be due to the equipment not operating properly.” We are urged to reconsider and overrule the holdings of Opinbm Q-3698 and V-1353 on the taxability of “temperature surveys”. The following question was considered in Opinion O-3698. “4. There:is performed in drilling for oil and gas a service known as ‘temperature determination.’ By lowering into the well an electrical resistance thermometer and recording at the surface in the form of a graph all its readings, the temperature of the entire length of the well is available. By de- duction from the known cooling effects of flowing gas, the less COO1ing effects of flowing oil, the heat generative effects of hardening cement, the follow- ing results are made possible: “a. Location of oil and gas bearing forma- tions and differentiation between the two. “b. Location of cement top behind the Casing. “c. Determination of the base of the gas to permit the casing to be set at the proper depth. “Please tell me whether or not this service would be subject to this tax?” The following reply was made to the above quoted query. Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 13 (k-1567) “Ascertaining the temperature in the various parts of the well is clearly a form of survey, ac- cording to the definitions of weil survey. See ‘Pe- trOieUm Production Practic,e,’ Part I, su ra. In a booklet entitled ‘Schlumberge~r Auxiliary--%- ervices,’ recently published by Schlumberger Well Surveying Corporation, on page 2, iS a diSCuSSiOn Of ‘tempera- ture determination in wells, and, the diSCUSSiOn is headed ‘Temperature Surveys’ and reads in part as fOllOW9: * ‘It has ,long been realized that the study of temperature in a drill hole could be of, great value if it could be accurately and practically ‘meas,ured e 0 e ” ‘In the last few years an electrical- resistance thermometer has been evolved which responds to temperature variations rapidly and records ,them within 0.2 degr,ees Fahrenheit of accuracy. This thermometer is lowered into the well at the end of the in- sulated cable used for electr,ical logging and all temperature readings are recorded at the surface, in the form of a continuous graph. ” ‘The most profitable purpose served by this type of temperature survey is the location of oil and gas bearing formations in limestone. In West Texas and Kansas this has been ac- complished in several’hundred temperature surveys which, in conjunction with electrical logging, located the pay and differentiated between oil and gas.’ (Underscoring ours) “Our answer to your fourth question is that, the service of ,‘temperature determination’ in the manner you describe in a survey within, the meaning of the statute and is therefore a taxable service.’ In so far as this answer goes, we believe it is correct; but we do not think it covered the entire question. The quoted authority was dealing with a type tempeiature survey which re- sulted in locating and defining various formations of the earth. It thus accomplished a survey of the sands or other formations of the earth, just as electric logging does, and is, in our opinion, a taxable service. However,,we do agree with the proposition submitted in the brief and report that not all temperature surveys Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 14 (V-1567) are surveys of the formations of the earth. Temperature surveys made in the course of producing operations to check the mechanical condition of equipment in the hole are not surveys of the formations of the earth and are not taxable. A temperature survey made to check the success of a nontaxable cementing job is not taxable for the same reason. To the extent that Opinion O-3698 holds to the contrary, it is hereby overruled. However, as we have previously stated, we think that a temperature survey made for the purpose of determining the BUCC@BB of the cementing of the casing seat is a taxable service since it is a service rendered in connection with one of the enumerated taxable services. This, as we interpret it, is the holding of Opinion V-1353; and it is hereby affirmed. We believe a general test of the taxability of temperature surveys can be stated in these terms: Temperature surveys are taxable only if made for the purpose of surveying the sands or other formations of the earth or if they are made in connection with one of the named taxable services. In Opinion O-3698 it was held that a “water-flow survey” was a taxable service. As stated in the submitted report: “Fluid ingress surveys are obtained whenever ’ it 19 suspected fluid 19 entering a well at a point where such flow is not. desired or when it is sus- pected certain sections. of a horizon are taking a disproportionate volume of the injected fluid. Exit surveys are run whenever it is thought fluid is leaving a well at a point where such flow is not wanted or when it is thought certain strata of a horizon are producing a disproportionate volume, principally water, of the produced fluid. This may be determined in various ways but probably the moat common. method is by use of a mechanical device lowered in the hole to measure the relative volume of fluid flowing at any given point. One of the principal methods used is called a ‘spinner 3urvey’.n We think that a determination of the relative volume of fluid flowing at a given point or in a given formation constitutes a survey of that formation within the meaning of the statute, and Opinion O-3698 is affirmed on this point. The last .enumerated taxable service is ‘testing of the sand: or other