Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Hon. Jhlnia zimmernlann Opinion HO. V-1193 County Attorney Swisher County Re: Eligibility to vote in Tulla, Texas ii elections to convert rural high school dis- trlcts into independent Dear Sir: school districts. We refer to your request for an opinion of this office concerning eligibility to,vote in an electton to ccnvert a Pural high school district into an independent school district. S .B. 316, Acts 52nd Leg., R S. 1951, ch. 42, p. 69, codified In Vernon’s Civil Statutes as Art. 2922&(5)l Article 29221(5), supra, provides in part as follows: ‘Section 1. Upon a petition properly signed by twenty (20), or a majority, of the legally qualified property taxpaying voters residing in any rural high school district In which there is maintained a first-class high school of twelve (12) grades, offering sixteen (16) or more credits, the County Judge of said county shall issue an order calling for an election to be held not less than twenty (20) nor more than thirty (30) days from the date of filing of said peti- tion, for the purpose of converting the rural high school district into an independent school district for school purposes. After said election is held, the CammIssioners Court shall canvass the re,turnsthereof as in other similar elections, and if the majority of the votes cast favor the change from a rural high school district into an Independent school dis- trict, then said Con&ssioners Court shall en- ter its order'to that effect and Incorporating said independent school district. . . . There- upon, such ‘independentschool district’ shall thereafter be regarded as duly incorporatedfor free school purposes only and shall have and is .. . Hon. Dennis Zlmmermann,page 2 (V-1193) hereby vested with al.1the rights, powers and privileges conferred and imposed by the General Laws of this State upon independentschool dis- tricts. ". . . 'Sec. 4. All bonds issued by and out- standing against any such rural high school district; as a school district, and all obli- gatlozs, contracts and indebtednessexisting against the rural high school district, shall become the obligationsand debts of the ln- dependent school district at the time of Its incorporation;and the said independentschool district, after same has been Incorporated, shall be held to have assumed the discharge of all such obligations,contracts and lndebt- edness, and the same shall be enforceableand collectiblefrom, paid off and dischargedby, the said Independent school dlstM.ct, as if or1ginallg created by it as an independent school district; and it shall not be neces- sary to call an election within tindfor such district for the purpose of assuming such bonds and other indebtedness. . . ." (Em- phasis added.) In connectionwith that law, you ask these quea- tions: 1. Is the election limited to only qualified property taxpaying voters? 2. Who Is to pay for the expenses of holding the election? It is observed that Article 2922&(5) provides that the petition invoking power In a county judge to call sucn an incor oration election must be "properly signed by twenty (20P or a majority, of the legally qualified property taxpailng voters residing In any rural high school district" designated therein. But the law does not state the quallflcatlonof voters who may vote ln a called elec- tion. It simply states that "If the majority of votes cast favor the change . . . said ConrmlssionersCourt shall enter its order to that effect." A similar situation is apparent in Article 2742j, V.C.S., as amended. That law proOides for the incorpora- tion of certain common school districts into independent . . Ecn. Dennis Zlmmermann, page 3 (V-1193) school districts. In an opinion of this office concern- ing qualified voters under Article 27423, It was held that all persons who are qualified voters and who are residents of a common school district as designated in that law, are entitled to vote In an election held un- der and for the purpose set out therein, citing Article 2955 on the matter of qualification. Att'y Gen. Op. V-348 (1947). Under that holding, qualified voters were not restricted to qualified property taxpaying voters. The slmllarity between the provisions and wording of Section 1 of Article 2742j and Section 1 of Article 2922l.