Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE XAS October 4, 1951 Hon. R. O'Hara Lanier, President Texas Southern University Houston 4, Texas Opinion No. V-1298 Re: Authority of the Board of Regents of Texas Southern University to prescribe new courses of study during the biennium beginning Dear Sir: September 1, 1951. We quote from your recent letter as follows: "The general appropriation bill, House Bill 426, passed by the 52nd Leg- islature, 1951, placed certain restrlc- tions on courses of study, and set up certain standards for size of academic staffs and teaching loads for all state institutions of higher education. Texas Southern University naturally was with- in the coverage of those provisions. However, later in this session the Leg- islature passed Senate Bill 286 which apparently conflicts with the regula- tory provisions of the general appro- priation bill. "It is the belief of the univer- sity administration that Senate Bill 286 operates to relieve Texas Southern University from the regulatory provl- slons referred to above in House Bill 426. If this is true, It would mean that in effect Senate Bill 286 placed the university for all practical pur- poses back within the operation of %~13~ill 140, Acts of the 50th Leg- , 1947, which set up the univer- sity. Hon. R. O'Hara Lanier, Page 2 (V-1298) "I request your official opinion regarding the effect of Senate Bill 286 upon the general appropriation bill, House Bill 426, 1951, as well as its effect upon Senate Bill 140, 1947." The Texas State University for Begroes was established by Senate Bill 140, Acts 50th Leg., 1947, ch. 29, p. 36 (Art. 2643b, V.C.S.). The name of the institution was changed to Texas Southern Univerqitv by House Bill 82, Acts 52nd Leg., 1951, ch. 65, p. 109 (Art. 2643f, V.C.S.)., Section 2 of Senate Bill 140, supra, reads as follows: "To provide instruction, training, and higher education for colored people, there is hereby established a university of the first class in two divisions: the first, styled 'Texas Southern University' to be located at Houston . . . to be gov- erned by a Board of Directors as provided In Section 3 hereof; the second, to be styled ' The Prairie View A ricultural and Mechanical College of Texas8 at Prairie View . . . which shall remain under the control and supervision of the Board of Dfrectors of The Agricultural and Mechani- cal College of Texas. At Prairie View Agricultural and Mechanical College shall be offered courses in agriculture, the mechanic arts, engineering, and the nat- ural sciences connected therewith, to- gether with any other courses authorized at Prairie View at the time of the pas- sage of this Act, all of which shall be equivalent to those offered at the Agrl- cultural and Mechanical College of Texas. The Texas Southern University shall offer all other courses of higher learning, in- cluding, but without limitation, (other than ae to those professional courses de- signated for The Prairie View Agricultural and Mechanical College), arts and sciences, literature, law, medicine, pharmacy, den- tistry, journalism, education, and other Hon. R. O'Hara Lanier, Page 3 (V-1298) professional courses, all of which shall be equivalent to those offered at The University of Texas. Upon demand being made by any qualified applicant for any present or future course of instruction offered at The University of Texas, or Its branches, such course shall.be es- tablished or added to the durriculum of the appropriate division of the schools hereby established In order that the separate universities for Negroes shall at all times offer ~equal educational op- portunities and training as that avail- ablent other persons of this state. . . . (Note: Texas Southern University has been substituted herein for The Texas State University for Negroes to comport with House Bill 82, supra.) In Article V of House Bill 426, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951, oh. 499, p. 1228, the general ap- propriation bill for the biennium ending August 31, 19.53,appropriations are made to Prairie View Agri- cultural and Mechanical College, Texas Southern University, and other State institutions of higher learning. Limitations on courses of study and standards for size of academic staff and teaching loads for these institutions are found In Sections 20, 21, and 22 of Article V, su ra at pages 1469- 1470. These sections provide-+n part as follows: "Sec. 20. Limitations on Courses of Study. None of the appropriations herein made and authorized, whether upon the State General Revenue Fund, local in- structional funds, or any other receipts and funds whatsoever except bequests and gifts, shall be expended for the contln- uance or establishment of a department of instruction which was not in existence on October 1, 1950, nor for courses of in- struction required for any degree which was not being offered by ;he institution on October 1, 1950, . . . "Sec. 21. Standards for Size of Ac- ademic Staffs. The number of full-time teachers employed in each teaching insti- tution named in this Article shall not, Hon. R. O’Hara Lanier, Page 4 (v-1298) for the fiscal year beginning September 1, 1951, exceed the ratio of one such teacher for each fifteen (15) full-time student equivalents enrolled in such in- stitution on the sixth class day of the spring semester of 1951 or the sixth class day of the fall semester of 1951, whichever is the greater number. ". . . #I. . . The intent of the Fifty- second Legislature to limit the number of teachers employed at each institution to a reasonable number so that adequate salaries may be paid those who are em- ployed, and to preclude overstaffing which requires the money appropriated to be divided