formations of the earth in any D 0 . oil or gas wells . . . The submitted report has defined “sands” and “formations” as not including the “fluids” - liquid and gaseous materials - which Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 15 (V-1567) may be contained in or produced from the porous space of the formation or sand. If this definition is the correct guide to the meaning of the statute, Attorney General Opinions O-3698, O-4188 and V-1353 are erroneous either in part or in toto. We quote the following excerpt from Attorney General Opinion O-4188 (1942). “The services described in paragraphs II, III and IV all relate to tests of the properties of fluids and gasin wells as distinguished from tests of solid materials found in the wells. The statute expressly enumerates ‘the surveying or testing of the sands or other formations of the earth in any such oil or gas wells.’ We believe that this lan- guage is intended to embrace not only the solid material actually composing the sand, but the gas, oil or water with which the sand may be saturated or other formations permeated. It is to be re- membered that the purpose of drilling oil and gas wells is to produce oil or gas. It would be strange indeed if a statute, patently designed to tax technical services customarily rendered by persons other than the driller in connection with the efficient corn- pletion and operation of oil and gas wells, were con- strued so as to tax the testing of non-productive formations through which the drill must necessarily pass, and exempt the testing of the properties of the very product, i.e., gas and oil, ‘which is sought to be produced. We therefore are of the opinion that analysis of bottom-hole fluids, the testing of pressures at various points in the well and ascertainment of the productivity index of the well are all services which come within the intended scope of the statute under consideration.” In Opinion O-3698 (1941) the following ruling was made: “Testin of the sands or other formations of the eart ---Ii-+o oil and gas wells is the taking of samples of the earth formations and fluid contents from the walls or bottom of the well and analyzing the same so as to ascertain the composition of said earth forma- tions and fluid contents. See ‘Fundamentals of the Petroleum Industry,’ by Dorsey Hogar, 1939, pages 226 to 231, and ‘Drilling Practices, by Charles Cyrus, 1939, pages 182 to 195;” Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 16 (V-1567) Bottom hole pressure tests, depth pressure tests, pro- ductivity index tests, gas-oil ratio testing, bottom hole sampling and analysis, open flow potential tests and gas-condensate well tests were held taxable services in Opinion V-1353 (1951). All of these tests are tests of “fluids”. In Sheppard Co., 208 S.W.2d 656 (Te~.Civ.App. 1948), the court held that the service of operating a portable laboratory, set up on the well location, for the purpose of analyzing drill cuttings was a taxable service under Article 7060a. We quote the following excerpts from page 657 of the opinion: “The service performed is the analysis of drill cuttings whCch are taken possession of by appellee after the same have been brought to the surface and separated from the drilling fluid by means of a shale-shaker. . . . The test made on the drill cuttings is to determine the gas and oil contents of the strata or formations of the earth encountered by the drill bit. The laboratory find- ings are furnished to the well owner and appellee is paid for the service. “It is not necessary to here further set out the methods employed by appellee since it is not material to the issue to be here~decided; except it may be added the’ laboratory of appellee con- sists of such equipment as enables it to make the analysis of the cuttings it takes possession of.” An examination of the record before the court in this case shows that the plaintiff taxpayer performed, among others, the following tests: “A We take the cuttin& and put them in a quart container. We put one pint of cuttings in this container, and we put one-quarter of the vol- ume of water. . . . We seal this container and put it in what we call an agitator . . .then we hook two hoses to this container. One is a suction hose, and the other is the return. There is a compressor motor in this system, and we pull a vacuum on these cuttings equivalent to four inches of mercury. By leaving the return valve closed, and opening up the suction side, we create a vacuum, and reduce the cuttings below atmospheric pressure, which is sufficient with four inches of mercury to release any Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 17 (V-1567) contained gases that are in the pore spaces or interstitial spaces. [S.F., pp- 6 & 71 “Q Now, what is the diagram, Plaintiff’s Ex- hibit No. 27 “A This is a diagram of a Wheatstone Bridge gas analyzer. [ S.F., p. g] u . . . ‘Q So you arrive at two conclusions by the use of this device; namely, the volume of the gas contained in the cuttings, and some notion of the quality of the gas? “A It is a qualitative analysis, that’s right. . . . “Q After you have completed the gas analysis, what is your next step? “A We take these samples and wash them very thoroughly and subject them to ultra-violet ray radiation. . e. ‘Q What is the purpose of that process7 “A Ultra-violet rays coming in contact with liquid hydro-carbons will cause them to be energized and to fluoresce and become visible to the naked eye. D L)D [S.F., pp” 11,121” The following further details as to these tests were also included fin the record: “Q And then you take those cuttings into the portable laboratory and you test these samples to determine the volume of the gas in it, and also to test whether or not, if there is gas there, it is high or low fraction gas ? “A Yes. “Q And you test it for that purpose? Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 18 (V-1567) “A Yes. “Q And if you think it is in what you think is oil -- liquid hydro-carbons, I believe you call it? “A Yes. “Q If you find some evidence of that, or if you believe it should be there, you put it through the other part of your labora- tory, which you call ultra-violet radiation? *A Yes, sir. “Q And you look at it and you can tell from that, in a general way, at least, as to whether or not it is a low gravity oil or a high gravity oil, according to the difference in color? “A That’s right.” Thus it is apparent that at least some .of the services which were held it be taxable in the Rotary case were test of ..“fluids”. This being so, we think that the words “sands” and “formations” must be interpreted as including the fluid contents of said “sands” and “formations”. Indeed, we think the Rotary case is decisive of this question. In this connection, we think it pertinent that the Legisla- ture has met twice since the decision in the Rotary case. Since it has not seen fit to amend Article 7060a by excludvom taxable services the testing of “fluids, ” it must be presumed to have acquiesced in the judicial interpretation of legislative intent. It is also submitted that analyses of cuttings are not analy- ses but inspections. Microscopic inspections of cuttings was one of the services performed by the taxpayer in the Rotat bley;nze. For the reason just stated we think such service is a taxa In Opinions O-3698 and V-1353 it was held that side wall sampling was a taxable service. We are urged to make a distinction between the taking of the sample and the testing of the sample for the re~ason that many samples are never tested. There is presently pending before the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Ju- dicial District of Texas Robert S. Calvert and Williati B. Davis v, . . . Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 19 (V-1567) A-1, Bit and Tool Company. A decision in this case could be decrsrve of this questron and for that reason we deem it improper for us to reconsider it at this time. SUMMARY Cementing “liners” (strings of casing whose tops are situated below the surface) is a taxable service under Article 7060a, V.C.S., if the liners are used as extensions of the oil string as dis- tinguished from liners used to repair defective casing. The following operations are not taxable under Article 7060a because they do ,not constitute nor are they done in connection with cementing the casing seat: cementing conductor, surface, inter- mediate or protective casing strings; cementing to control wells; cementing for lost circulation; plug- back operations; cementing for abandonment; squeeze cementing operations; cementing liners for remedial or repair operations; cementing for whipstock opera- tions . Temperature surveying done to determine the success of cementing a casing seat is a taxable serv- ice since it is performed in connection with cement- ing the casing seat. Shooting operations which are not concerned with formation fracturing and which are not performed in connection with one of the tax- able services enumerated in Article 7060a are not taxable services. Acidieing operations which do not have for~their purpose the dissolution of a formation are not taxable services unless they are performed in connection with a taxable service. El,ectric logging to record geological formations, radioactive logging, magnetic logging and dip recording are taxable serv- ices. A deflection or deviation survey is a survey of the drill hole rather than a survey of the formations of the earth and such surveying is not a taxable serv- ice. Neither depth measurement surveys nor surveys to locate the free.point of stuck pipe, nor caliper log- ging, nor surveys to locate the depth of collars, nor electric logging to locate junk or fish in the hole, nor corrosion surveys, nor fluid level surveys are taxable surveys because they are not surveys of the formations of the earth. Temperature surveys are taxable only if made for the purpose of surveying the formations of the earth or if they are made in connection with a tax- able service. To the extent that Attorney General Opin- ion O-3698 (1941) holds to the contrary it is overruled. - . . Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 20 (V-1567) Water-flow surveys are taxable as a survey of the formations of the earth. The words ‘sands” and “formations” must be interpreted as including the fluid contents of said “sands” and “formations”. Sheppard v. Rotary Engineering Co., 208 S.W.Zd 6 (Tex.Civ.App. 1948). Therefore bottom hole pressure testing, depth.pressure testing, pro- ductivity index testing, gas-oil ratio testing, bot- tom hole sampling and analyning, open flow poten- tial testing and gas-condensate well testing are taxable services. Microscopic inspection of drill cuttings is a taxable service. Sheppard v. Rotary Engineering Co., supra. APPROVED: Yours very truly, W. V. Geppert PRICE DANIEL Taxation Division Attorney General E. Jacobson Executive Assistant By,$%( ;I ;i;;-1 //’ ,’ .I, / i’!<, i Charles D. Mathews Marietta McGregor Creel First Assistant Assistant MMcc:mw