Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

T February 20, 1952 Hon. Robert S. Calvert ~~ Opinion No. V-1408 Comptroller of Public Accounts Austin, Texas Re: Applicability of gross re- ceipts taxes to air~express revenues received by Rail- way Express Agency, Inc., Dear Mr. Calvert: under the submitted facts. You request the opinion of this office upon the ques- tion presented in your letter of January 23, 1952, as follows: “Article 7058, V.C.S. reads in part as follows: * ‘Each individual, company, association or : corporation doing an express business by steam rail- road or by water in this State shall make, quarterly, on the first days of January, April, July and October of each year, a report to the Comptroller, under oath of the individual or of the president, treasurer or superintendent of such company, association or cor- poration, showing the gross amount received from intrastate business done within this State in the pay- ment of charges from express and freights, or from other sources of revenues received from intrastate business during the quarter next preceding.’ “I am enclosing copy of Air Express Agree- ment between Railway Express Agency, Inc. and the various air lines ~4th which they do business. “Please advise me if the air expres~s revenue received by Railway Express Agency, Inc.. under the terms of the agreement, is taxable under the provi- sions of Article 7058, V.C.S.” With your opinion request you submit for our exami- nation a contract form behveen Railway Express Agency, Ipcor- porated, and the air line company referred to in the contract as “Air Company, * which covers the contract or agreement between the express company and the air company with respect to the un- dertaking on the part of the air company to transport by air ship- ments of the express company. This contract is lengthy and somewhat involved, but it is sufficient to say that the air company Hon. Robert S. Calvert, Page 2 (V-1408) undertakes in behalf of the express company to perform by air express a certain part of the transportation of the shipments contemplated by the contract. The express shipments involved begin and end with the express company, the air company per- forming the intervening transportation. Article 7058, V.C.S., tevies a gross receipts tax on express companies carrying on business *by steam railroad” and requires such express companies to file h4th the State Comptroller on the first day of January, April, July and Octo- ber a report “showing the gross amount received from intra- state business done within this State in the payment of charges from express and freinhts, or from other sources of revenues received from intrastate business during the quarter next pre- ceding.” 1 At the same time such companies shall pay to the -SEItereasurer -an occupation tax” for the succeeding quarter “equal to Two and One-half (2:s) Per Cent of said gross re- ceipts” as shown by the report. Specifically, ‘your question involves the receipts by the express company derived from that part of the transporta- tion performed by the air company. Article 7058 was amended by House Bill 648, Acts 42nd Leg., R.S. 1931, ch. 222, p. 376; and certain changes were then made to the original act. The word Usteam” was added; so the act, as amended, applies to express companies doing an ex- press business by steam railroad instead of by railroad as was provided in the original act. The following was also added: * . * . or from other sources of revenues received from intra- state business during the quarter next preceding.” The only other change made by the amendment to the original act was to provide for quarterly payments instead of annual payments. We find upon examination of the emergency clause to this amended act a clear expression of the legislative intent. It reads: “The fact that it will be beneficial to the reve- nues of the State to have express companies pay a quarterly tax in lieu of an annual tax, and the further need of amending the statutes so as to make same ap- ply to express business done on other carriers than steam rai roa s, . . . We are here primarily concerned with the following expression appearing in the body of the act and constituting a 1 Emphasis added throughout. . . : Hon. Robert S. Calvert, Page 3 (V-1408) part of the amendment: * . . , or from other sources of reve- nues received from intrastate business during the quarter next preceding.” This phrase, construed in connection with the ex- press purpose as stated in the emergency clause, leads to the : conclusion that the receipts from such air line transportation is subject to the tax. In brie&; the purpose of the amendment was to impose the tax not only upon the receipts from that part of the business done by the steam railroads, but also upon other sources of revenue derived from express business done by other carriers for and in behalf of the express company. SUMMARY An express company is subject to the gross receipts tax imposed by Article 7058, V.C.S., on that part of its receipts arising from transportation of freight by the air lines in behalf of the express company. Yours very truly, PRICE DANIEL Attorney General APPROVED: W. V. Geppert By L?&?o13f-- Assistant Taxation Division - Mary Kate Wall Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant LPL/mwb