between too many teachers." "Sec. 22. Teaching Loads. During the biennium for which these funds are appropriated, it is declared the intent of the Fifty-second Legislature that the Governing Boards and heads of all State institutions of higher education shall offer only such courses and teach only such classes for which there is such a demand that each full-time teacher shall have a teaching load that is economical- ly justified; that they shall offer no elective course with an enrollment of less than ten (10) students in the lower division classes, and six (6) students in the upper division classes, and fur- ther that required courses under these limits should be kept to a minimum. . . .' Senate Bill 286, Acts 52nd Leby R. S. 1951, ch. 409, p. 752, codified as Article 20 3b-1, V.C.S., provides as follows: "Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Agricultural and Mechanical Col- lege of Texas shall prescribe the courses of study and the degrees to be offered at the Prairie View Agricultural and Mechani- cal College. The Board of Regents Of Texas Southern University shall prescribe the courses of study and degrees to be Hon. R. O%ara Lanier, Page 5 (V-1298) offered at the Texas Southern University. The courses of study and the degrees au;' thorised by,the governing Boards,of the respective institutions named above shall conform to the provisions of Senate Bill NO. 140, ,Acts of the 50th Legislature, 1947. ~"Sec. 2. Funds appropriated to the Prairie View Agricultural and Mechanical College and the Texas Southern University by Article V of House Bill Ro. 426, Acts of the ,52nd Legislature, 1951, may be ex- pended for the purpose of conducting such courses of study as may be prescribed under the provisions of Section 1. "Sec. 3. All laws and parts of laws in conflict with the provisions of this Act are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict only." The legislative history relative to House Bill 426 and Senate Billy286 reveals that the last legislative action concerning House Bill 426 was the adoption of a Conference Committee Report thereon by the House on May 10, 1951. The last legislative action concerning Senate Bill 286 was-the adoption of a Conference Committee Report thereon by the Sen- ate on June 8, 1951. Insofar as legislative action is involved, Senate~Bill 286 was the later expres- sion of the legislative will. If any provisions of these two acts are in conflict, "the first in time or position must give way to the last, and the lat- ter act will stand as the final expression of the legislative will." Ex parte de Jesus DDE la 0, 227 S.W. 28 212, 213 (Tex. Crim. 1950). See Att'y Gen. Op. V-990 (1950), and authorities there cited. The conclusion that Senate Bill 286 will control in case of conflict between its provisions and those of House Bill 426 is su ported also b the rule that a specific statute PSenate Bill 286) will control over a general statute (House Bill 426 enacted at the same ses,sionof the Legislature, re- gardless of the date of enactment of the two stat- utes. In such a situation, the specific statute will be treated as an exception to the general,pro- vision. Cain v. State, 20 Tex. 355 (1857); Wrircht Hon. R. O'Rara lanier, Page 6 (V-1298) v. Broeter, 145 Tex. 142, 196 S.W.2d 82 (1946). The 52nd Legislature In Section 1 of Sen- ate Bill 286 expressly provided that the courses of study to be offered at Texas Southern University and Prairie View Agricultural and Mechanical College "shall conform to the provisions of Senate Bill 140, Acts of the 50th Legislature, 1947." In Section 2 it further provided that the appropriations granted to these two schools by Article V of House Bill 42.6 "may be expended for the purpose of conducting such courses of study as may be prescribed under the pro- visions of Section 1." The provision in Senate Bill 140 requiring the establishment of courses upon de- mand of qualified applicants is clearly in conflict with the provisions of Section 20 and with Sections 21 and 22 of Article V in House Bill 425 insofar as these sections would curtail the offering of courses which have been demanded. The effect of Senate Bill 286 is to except Texas Southern University and Prairie View Agricul- tural and Mechanical College from the restrictions -_ appearing in Sections 20, 21, and 22,of Article V, House Bill 426, where there Is a demardfor a course koaccordance with the provisions of Senate Bill Since these schools are required to establish such courses as are demanded, It is evident that the institution m:'ghtnot be able to ,complywith this re- quirement and at the same time maintain its staff and minimum course enrollment within the limits set out in Sections 21 and 22. However, we are of the opln- ion that the schools are not authorized to offer du- plicate sections in any elective course for which the enrollment does not meet the minimum specified in Section 22. SUMMARY Senate Bill 286, Acts 52nd Lag., R. S. 1951, ch. 409, p. 752, exempts Texas Southern University from the provisions of Sections 20 21, and 22 of Article V of House Bill 426, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951, ch. 499, p. 1228, (the general ap- propriation bill) relating to limitations on courses of study, standards for size -. Hon. R. O'Hara Lenler, Page 7 (v-1298) .- of academic staffs, and teacher loads when a course Is offered upon demand pursuant to the provisions of Senate Bill.140, Acts 50th Lee;.,1947, ch. 79, sp.36, codified as Article 2543b, V.C. . APPROVED: Yours very truly, J. C. Davis, Jr. PRICE DANIEL County Affairs Division Attorney General Jesse P. Luton, Jr, Reviewing Assistant BF77m,d Charles D. Mathews Chester E. Ollison First Assistant Assistant CEO:awcz