Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

January 4, 1952 Hon. J. A. PhIllips, Chairman Texas State Board of Public Accou&ancy The Steck Building Austin, Texas Opinion Ho. V-1384 Re: Legality of a licensed public accountant using Dear Sir: the designation “P.A.’ YOUPrequest for OUP opinion reads In part as followsi \ *The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy desires an opinion from your office in respect of whether or not a pub- C lic accountaM (one other than a Certified Public Accountant, but holding a permit to practice public accountancy) may use the designation, . or rather the initials ‘P.A.’ “Our ‘Board is having difficulty in satisfactorily lnterpieting the appropriate provisions of the Act. Section 16 deals with the desigimtion lCertifled Public Ac- countant’ and provides that such ,a person nay use the abbreviation ‘C.P.A.’ Section 18 deals with the use of the designation ‘Public Aocountant’ but contains no provi- sion for using the abbreviation ‘P.A. ’ (Similar to the use o;,~;;~;A;~ prr;id;fth for in Section 16). prohibited abbreviations and the first sentence prohibiting abbreviations closes with the following words% “Ior other such abbreviations by a public accountant or by any other person is prohibited. Ia Section 16 of Article 41a, V.C.S., dealiaq C with the initials authorized to be used by a certl-’ fied public accountant, provides: Hon. J. A. Phillips, page 2~:(Vi13841 *Any person who has received from the Board a~Csrtificate of Certified Pub- ’ lit Accountant and holds a valid permit to practice, shall be styled and known as a ‘Certified Public Accountant* and may also use the abbreviation ‘C.P.A. I. No other person except partnerships re- gistered under this Act, shall assume or use that title or abbrevia~tlon or any other title; sign, card or device tending to imply that the person using the same is a certified public accountant.* Section 18 of Artlcle~ 41a, V.C.S., relating to public accountants, provides: Hon. J. A. Phill.ips, page 3 (v-1384) In Board of Insurance Commissioners of Texas v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Texas, 142 Tex. 0, MO s . w. 2 d 906, 909 (1944) It is stated: 'Where the language of a statute is unambiguous, and its meaning is clear, the statute must be given effect according to its terms, and, 'we are not at liberty to speculate'upon the intention of the LegIs- lature in its enactment.'" We believe the language of the above quot- ed provision is plain, clear, and unambiguous. There- fore, it is our opinion that the abbreviation 'P.A." comes within the prohibited designations and may not be used~ by a public accountant. SUMMARY A public accountant is not authorized to use the designation "P.A.' after his name, such use,belng prohibited by Section 20, Art. 41a, V.C.S. A certified public akountant may use the designation "C.P.A." as specifl-~ tally provided InSection 16 of the same Act. Yours very truly, APPROVED; PRICE DARIEL Attorney General J. C. Davis, Jr. County Affairs Division E. Jacobson BY Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant BA:lllh