(5)is so striking as to make It apy;earthat the latter was patterned after the former. Unless therefore, the presence of Section 4 in Article 2922115) which does not appear In Article 27425, imposes ~ome'restrlctionon the qualificationof voters under Article 29221(5), the holding in Opinion V-348 should control the znswer to your first question. The purpose of Article 29221(5) is singular. It is to provide for the lncorporatloiiby election of a rural high school district (classifiedas co!mon under Article 2922b, V.C.S.) into an Independentschool dis- trict. The boundaries of the successor district result- ing from such an election favoring the conversionwill be cotermlnouswith those of the former rural high school dletrlct. The obligations,bonded and other indebtedness. of the original distrfct will become those of the successor district to discharge. Section 4 so provides. A school district can no more escaue its o~l~i~ationsbr incoroorn- tlcn or conversion than it~could by vdissoluti~n. Mount Independent School Mat. v. Jackson, 152 S.W.26 -f 00 lTex.Clv.App. lgql:-error r%?T- Indeed, Section 6 of Article 2786b, V.C.S. spe- clfical3.yprovitles a8 follows: "Xr.each insts.ncewherein a common school district 5~s been or shnll hereafter be converted into 8n lndeuendent school dis- t;c; rdaln each instance wherein a dis- f ny kind or class has been converted into a district of s.nykind or class the 'boundariesof said original district and of said successor district being Cotermlnous, the inflebtednessof said original district shallbe ~leldand.consideredand is hereby declared to be the indebtedness of said 8uc- cesaor district without the necessity of an - . Hon. Dennis Zimmerman, page 4 (V-1193) election of any character for the assumption of such indebtedness,and the duty is hereby Imposed on the governing board of such suc- cessor district to levy and collect annually taxes against all of the property in said dls- trlct, sufficient to pay the interest and to pay or provl.dea proport&$natepart of the principal thereof. . . . (Emphasisadded.) Thus, Section 4 of Article 29221 5) merely ex- presses the law as set forth in Article 27 4 6b with re- spect to the obligations of a school district converted without change of boundaries Into another type of school district, and makes it c;.earlyapplicable to rural high school districts converzteQiatoindependentschool dis- tricts. Section 4 states that all bonds outstanding against any such rural high school district, as a school district shall become the debts of the successor inde- mchool district. The underscoredphrase consti- tutes a limitation on the assumption of bonded indebted- ness under this law, and prohibits the assumption of outstandingbonded Indebtedness of elementary districts of the rural high school district which had not previous- ly been assumed by the rural high school district, as such, under an election as provided in Article 292211 V.C.S. It appears that Section 4 of Article 29221(51 was carefullyand successfullyframed to avoid violatTon of Section 3a of Article VI, Constitution of Texas. Clear- ly, It is not the purpose of Section 4 or any part of Article 29221(F) to authorize therein an election for the assumption oT bmded or other indebtedness. Since the avowed Intent of Article 29221(s) is not to authorize an election for the assumption OT a debt, bonded or otherwise,its sole purpose being to provide an election for the conversion of a rural high school Bis- trict, It is our opinion that all persons who are quall- fied voters under Article 2955, V.C.S., and who are resi- dents of the rural high school district are entitled to vote in an election held for the purpose set out in Artl- cle 2922&(5). See also Art. 2954, V.C.S. With respect to your second submitted question, Article 2746b, V.C.S., provides In part as follows: WAll expenses Incurred In connection with or incidental to any school district election In connectionwith the public school within such school district shall be paid out - . Hon. Dennis Zinrmermann, page 5 (V-1193) of the available maintenance fund belonging to such district . . .' See Att'y Gen. +a. O-623 (1939), O-4919 (1942), O-7187 (1945)* It may not be amiss to direct the attention of those rural high school districts which contemplate con- verting or Incorporatinginto independent school districts to the case styled Bigfoot Independent School Dist. v. Genard, 116 S.W.28 804 ffirmed in 133 Tex. 368 129 S.W. -3 (1939). It heidathat where after a co&on school district has voted a maintenance tai, the district was re- gularly converted into an independent school district, the independent school district could not impose the mainte- nance tax without having first obtained the approval of the property taxpaying voters of the new district, notvithstand- ing the independent district embraced the Identical terri- tory which formed the common school district. Also see Pyote Independent School Diet. v. Dyer, 34 S.W.2d 578 (Tex 8omm.A~~. 1931) . All persons who are qualified voters and who are residents of a rural high school dis- trict of the designation and descriptlcm set out in Senate Bill 316, Acts 52nd Lsg., R.S. 1951, ch. 42, p. 69 (Art. 29221(5), V.C.S.), are entitled to vote in an eleztlon held there- under for the oonverslan of such a rural high school district into an Independent school:dls- 2955, u'.C.S.;Att'y Gen. Under Article 27&b, V.C.S., the expenses of such an election shall be paid out of the available maintenance fund belonnlne to the district. Attig beni opa. 0-623v(1339j, o-4919 (lg42), 0-7187 (1946). APPROVED: Yours very truly, J. C. Davis, Jr. PRICE DANIEL County Affairs Mvlslon Attorney General Jesse P. Luton, Jr. Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant Chester E. Ollison CEO:mw Assistant